Aaltojarvi, I., Arminen, I., Auranen, O., & Pasanen, H.-M. (2008). Scientific productivity, web visibility and citation patterns in sixteen Nordic sociology departments. Acta Sociologica,
51(1), 5–22. doi:10.1177/0001699307086815.
Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2010). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics,
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. Scientometrics,
81(1), 137–156. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2131-7.
Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked : The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Pub.
Bentley, P. J. (2015). Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities. Scientometrics,
102(1), 865–883. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1430-4.
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013). Individual differences in faculty research time allocations across 13 countries. Research in Higher Education,
54(3), 329–348. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4.
Black, P. E. (2004). Bradford’s law. In V. Pieterse & P. E. Black (Eds.), Dictionary of algorithms and data structures (online).
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review,
Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review,
Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, J. R., & Singer, B. (1991). A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 277–310). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Ductor, L. (2015). Does co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,
Egghe, L. (2005). Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
56(7), 664–668. doi:10.1002/asi.20157.
Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Science,
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science,
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA,
295(1), 90–93. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics,
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015). The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: Possibilities, limitations and adverse effects. In I. M. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and performance: Governance of research organizations (pp. 121–139). Achsa: Springer.
Keith, B., & Babchuk, N. (1998). The quest for institutional recognition: A longitudinal analysis of scholarly productivity and academic prestige among sociology departments. Social Forces,
Keith, B., Layne, J. S., Babchuk, N., & Johnston, K. (2002). The context of scientific achievement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces,
Kurzman, C., & Owens, L. (2002). The sociology of intellectuals. Annual Review of Sociology,
Kwiek, M. (2015). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education,
Kyvik, S. (1989). Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka’s law. Scientometrics,
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science,
35(5), 673–702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359.
Lotka, A. (1929). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences,
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science Society,
Murray, C. A. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 BC to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.
Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Price, D. J. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,
Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education,
Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., & Hollis, P. R. (2003). Using publications counts to measure an institution’s research productivity. Research in Higher Education,
Yair, G. (2007). Meritocracy. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. VI, pp. 2954–2958). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Yair, G. (2008). Gender, discipline and scientific productivity: The case of Israeli doctoral students. Equal Opportunities International,
Yogev, A. (2000). The stratification of Israeli universities: Implications for higher education policy. Higher Education,
Zheng, J., & Liu, N. (2015). Mapping of important international academic awards. Scientometrics,
104(3), 763–791. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1613-7.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Zuckerman, H. (1991). The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 27–56). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Zuckerman, H. (1996). Scientific elite : Nobel laureates in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.