Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 563–576 | Cite as

Sustainability of open access citation advantage: the case of Elsevier’s author-pays hybrid open access journals

  • Hajar Sotudeh
  • Zohreh Estakhr
Article

Abstract

The present study tended to investigate the sustainability of citation advantage of author-pays hybrid open access journals. Applying a comparative citation analysis method, it explored a sample consisted of 160,168 articles in 47 Elsevier APC-funded hybrid open access journals published in the periods 2007–2011 and 2012–2015. Two citation windows were selected in the study: one ranging from the journals’ publication years until 2013 (obtained from Sotudeh et al. in Scientometrics 104(2):581–608, 2015), and another ranging from the journals’ publication years until 2016 (data collection date in the present study). The comparative citation analysis of the older articles (published in 2007–2011) in the two mentioned citation windows indicated that they sustained their citation advantage in comparison with the toll-access ones. The citation advantage was also confirmed for more recent APC-funded OA articles (published in 2012–2015). Therefore, the passage of time did not seem to affect the citation gap between APC-funded OA and toll-access articles, and the citation advantage of the APC-funded OA articles was apparently a sustainable phenomenon. Moreover, the number of the APC-funded OA articles increased in comparison with that of the toll-gated articles. In addition, the APC-funded OA articles exhibited citation advantages in almost all fields.

Keywords

APC Article processing charges Author-pays model Sustainability Hybrid open access journals Open access citation advantage 

