In recent years, research information systems (RIS) have become an integral part of the university’s IT landscape. At the same time, many universities and research institutions are still working on the implementation of such information systems. Research information systems support institutions in the measurement, documentation, evaluation and communication of research activities. Implementing such integrative systems requires that institutions assure the quality of the information on research activities entered into them. Since many information and data sources are interwoven, these different data sources can have a negative impact on data quality in different research information systems. Because the topic is currently of interest to many institutions, the aim of the present paper is firstly to consider how data quality can be investigated in the context of RIS, and then to explain how various dimensions of data quality described in the literature can be measured in research information systems. Finally, a framework as a process flow according to UML activity diagram notation is developed for monitoring and improvement of the quality of these data; this framework can be implemented by technical personnel in universities and research institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Apel, D., Behme, W., Eberlein, R., & Merighi, C. (2015). Successfully control data quality: Practice solutions for business intelligence projects, 3rd, Revised and Extended Edition. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag.
Azeroual, O., & Abuosba, M. (2017). Improving the data quality in the research information systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 15(11), 82–86.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., & Abuosba, M. (2018a). Data quality measures and data cleansing for research information systems. Journal of Digital Information Management, 16(1), 12–21.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., & Schallehn, E. (2018b). Analyzing data quality issues in research information systems via data profiling. International Journal of Information Management, 41(8), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.02.007.
Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2006). Data quality—Concepts methodologies and techniques. Heidelberg: Springer.
Cordts, S. (2013). Data Quality in databases. Hamburg: Maren Nasutta Mana-book-Verlag.
DINI AG Research Information Systems. (2015). Research information systems at universities and research institutions-position-paper. https://dini.de/fileadmin/docs/AG_Positionspapier_engl_final.pdf.
English, L. P. (1999). Improving data warehouse and business information quality: Methods for reducing costs and increasing profits. New York, NY: Wiley.
Gebauer, M., & Windheuser, U. (2015). Structured data analysis, profiling and business rules. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Heinrich, B., Kaiser, M., & Klier, M. (2007). How to measure data quality? A metric based approach. In 28th international conference on information systems (ICIS). Montreal.
Heinrich, B., & Klier, M. (2009). Die Messung der Datenqualität im Controlling – Ein metrikbasierter Ansatz und seine Anwendung im Kundenwertcontrolling. Controlling & Management: ZfCM ; Zeitschrift für Controlling und Management, 53(1), S34–42.
Helfert, M. (2002). Planning and measurement of data quality in data warehouse systems. Dissertation, University of St. Gallen, Difo-Druck, Bamberg.
Herwig, S., & Schlattmann, S. (2016). An economics-based location determination of research information systems. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn.
Hildebrand, K., Gebauer, M., Hinrichs, H., & Mielke, M. (2015). Data and information quality. On the way to the information excellence, 3rd, extended edition. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Hinrichs, H. (2002). Data quality management in data warehouse systems. Dissertation. Oldenburg: Oldenburg University.
Krcmar, H. (2015). Information management. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
Lee, Y. M., Pipino, L. L., Funk, J. D., & Wang, R. Y. (2006). Journey to data quality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levenshtein, V. I. (1965). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 163(4), 845–848. (Russisch, Englische Übersetzung in: Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8): 707–710, 1966).
Martin, M. (2005). Measuring and improving data quality. Part II: Measuring data quality. NAHSS Outlook. Ausgabe 5.
Scannapieco, M., Missier, P., & Batini, C. (2005). Data quality at a glance. Datenbank-Spektrum, 5(14), 6–14.
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
Würthele, V. (2003). Data quality metrics for information processes. Zurich: ETH Zurich.
About this article
Cite this article
Azeroual, O., Saake, G. & Wastl, J. Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality. Scientometrics 115, 1271–1290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5
- Current research information systems (CRIS)
- Research information systems (RIS)
- Research information
- Data quality
- Data quality dimensions
- Data measurement
- Data monitoring
- Science system