The presence of the encyclicals in Web of Science: a bibliometric approach

Abstract

The encyclicals, also known as papal letters, are documents that have a profound influence on the Catholic Church and, as a result, on the West. This research seeks to explore the impact and areas of influence of these documents according to the citations and length they have had in publications indexed in Web of Science. In addition to the nature and citations of the encyclicals spanning the pontificates of Leo XIII and Francis I, this study analyses the characteristics of the citing publications, such as subject matter, co-cited authors as well as the institution and country of publication. The production of encyclicals according to pontificate is irregular. This study shows that encyclicals on social themes are the ones with the greatest impact on science, particularly Rerum Novarum and the encyclicals commemorating it. Beyond the fields of Theology and Philosophy, encyclicals are used as referents in multiple themes, particularly in today’s great social themes of economics, politics, war, well-being, social inequality and human development. Likewise, the fact that the papal letters are co-cited together with great thinkers, such as Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Max Weber, Martin Heidegger, or theologians like Karl Ruhner, indicates their importance. Lastly, Catholic universities are observed be to the principal source of studies in which the encyclicals provide theoretical referents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ahlgren, P., Pagin, P., Persson, O., & Svedberg, M. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: Free will and sorites. Scientometrics, 103, 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1535-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aranda, A. (2007). La unidad entre cristología y antropología en Juan Pablo II. Un análisis del tema en sus catorce encíclicas. Scripta Theologica, 39(1), 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrera, A. (1997). Exchange-value determination: Scholastic just price, economic theory, and modern Catholic social. History of Political Economy, 29(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Batagelj, V. (2008). Analysis of large networks with Pajek. Networks, 22–27. http://www.springerlink.com/index/JFJPG0AN9MM0G81D.pdf.

  5. Berryman, T., & Sauvé, L. (2017). Ruling relationships in sustainable development and education for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1092934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanco, P. (2011). La teología de Joseph Ratzinger. Una introducción. Madrid: Palabra.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bovée, D. S. (2016). The middle way: The National Catholic Rural Life Conference and Rural Issues in the 20th and 21st Centuries. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75(3), 768–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Breen, J. M. (2008). Modesty and moralism: Justice, prudence and abortion—A reply to Skeel & Stunzq. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 31, 219–262.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0024-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Camacho, I. (2016). Laudato sí: el clamor de la tierra y el clamor de los pobres. Una encíclica más que ecológica. Revista de Fomento Social, 71, 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castillo, D. P. (2016). Integral ecology as a liberationist concept. Theological Studies, 77(2), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563916635781.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, C. M. A. (2012). From the Wealth of Nations to Populorum Progressio (on the development of peoples): Wealth and development from the perspective of the Catholic Social thought tradition. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00850.x.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curran, C. E. (1981). The changing anthropological bases of Catholic social ethics. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 45(2), 284–318. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1981.0030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dann, S., & Dann, S. (2016). Exploring Catholic social teaching in a social marketing context: History, lessons and future directions. Journal of Macromarketing, 36(4), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146716641988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Escobar, J. I. (1990). Leon XII: Cien años de la Rerum Novarum. Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 90, 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gelabert, M. (2007). Creados desde y para el amor. Veritas, 16, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gorraiz, J., & Purnell, P. J. (2013). Opportunities for and limitations of the book citation index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1388–1398. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guerrero, F. (1996). El magisterio pontificio contemporáneo. Colección de Encíclicas y Documentos desde León XIII a Juan Pablo II. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heussman, J. W. (1970). The literature cited in theological journals and its relation to seminary library circulation. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horell, H. D. (2016). The imagination of REA: APPRRE. Religious Education, 111(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2016.1199186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoverstad, R. (2008). Catholic social teaching and marketing practices in the global economy. Interbeing, 2(2), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Introvigne, M. (2016). New religious movements and the visual arts. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 19(4), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2016.19.4.3.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1988). A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 41(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(88)90116-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kellsey, C., & Knievel, J. (2005). Citation analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities. The Library Quaterly: Information, Community, Policy, 75(2), 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lusting, A. (1990). Property and justice in the modern encyclical literature. Harvard Theological Review, 83(4), 415–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lusvardi, A. R. (2012). The law of concience. Catholic Teaching on Conscience from Leo XIII to John Paul II. Logos, 15(2), 13–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Müller, G. L. (2014). Iglesia pobre y para los pobres. Madrid: San Pablo.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A., De Bruin, R. E., & Dekker, P. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioural Sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nuzzo, A., Madonna, E., Mazzei, P., Spaccini, R., & Piccolo, A. (2016). In situ photo-polymerization of soil organic matter by heterogeneous nano-TiO2 and biomimetic metal-porphyrin catalysts. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 52, 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1102-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Neill, W. R. (2012). A little common sense: The ethics of immigration in Catholic social teaching. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71(4), 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00854.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peters, T. (2016). The war between faith and fact the war between faith and fact. Theology and Science, 14(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2016.1156326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sivertsen, G. (2009). Publication patterns in all fields. In F. Aström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 55–60). Rio de Janeiro: ISSI.

  33. Sivertsen, G. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science. In Science and technology indicators conference 2014 (pp. 598–604). Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.

  34. Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., Campanario, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2014). Coverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index. Online Information Review, 38(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2012-0169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Turkson, P. C. A. (2012). Caritas in Veritate: Good news for society. Logos, 15(3), 90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ulanowicz, R. E. (2016). Process ecology: Making room for creation. Sophia, 55, 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0529-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vallier, K. (2016). In defence of intelligible reasons in public justification. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(264), 596–616. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Whalen, M. L. (1965). The literature used in Catholic and Protestant research in theology. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  40. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers for their corrections and the suggestion to incorporate the length of the encyclicals into the study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Repiso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Repiso, R., Ahedo, J. & Montero, J. The presence of the encyclicals in Web of Science: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 115, 487–500 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2636-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Encyclicals
  • Web of Science
  • Theology
  • Non-source documents
  • Bibliometric analysis