Development of a semi-automatic bibliometric system for publications on animal health and welfare: a methodological study
- 254 Downloads
Bibliometrics is a common research instrument for systemic analysis of scientific progress in many disciplines, including veterinary sciences. However, bibliometric analyses are generally biased by limited information included in scientific productions databases. The aim of this study is to propose a method for implementing databases on livestock health and welfare in a bibliometric perspective. By using the detailed classification of the scientific disciplines and the list of keywords of the CAB Abstracts®, queries were first built to combine 120 descriptors related to animal species and 1680 descriptors related to the given thematics. Then, the extraction was done from the Web of Science®. The overall process focused on the research institutes localised in Europe and on publications written in English. To assess the database accuracy, supplementary filters were validated and applied to discard non-specific terms and neighbouring topics. Additional fields for species groups, infectious and non-infectious diseases, welfare components and geographical regions were incorporated according to thematic terminologies specifically established. The final database contains 57,523 articles published over a 12 years’ period (2003–2014). The developed method, based on the complementary use of both the CAB Abstracts® and Web of Science®, can be a reference to allow an adequate semi-automatic retrieval of relevant publications on livestock health and welfare, which will be of use to implement bibliometric study to produce a realistic assessment of tendency for driving science policy. Interestingly, it can be also a model process to be easily applied to implement bibliometric studies for any other scientific thematic domain.
KeywordsAnimal health and welfare Bibliometrics Database accuracy Research coordination
This study was supported by the European Commission under the ANIHWA ERA-Net project (Seventh Framework Programme, Project No. 291815). The authors wish to thank Christelle Boizeau for her significant contribution in establishing thematic terminologies.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
- Arya, C. (2012). Authorship trends and collaborative research in the field of veterinary medicine. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2(1), 50–53.Google Scholar
- Crawley-Low, J. (2006). Bibliometric analysis of the American journal of veterinary research to produce a list of core veterinary medicine journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(4), 430–434.Google Scholar
- Hruska, K. (2006). Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic: Analysis of papers published from 1990 to 2005. Veterinarni Medicina Czech, 51(5), 161–167.Google Scholar
- Izmirli, S. (2014). The scientific evaluation of animal welfare publications. In Proceedings of Ochrana zvířat a welfare 2014 (animal protection and welfare 2014), Vol. 2, pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
- Le Bail, P. Y., Bugeon, J., Dameron, O., Fatet, A., Golik, W., Hocquette, J. F., et al. (2014). Un langage de référence pour le phénotypage des animaux d’élevage : l’ontologie ATOL. INRA Productions Animales, 27(3), 195–208.Google Scholar
- Noyons, E., & Calero Medina, C. (2012). Results of the bibliometric study on the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the Utrecht University 2001–2010 (p. 39). CWTS: Final Report.Google Scholar
- Rana, S. M., & Agarwal, S. (1994). Authorship trends in Indian wildlife and fisheries literature—A bibliometric study. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 41(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
- Reinert, M. (1983). Une méthode de classification de descendante hiérarchique: Application à l’analyse lexicale par contexte. Les cahiers de l’analyse des données, 8(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
- Reinert, M. (1986). Un logiciel d’analyse lexicale: ALCESTE. Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 4, 471–484.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (1946). Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June (entered into force on 7 April 1948).Google Scholar