Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 115, Issue 2, pp 637–654 | Cite as

A study of book reviews in SCI-Expanded, SSCI, and A&HCI journals by researchers from five countries: 2006–2015

  • Yaoyu Wei
  • Weiwei Fan
Article
  • 361 Downloads

Abstract

This article reports a study on the publications of book reviews by researchers from USA, Germany, Japan, China, and India. The Web of Science database was used to obtain the data concerning the publications of book reviews in SCI-Expanded, SSCI and A&HCI indexed journals from 2006 to 2015. Several results of interest were found. First, the results showed that the annual outputs of book reviews by researchers from Germany, Japan, China, and India increased significantly. Second, the number of book reviews contributed by researchers from Japan, China, and India is much lower than researchers from traditional scientific powers such as USA and Germany. Third, book reviews are published more in areas of social science and arts and humanities than in those of science and technology. Fourth, book reviews are much less cited than publications of other types are.

Keywords

Book reviews Web of Science Research areas Citation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the comments of the anonymous reviewers. We also appreciate the help of Dr. Dilin Liu at the University of Alabama, who helped us polish the language of the manuscript.

References

  1. Barboza, D. (2010). China passes Japan as second-largest economy (p. B1). New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  2. Department of Education, & Employment and Workplace Relations. (2008). Review of Australian higher education—Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  3. East, J. W. (2011). The scholarly book review in the humanities: An academic Cinderella? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(1), 52–67.Google Scholar
  4. Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Purnell, P. J. (2014). The power of book reviews: A simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes. Scientometrics, 98(2), 841–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1176-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hartley, J. (2006). Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1194–1207.Google Scholar
  6. Hartley, J. (2010). The anatomy of a book review. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40(4), 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartley, J., Cowan, J., Deeson, C., & Thomas, P. (2016). Book reviews in time. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2114-z.Google Scholar
  8. Lei, L., & Liao, S. (2017). Publications in linguistics journals from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau (2003–2012): A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1260274.Google Scholar
  9. Leo, J. R. D. (2009). The fate of the book review. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40(2), 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leydesdorff, L. (2005). The scientific impact of China. Scientometrics, 63(2), 411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1830-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, W., Ding, Y., & Gu, M. (2016). Book reviews in academic journals: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2172-2.Google Scholar
  13. Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moiwo, J. P., & Tao, F. L. (2013). The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1031–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicolaisen, J. (2002). The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields. Research Evaluation, 11(3), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Obeng-Odoom, F. (2014). Why write book reviews? Australian Universities’ Review, 56(1), 78–82.Google Scholar
  17. Oinas, P., & Leppälä, S. (2013). Views on book reviews. Regional Studies, 47(10), 1785–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Riley, L. E., & Spreitzer, E. A. (1970). Book reviewing in the social sciences. The American Sociologist, 5(November), 358–363.Google Scholar
  19. Sabosik, P. E. (1988). Scholarly reviewing and the role of choice in the postpublication review process. Book Research Quarterly, 4(2), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schubert, A., Zsindely, S., Telcs, A., & Braun, T. (1984). Quantitative analysis of a visible tip of the peer review iceberg: Book reviews in chemistry. Scientometrics, 6(6), 433–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02025830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spink, A., Robins, D., & Schamber, L. (1998). Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. State Council, P. s. R. o. C. (2015). State council eyes world-class higher education. Applied Linguistics. Retrieved February 16, 2016, from http://english.gov.cn/policies/latest_releases/2015/11/05/content_281475228417144.htm
  23. van Noorden, R. (2016). China by the numbers: Research capacity has grown rapidly, and now quality is on the rise. Nature, 534(7608), 452–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yip, G., & McKern, B. (2014). Innovation in emerging markets—The case of China. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Young, A. P. (1975). Scholarly book reviewing in America. Libri, 25(3), 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu, D. J., Li, D. F., Merigo, J. M., & Fang, L. C. (2016). Mapping development of linguistic decision making studies. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 30(5), 2727–2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang, H., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. (2013). Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project. Research Policy, 42(3), 765–775.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zuccala, A., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1979–1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations