Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 487–500 | Cite as

The presence of the encyclicals in Web of Science: a bibliometric approach

  • Rafael RepisoEmail author
  • Josu Ahedo
  • Julio Montero
Article
  • 683 Downloads

Abstract

The encyclicals, also known as papal letters, are documents that have a profound influence on the Catholic Church and, as a result, on the West. This research seeks to explore the impact and areas of influence of these documents according to the citations and length they have had in publications indexed in Web of Science. In addition to the nature and citations of the encyclicals spanning the pontificates of Leo XIII and Francis I, this study analyses the characteristics of the citing publications, such as subject matter, co-cited authors as well as the institution and country of publication. The production of encyclicals according to pontificate is irregular. This study shows that encyclicals on social themes are the ones with the greatest impact on science, particularly Rerum Novarum and the encyclicals commemorating it. Beyond the fields of Theology and Philosophy, encyclicals are used as referents in multiple themes, particularly in today’s great social themes of economics, politics, war, well-being, social inequality and human development. Likewise, the fact that the papal letters are co-cited together with great thinkers, such as Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Max Weber, Martin Heidegger, or theologians like Karl Ruhner, indicates their importance. Lastly, Catholic universities are observed be to the principal source of studies in which the encyclicals provide theoretical referents.

Keywords

Encyclicals Web of Science Theology Non-source documents Bibliometric analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers for their corrections and the suggestion to incorporate the length of the encyclicals into the study.

References

  1. Ahlgren, P., Pagin, P., Persson, O., & Svedberg, M. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: Free will and sorites. Scientometrics, 103, 47–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1535-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranda, A. (2007). La unidad entre cristología y antropología en Juan Pablo II. Un análisis del tema en sus catorce encíclicas. Scripta Theologica, 39(1), 37–72.Google Scholar
  3. Barrera, A. (1997). Exchange-value determination: Scholastic just price, economic theory, and modern Catholic social. History of Political Economy, 29(1), 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batagelj, V. (2008). Analysis of large networks with Pajek. Networks, 22–27. http://www.springerlink.com/index/JFJPG0AN9MM0G81D.pdf.
  5. Berryman, T., & Sauvé, L. (2017). Ruling relationships in sustainable development and education for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 104–117.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1092934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco, P. (2011). La teología de Joseph Ratzinger. Una introducción. Madrid: Palabra.Google Scholar
  7. Bovée, D. S. (2016). The middle way: The National Catholic Rural Life Conference and Rural Issues in the 20th and 21st Centuries. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75(3), 768–808.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breen, J. M. (2008). Modesty and moralism: Justice, prudence and abortion—A reply to Skeel & Stunzq. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 31, 219–262.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(2), 327–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0024-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camacho, I. (2016). Laudato sí: el clamor de la tierra y el clamor de los pobres. Una encíclica más que ecológica. Revista de Fomento Social, 71, 59–79.Google Scholar
  11. Castillo, D. P. (2016). Integral ecology as a liberationist concept. Theological Studies, 77(2), 353–376.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563916635781.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, C. M. A. (2012). From the Wealth of Nations to Populorum Progressio (on the development of peoples): Wealth and development from the perspective of the Catholic Social thought tradition. American Journal of Economics and Sociology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00850.x.Google Scholar
  13. Curran, C. E. (1981). The changing anthropological bases of Catholic social ethics. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 45(2), 284–318.  https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1981.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dann, S., & Dann, S. (2016). Exploring Catholic social teaching in a social marketing context: History, lessons and future directions. Journal of Macromarketing, 36(4), 412–424.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146716641988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Escobar, J. I. (1990). Leon XII: Cien años de la Rerum Novarum. Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 90, 377–392.Google Scholar
  16. Gelabert, M. (2007). Creados desde y para el amor. Veritas, 16, 9–24.Google Scholar
  17. Gorraiz, J., & Purnell, P. J. (2013). Opportunities for and limitations of the book citation index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1388–1398.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerrero, F. (1996). El magisterio pontificio contemporáneo. Colección de Encíclicas y Documentos desde León XIII a Juan Pablo II. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.Google Scholar
  19. Heussman, J. W. (1970). The literature cited in theological journals and its relation to seminary library circulation. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  20. Horell, H. D. (2016). The imagination of REA: APPRRE. Religious Education, 111(4), 349–365.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2016.1199186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoverstad, R. (2008). Catholic social teaching and marketing practices in the global economy. Interbeing, 2(2), 19–30.Google Scholar
  22. Introvigne, M. (2016). New religious movements and the visual arts. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 19(4), 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2016.19.4.3.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1988). A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 41(1), 43–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(88)90116-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kellsey, C., & Knievel, J. (2005). Citation analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities. The Library Quaterly: Information, Community, Policy, 75(2), 142–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lusting, A. (1990). Property and justice in the modern encyclical literature. Harvard Theological Review, 83(4), 415–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lusvardi, A. R. (2012). The law of concience. Catholic Teaching on Conscience from Leo XIII to John Paul II. Logos, 15(2), 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Müller, G. L. (2014). Iglesia pobre y para los pobres. Madrid: San Pablo.Google Scholar
  28. Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A., De Bruin, R. E., & Dekker, P. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioural Sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 423–435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nuzzo, A., Madonna, E., Mazzei, P., Spaccini, R., & Piccolo, A. (2016). In situ photo-polymerization of soil organic matter by heterogeneous nano-TiO2 and biomimetic metal-porphyrin catalysts. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 52, 585–593.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1102-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Neill, W. R. (2012). A little common sense: The ethics of immigration in Catholic social teaching. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71(4), 988–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00854.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peters, T. (2016). The war between faith and fact the war between faith and fact. Theology and Science, 14(2), 143–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2016.1156326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sivertsen, G. (2009). Publication patterns in all fields. In F. Aström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 55–60). Rio de Janeiro: ISSI.Google Scholar
  33. Sivertsen, G. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science. In Science and technology indicators conference 2014 (pp. 598–604). Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
  34. Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., Campanario, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2014). Coverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index. Online Information Review, 38(1), 24–42.  https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2012-0169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turkson, P. C. A. (2012). Caritas in Veritate: Good news for society. Logos, 15(3), 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ulanowicz, R. E. (2016). Process ecology: Making room for creation. Sophia, 55, 357–380.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0529-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vallier, K. (2016). In defence of intelligible reasons in public justification. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(264), 596–616.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whalen, M. L. (1965). The literature used in Catholic and Protestant research in theology. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  40. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)LogroñoSpain

Personalised recommendations