This paper investigates the academic and societal impacts of the engineering electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) at the North-West University. The citation counts obtained through Google Scholar (GS) and the altmetrics data obtained from Dspace on the North-West University institutional repository are used to determine these impacts. Further, the conversion rates of ETDs from an educational output into an academic research output are determined using data from GS and the North-West University institutional repository. The results show that the 612 theses and dissertations attracted 931 citations which translates to 1.52 citations per thesis on average. A total of 41.2% theses and dissertations received at least one citation and the conversion rate into academic research output was 16.8%. The conversion rates in the last 3 years that are part of this research is 27.3% which suggests an improvement. An average of 323 PDF views were received per thesis. The citation and PDF views data show that the Engineering ETDs have commendable academic and societal impacts. Nonetheless, the academic impacts show scant correlation with the societal impacts although some positive trends are noticeable when looking at the origin of PDF views and citations by country.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abrizah, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Can the impact of Non-Western Academic Books be measured? An investigation of Google Books and Google Scholar for Malaysia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2498–2508.
Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2011). Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an environmental sciences perspective. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 77(1), 169–178.
Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2013). Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 727–744.
Ahmed, A., Alreyaee, S., & Rahman, A. (2014). Theses and dissertations in institutional repositories: An Asian perspective. New Library World, 115(9/10), 438–451.
Al-Busaidi, I. S., & Alamri, Y. (2016). Publication rates and characteristics of undergraduate medical theses in New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal, 129(1442), 1175–8716.
Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
Barnes, C. (2015). The use of altmetrics as a tool for measuring research impact. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 46(2), 121–134.
Becker, D. A., & Chiware, E. R. T. (2015). Citation analysis of masters’ theses and doctoral dissertations: Balancing library collections with students’ research information needs. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 613–620.
Bennett, L., & Flannagan, D. (2016). Measuring the impact of digitized theses: A case study from the London School of Economics. Insights, 29(2), 111–119.
Bonato, S. (2016). Google Scholar and Scopus for finding gray literature publications. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(3), 252–254.
Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2014), 895–903.
Buehler, M. A. (2013). Demystifying the institutional repository for success. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Chang, Y. (2016). Influence of human behavior and the principle of least effort on library and information science research. Information Processing and Management, 52(2016), 658–669.
Chilimo, W. (2015). Green open access in Kenya: A review of the content, policies and usage of institutional repositories. Mousaion, 33(2), 25–54.
Clarivate Analytics. (2017). It’s time to get the facts. http://images.info.science.thomsonreuters.biz/Web/ThomsonReutersScience/%7B6f794b61-1d4d-498f-ac25-f7ba4ca08fff%7D_Web_of_Science_Fact_Book.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Cybermetrics Lab. (2017a). Ranking Web of Repositories: Africa. http://repositories.webometrics.info/en/ranking_africa. Accessed May 19, 2017.
Cybermetrics Lab. (2017b). Ranking Web of Repositories: World http://repositories.webometrics.info/en/search/Rankings/boloka. Accessed August 29, 2017.
Debbiche, A. C., Mrabet, A., Abidi, E., & Dziri, C. (2016). Impact of the thesis of pathology supported at the faculty of medicine of Tunisis (2000–2010). The Tunisian Medical Society, 94(03), 172–175.
Ezema, I. J., & Onyancha, O. B. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of health and medical journals: Issues in medical scholarly communication in Africa. Serials Review, 42(2), 116–128.
Ezema, I. J., & Ugwu, C. I. (2013). Electronic theses and dissertations in Nigeria university libraries: Status, challenges and strategies. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 493–507.
Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers’. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 845–859.
Fasae, J. K. (2012). Citation analysis of dissertations and theses submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/741/. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Merlo-Vega, J. A. (2015). Open access repositories as channel of publication scientific grey literature. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (pp. 419–426). Porto, Portugal, October 07–09, 2015.
Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F., Merlo-Vega, J. A., & Martín-Rodero, H. (2016). Providing open access to Ph.D. theses: Visibility and citation benefits. Program, 50(4), 399–416.
Gohain, A., & Saika, M. (2014). Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses submitted to the Department of Chemical Sciences, Tezpur University, Assam. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2–14. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2641&context=libphilprac. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science: New Series, 66(1713), 385–389.
Iroaganachi, M. A., Itsekor, V., & Osinulu, I. (2014). Citation analysis of social science research: A case study of Bachelor Degree Research Project reports of a Nigerian University 2009–2013. Library Philosophy and Practice, Paper 1096. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2807&context=libphilprac. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Jones, A., & Liam, C. (2014). Furthering the research impact of University College Dublin. Dubl + 2n: Dublin Research Repository. http://researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstream/handle/10197/7292/Furthering_Impact_May_2014.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Kayongo, J., & Helm, C. (2012). Relevance of library collections for graduate student research: A citation analysis study of doctoral dissertations at Notre Dame. College & Research Libraries, 73(1), 47–67. http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/issue/archive. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Kohn, K. C., & Gordon, L. (2014). Citation analysis as a tool for collection development and instruction. Collection Management, 39, 275–296.
Lariviera, V., Zuccala, A., & Archambault, E. (2008). The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies. Scientometrics, 74(1), 109–121.
Max Planck Society. (2003). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Munchen. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Meho, L. I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 20(1), 32–36.
Mingers, J., O’Hanley, J. R., & Okunola, M. (2017). Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317762069_Using_Google_Scholar_Institutional_Level_Data_to_Evaluate_the_Quality_of_University_Research. Accessed August 29, 2017.
Mostofa, S. M., Begun, B., & Ul-Islam, M. M. (2015). Impact of institutional repositories (IRS) to improve educational research and scholarly communication with special reference to Bangladesh and India. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 1(1), 1–8.
