Community evolution analysis based on co-author network: a case study of academic communities of the journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”
- 597 Downloads
Academic community evolution reveals the development of scientific collaboration among scientists. These social interactions of researchers can be well reflected by co-author network, making it feasible to investigate academic community through looking into co-author network, and to study community evolution through dynamic co-author network analysis. Existing metrics measure an author’s impact or centrality in co-author network individually, rather than considering the academic community as a whole. Besides, co-authors of a paper usually make different contributions reflected in the name order, which is often ignored in traditional co-author network analysis. Furthermore, attention has been paid mainly on those structure-level characteristics like the small-world coefficient and the clustering coefficient, the content-level characteristics like community, author, and topics, however, are crucial in the understanding of community evolution. To address those problems, we firstly propose a “comprehensive impact index” to evaluate the author in a co-author network by comprehensively considering the statistic-based impact and the network-based centrality. Then the comprehensive index value of all authors in a community is added up to evaluate the community as a whole. Further, a lifecycle strategy is proposed for the community evolution analysis. Taking geography academic community as a pilot study, we select 919 co-authored papers from the flagship journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”. The co-author groups are generated by community detection method. Top three co-author groups are identified through computing with the proposed index and analyzed through the proposed lifecycle strategy from perspective of community structures, member authors, and impacts respectively. The results demonstrate our proposed index and strategy are more efficient for analyzing academic community evolution than traditional methods.
KeywordsAnnals of the Association of American Geographers Co-author network Community detection Lifecycle analysis
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41371370; 41371372), the Major State Research Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0502301), and the Grand Special of High Resolution On Earth Observation: Application demonstration system of high resolution remote sensing and transportation (Grant No: 07-Y30B10-9001-14/16). Thanks Mr. Stephen C. McClure and Miss Julie Yu for helping us with the English revisions.
- Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM, 8, 361–362.Google Scholar
- Chen, C., & Morris, S. (2003). Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. In IEEE symposium on information visualization (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714), 21 Oct 2003 (pp. 67–74).Google Scholar
- Garfield, E., & Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Liang, X. (2015). The changing impact of geographic distance: A preliminary analysis on the co-author networks in scientometrics (1983–2013). In 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 5–8 Jan 2015 (pp. 722–731).Google Scholar
- Mali, F., Kronegger, L., Doreian, P., & Ferligoj, A. (2012). Dynamic scientific co-authorship networks. In A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Models of science dynamics: Encounters between complexity theory and information sciences (pp. 195–232). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, G. J. (2005). All possible worlds: A history of geographical ideas. Oxford University Press. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780195168709.
- Mutschke, P. (2003). Mining networks and central entities in digital libraries. A graph theoretic approach applied to co-author networks. In M. R. Berthold, H.-J. Lenz, E. Bradley, R. Kruse & C. Borgelt (Eds.), Advances in intelligent data analysis V. 5th international symposium on intelligent data analysis, IDA 2003, Berlin, Germany, 28–30 Aug 2003 (pp. 155–166). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zaïane, O. R., Chen, J., & Goebel, R. (2009). Mining research communities in bibliographical data. In H. Zhang, M. Spiliopoulou, B. Mobasher, C. L. Giles, A. McCallum, O. Nasraoui et al. (Eds.), Advances in web mining and web usage analysis. 9th international workshop on knowledge discovery on the web, WebKDD 2007, and 1st international workshop on social networks analysis, SNA-KDD 2007, San Jose, CA, USA, 12–15 Aug 2007. Revised Papers (pp. 59–76). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, C., Bu, Y., & Ding, Y. (2016). Understanding scientific collaboration from the perspective of collaborators and their network structures. In IConference 2016 Proceedings.Google Scholar