Quantitative study on Australian academic science
- 408 Downloads
As at the end of 2009, 50 million scholarly papers were in existence, and changes in the global higher education sector are seeing this number grow rapidly. With the impact of university ranking schemes, dramatic changes have occurred in the academic publication system; both the number of publications, and the number of scholars, are increasing rapidly. In this research, we conduct a focused study on the quantitative relationships in Australian academic science. Sample data is selected from three institutions, representing three types of universities in Australia: a leading university, a middle-tier university, and a non-comprehensive university. For our analysis, bibliometric data for 32,056 scholars and 353,334 publications are downloaded. The results show that varying growth rates for scholars (5.6, 6.1, and 7.7%) and journal publications (6.7, 7.4, and 9.7%) for the leading university, the middle-tier university, and the non-comprehensive university respectively. We also evaluate how scholarly publications differ across these three Australian universities types from six aspects: average number of publications per scholar, percentage of first-authored publications, collaboration pattern, average SJR score of publishing journals, percentage of Quartile category of publishing journals, and average citation per publication. Lastly, we consider how the scholarship life-cycle varies in Australian universities in terms of publishing age, thus establishing the quantitative relationship between scholarship life-cycle and publishing performance in Australian universities.
KeywordsScholars Publications Australian universities Scholarship life cycle Collaboration Academic science
Mathematics Subject Classification94A99
- Björk, B.-C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2008). Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different open access options. Paper presented at the ELPUB2008.Google Scholar
- Blake, G., & Bly, R. W. (1993). The elements of technical writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
- Education Counts. (2014). 2013 age profile of the academic staff in universities, polytechnics and wānanga. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/80898/145849.
- Elsevier. (2016). Scopus. from Elsevier http://www.scopus.com/.
- Hazelkorn, E. (2009). Impact of global rankings on higher education research and the production of knowledge. Uneso Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, Occasional Paper No. 18. doi: 10.21427/D7BG9J.
- Hazelkorn, E. (2013). How rankings are reshaping higher education? Paper presented at the IAU 13th general conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Hugo, G. (2008). The demographic outlook for Australian universities’ academic staff. Retrieved from https://www.chass.org.au/papers/pdf/PAP20081101GH.pdf.
- Jacot, A. P. (1937). Principles of scientific publication. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 45(1), 127–129.Google Scholar
- Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search—Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science Bangalore, 89(9), 1537.Google Scholar
- Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132.Google Scholar
- Marginson, S. (1997). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987/1997. Australian Universities’ Review, 40(1), 5.Google Scholar
- Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Where to from here. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Quacquarelli Symonds Limited. (2016). QS world university rankings. Retrieved from http://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings.
- Regional Universities Network. (2016). Funding cuts will hurt Australia’ regional universities and students. Retrieved from http://www.run.edu.au/cb_pages/news/Funding_cuts_response.php.
- Scopus. SCImago Journal & Country Rank—Journal Rankings. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php.
- Shanghai JiaoTong University. (2016). Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2016.html.
- Times Higher Education. (2016). THE world university ranking. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2016/world-ranking.
- U.S. News and World Report. (2016). USNWR best global universities ranking. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/rankings?int=a27a09.