Mouton, J. (2016). The doctorate in SA: Trends, challenges and constraints. SA Ph.D. Regional Conference: Bloemfontein, 26 February 2016. Available at: http://ir.nrf.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10907/603/mouton_doctorate.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed August 30, 2017.
National Research Foundation. (2015). Statement on Open Access to Research Publications from the National Research Foundation (NRF)-Funded Research. Pretoria: NRF. http://www.nrf.ac.za/media-room/news/statement-open-access-research-publications-national-research-foundation-nrf-funded. Accessed May 22, 2017.
National Research Foundation. (2017). National ETD Portal: South African theses and dissertations. Pretoria: NRF. http://www.netd.ac.za/. May 20, 2017.
Ngoepe, A., Maluleka, J. R., & Onyancha, O. B. (2014). Research collaboration in the archives and records management field across and beyond universities in Africa: An informetric analysis. Mousaion, 32(3), 119–135.
North-West University. (2008). Institutional strategy for research and innovation. Available at: http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/i-research-support/ResearchLinkdocs/SetswanaPDFs/ResearchandInnovationStrategy.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.
North-West University. (2012). Institutional strategy for research, innovation and community engagement 2012–2014. http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/i-research-support/documents/Web_Docs/Strategic%20Plan%20for%20Research%20Innovation%20Community%20Engagement%20May%202012.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Okafor, V. N. (2010). Analysis of research output of academics in science and engineering in Southern Nigerian Universities: An imperative study. South African Journals of Libraries and Information Science, 76(2), 181–189.
Onyancha, O. B. (2009). A citation analysis of Sub-Saharan African LIS journals using Google Scholar. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 19(2), 101–116.
Onyancha, O. (2017). Altmetrics of South African journals: Implications for scholarly impact of South African research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33, 71–91.
Onyancha, O. B., & Ocholla, D. N. (2009). Assessing researchers’ performance in developing countries: Is Google Scholar an alternative? Mousaion, 27(1), 43–64.
Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllon, J. M., Martın-Martın, A., & Lopez-cozar, E. D. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931–949.
Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Google Scholar and the gray literature: A reply to Bonato’s review. EC3 Working Papers, 27, 11 February 2017. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1702/1702.03991.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2017.
Ortega, J. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2015), 39–49.
Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (pp. 263–287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Prins, A. A. M., Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270.
Raju, R., Raju, J., & Claassen, J. (2015). Open scholarship practices reshaping South Africa’s scholarly publishing roadmap. Publications, 3(4), 263–284.
Ratanya, F. C. (2017). Institutional repository: Access and use by academic staff at Egerton University, Kenya. Library Management, 38(4/5), 276–284.
Rehemtula, S., De Lurdes Rosa, M., Leitao, P., & Aviles, R. A. (2014). Altmetrics in institutional repositories: new perspectives for assessing research impact. In 13th International conference libraries in the digital age (LIDA 2014). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305499237_Altmetrics_in_Institutional_Repositories_New_Perspectives_for_Assessing_Research_Impact. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Roemer, R. C., & Borchardt, R. (Eds.). (2015). Meaningful metrics: A 21st-century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics and research impact. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Rosenberg, Z. (2015). Citation analysis of M.A. theses and Ph.D. dissertations in sociology and anthropology: An assessment of library resource usage. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 680–688.
Rumsey, D. J. (2011). Statistics for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Science Foundation Ireland. (2013). Research Impact. Dublin: SFI. http://www.sfi.ie/assets/files/downloads/Funding/Impact/SFI_Research_Impact_2013.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.
Sooryamoorthy, P. (2010). The visibility of engineering research in South Africa, 1975–2005. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(2), 1–12.
South Africa. (2012). National Development Plan: Vision 2030. National Planning Commission, The Presidency, Pretoria. http://www.dac.gov.za/sites/default/files/NDP%202030%20-%20Our%20future%20-%20make%20it%20work_0.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2017.
Tattersall, A. (Ed.). (2016). Altmetrics: a practical guide for librarians, researchers and academics. London: Facet Publishing.
Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2016). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1962–1972.
Thomas, G. (2007). Evaluating the impact of an institutional repository, or positioning innovation between a rock and a hard place. New Review of Information Networking, 13(2), 133–146.
Thomson Reuters. (2008). White Paper using bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2017.
Tsunoda, H., Nishizawa, M., Sun, Y., & Liu, X. (2016). A study on the academic and research impact of shared contents in institutional repositories in related to performance indicators of university rankings. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6.
Van Berge, P. J. (1994). Fischer–Tropsch studies in the slurry phase favouring wax production. Ph.D. thesis. Potchefstroom: NWU. https://repository.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/1597. Accessed September 01, 2017.
Van Wyk, B., & Mostert, J. (2014). African institutional repositories as contributors to global information: A South African case study. Mousaion, 32(1), 98–114.
Vine, R. (2006). Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(1), 97–99.
Wallace, S. (Ed.). (2016). A dictionary of education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, D. P., & Van Fleet, C. (2012). Knowledge into action: Research evaluation in library and information science. California: Libraries Unlimited.
Wolhuter, C.C. (2015). The scholarly impact of doctoral research conducted in the field of education in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(3), 1–13. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/saje/v35n3/13.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.
World Bank and Elsevier. (2014). A decade of development in Sub-Saharan African science, technology, engineering & mathematics research. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/237371468204551128/pdf/910160WP0P126900disclose09026020140.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bangani, S. The impact of electronic theses and dissertations: a study of the institutional repository of a university in South Africa. Scientometrics 115, 131–151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2657-2
- Institutional repositories
- Theses and dissertations
- Google Scholar