References

  1. Abad, M. F. (2009). Financial aspects of open access journals. Contributions to Science, 5, 107–114.Google Scholar
  2. Aguzzi, A. (2015). Scientific publishing in the times of open access. Swiss Medical Weekly, 145, w14118.Google Scholar
  3. Akhtar, J. (2015). Issue of open access and predatory journals. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons-Pakistan, 25(5), 313–314.Google Scholar
  4. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archambault, É., Côté, G., Struck, B., & Voorons, M. (2016). Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers. 1science/Science-Metrix Report. http://www.1science.com/PDF/oaNumber_OACA_3million_paper.pdf.
  6. Åström, F. (2008). Citation patterns in open access journals. Unpublished project report: The OpenAccess. se program, The National Library of Sweden.Google Scholar
  7. Beall, J. (2013). Medical publishing triage–chronicling predatory open access publishers. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2(2), 47–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernius, S., & Hanauske, M. (2009). Open access to scientific literature-increasing citations as an incentive for authors to make their publications freely accessible. In 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2009. HICSS’09 (pp. 1–9). IEEE.Google Scholar
  9. Bernius, S., Hanauske, M., König, W., & Dugall, B. (2009). Open access models and their implications for the players on the scientific publishing market. Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Björk, B. C. (2004). Open access to scientific publications—An analysis of the barriers to change? Information Research, 9(2). https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10227/647/bjork.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
  11. Björk, B. C. (2012). The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1496–1504.Google Scholar
  12. Björk, B. C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Björk, B. C., & Paetau, P. (2012). Open access to the scientific journal literature–status and challenges for the information systems community. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 38(5), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Björk, B. C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2009). Scientific journal publishing: Yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research, 14(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ837278.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
  15. Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2012a). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2012b). Pricing principles used by scholarly open access publishers. Learned Publishing, 25(2), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2015). Article processing charges in OA journals: Relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics, 103(2), 373–385.Google Scholar
  18. Björk, B. C., Welling, P., & Laakso, M. (2011). Open accessibility to information systems research articles. In ECIS 2011 Proceedings (Vol. 149). http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2011/149. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
  19. Carr, L., Swan, A., Sale, A., Oppenheim, C., Brody, T., Hitchcock, S., et al. (2006). Repositories for institutional open access: Mandated deposit policies. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/263099/2/abs77.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  20. Chaudhuri, J., & Thohira, M. (2010). Usage of open-access journals: Findings from eleven top science and medical journals. The Serials Librarian, 58(1–4), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chi Chang, C. (2006). Business models for open access journals publishing. Online Information Review, 30(6), 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coonin, B. (2011). Open access publishing in business research: The authors’ perspective. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(3), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Goerner, B., Darby, R., Hyppoelae, J., Igo-Kemenes, P., Kahn, D., et al. (2010). Open access publishing-models and attributes. http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:1759194/component/escidoc:1759193/SOAP_OAP_models_attr_long.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  24. Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  25. Dorta-González, P., González-Betancor, S. M., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2017). Reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context: An analysis of the subject categories in the Web of Science database 2009–2014. Scientometrics, 112(2), 877–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dorta-González, P., & Santana-Jiménez, Y. (2017). Prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the Scopus database. Research evaluation (on-line first) https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/doi/10.1093/reseval/rvx035/4345793/Prevalence-and-citation-advantage-of-gold-open?guestAccessKey=bbf9dc3e-a171-4366-9032-323b4bdf980d.
  27. Doty, R. C. (2013). Tenure-Track Science Faculty and the ‘Open Access Citation Effect’. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(3), eP1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1052.
  28. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frandsen, T. F. (2009). Attracted to open access journals: A bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology. Journal of Documentation, 65(1), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.3664.
  32. Gaule, P., & Maystre, N. (2011). Getting cited: Does open access help? Research Policy, 40(10), 1332–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/0606079.
  34. Harnad, S. (2006). Publish or perish—Self-archive to flourish: The green route to open access. ERCIM News, 64https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/261715/1/harnad-ercim.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
  35. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6). https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/260207. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.
  36. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2008). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update. Serials review, 34(1), 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ho, A. K., (2011). Hybrid Journals: Transition to Full Open Access or Here to Stay?  Western Libraries Publications. Paper 28. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wlpub/28. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.
  38. Hunter, R., Alessandrini, D., & Williams, T. (2012). Why we oppose gold open access. feminists@ law, 2(2). http://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/59/178. Accessed 15 June 2015.
  39. Jeon, D. S., & Rochet, J. C. (2010). The pricing of academic journals: A two-sided market perspective. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(2), 222–255.Google Scholar
  40. Koler Povh, T., Turk, G., & Južnič, P. (2013). Does the Open Access business model have a significant impact on the citation of publications? Case study in the field of civil engineering.  https://doi.org/10.5937/BIOAC-68. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
  41. Kousha, K., & Abdoli, M. (2010). The citation impact of Open Access agricultural research: A comparison between OA and non-OA publications. Online Information Review, 34(5), 772–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Hybrid open access: A longitudinal study. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 919–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible. Nature, 411(6837), 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin, S. K. (2007). Non-open access and its adverse impact on molecules. Molecules, 12, 1436–1437.Google Scholar
  45. McVeigh, M. (2004). Open Access journals in the ISI citation database: Analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. London: Thomson Scientific.Google Scholar
  46. Mittermaier, B. (2015). Double dipping in hybrid open access—Chimera or reality? ScienceOpen Research.  https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.AOWNTU.v1.
  47. Morrison, H. (2017). Elsevier: Among the world’s largest open access publishers as of 2016. The Charleston Advisor, 53–59.  https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.18.3.53.
  48. Moskovkin, V. M. (2008). Open access hybrid journals. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35(6), 260–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mounce, R. (2013). Open access and altmetrics: Distinct but complementary. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mueller-Langer, F., & Watt, R. (2014). The hybrid open access citation advantage: How many more cites is a $3,000 fee buying you? https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61801/. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
  51. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963–1972.Google Scholar
  52. Ottaviani, J. (2016). The post-embargo open access citation advantage: It exists (probably), it’s modest (usually), and the rich get richer (of course). PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0159614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Papin-Ramcharan, J., & Dawe, R. A. (2006). The other side of the coin for open access publishing—A developing country view. Libri, 56(1), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pinfield, S. (2006). A Wel (l) come development: Research funders and open access. Learned Publishing, 19(3), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pinfield, S. (2010). Paying for open access? Institutional funding streams and OA publication charges. Learned Publishing, 23(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., et al. (2017). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ Preprints, 5, e3119v1.  https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119v1.Google Scholar
  57. Polonioli, A. (2016). Debunking unwarranted defenses of the status quo in the humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1519–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sabharwal, S., Patel, N., & Johal, K. (2014). Open access publishing: A study of current practices in orthopaedic research. International Orthopaedics, 38(6), 1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012a). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98–107.Google Scholar
  60. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012b). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485–1495.Google Scholar
  61. Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). The citation advantage of author-pays model: The case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics, 104(2), 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2007). The citation performance of open access journals: A disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2145–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2008). Great expectations: The role of Open Access in improving countries’ recognition. Scientometrics, 76(1), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2009). Countries positioning in Open Access Journals system: An investigation of citation distribution patterns. Scientometrics, 81(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swan, A. (2010). The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268516/2/Citation_advantage_paper.pdf.
  67. van Dorp, L. (2012). Going for gold: An investigation into financial models of open access publishing in biology and the life sciences. Methodology, 10, 12.Google Scholar
  68. Vogel, G. (2011). Open access gains support; fees and journal quality deter submissions. Science, 331(6015), 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wagner, A. B. (2016). Open access citation advantage: An annotated bibliography. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.  https://doi.org/10.5062/F4Q81B0W.
  70. Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weber, D. (2009). Hybrid OA journals: A progression or a destination? http://eprints.rclis.org/13744/1/Hybrid_OA_Journals.pdf.
  72. Wray, K. B. (2016a). No new evidence for a citation benefit for Author-Pay Open Access Publications in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1031–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wray, K. B. (2016b). Still no new evidence: Author-Pay Open Access in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1527–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xia, J. F., Myers, R. L., & Wilhoite, S. K. (2011). Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 37, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Knowledge and Information Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Eram CampusShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations