Scientometrics

, Volume 113, Issue 2, pp 751–764 | Cite as

Publication in 6 rehabilitation professions: a five-year professional-based bibliometric overview

Article

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine is considered as mandatory especially in the field of drugs evaluation but is expanding to other fields such as surgery and medical devices. There is a general perception that EBP is not well developed in rehabilitation professions. Although needed, little is known about clinical research in rehabilitation professions: Are they any publication? What kind of research is published? Are publications indexed in the main database? RECLIP study therefore proposed to answer these questions through a bibliometric overview for 6 rehabilitation professions. A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Cochrane, Pedro, Pascal, Web of Sciences and OTseeker by rehabilitation professionals. The inclusion criteria were the following: originating from Europe, reporting clinical research, in the field of one of the 6 rehabilitation professions (audiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech therapy, orthoptics, psychomotricity), and published between 2007 and 2011. When the search resulted in more than 300 references, a sample of 300 references was drawn. After verification of inclusion criteria, articles were assessed for the publication language, indexation on Pubmed, impact factor and methodology. Among the retrieved references, 25% truly reported European clinical research in the rehabilitation field. The 5 European countries that published the most in rehabilitation field were United Kingdom, Sweden, Netherlands, Germany and France. Concerning methodology, repartition between descriptive, analytic and interventional studies varied greatly according to professions (p value <0.0001). Speech therapy had the most interventional pattern with 89% of publication being interventional followed by physiotherapy and audiology, on the opposite orthoptics was at less than 20%. This first bibliometric overview highlights the fact that there might be a lack of comparative research and that bibliographic searches are not adapted for rehabilitation professions, meaning that practices might not always be based on evidence, but rather on experience. Efforts should be made on indexation, and rehabilitation schools should focus on highlighting research to their students.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Paramedical Publications 

References

  1. ANAES (2000). Conférence de consensus. Prise en charge de la bronchiolite du nourrisson.Google Scholar
  2. Bury, T. (1996). Evidence-based practice—survival of the fittest. Physiotherapy, 82(2), 75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gajdos, V., Katsahian, S., Beydon, N., Abadie, V., de Pontual, L., Larrar, S., et al. (2010). Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Medicine, 7(9), e1000345. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gustafsson, L., & Yates, K. (2009). Are we applying interventions with research evidence when targeting secondary complications of the stroke-affected upper limb. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(6), 428–435. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00757.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McCurtin, A., & Clifford, A. M. (2015). What are the primary influences on treatment decisions? How does this reflect on evidence-based practice? Indications from the discipline of speech and language therapy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1178–1189. doi:10.1111/jep.12385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., & Elkins, M. R. (2011). Reported quality of randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions has improved over time. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(6), 594–601. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Sherrington, C., & Maher, C. G. (2002). Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). [Research Support, Non-US Governmentt]. The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 48(1), 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moseley, A. M., Sherrington, C., Elkins, M. R., Herbert, R. D., & Maher, C. G. (2009). Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, hooked on evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed. Physiotherapy, 95(3), 151–156. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2009.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paci, M., Cigna, C., Baccini, M., & Rinaldi, L. A. (2009). Types of article published in physiotherapy journals: A quantitative analysis. Physiotherapy Research International: The Journal For Researchers and Clinicians in Physical Therapy, 14(4), 203–212. doi:10.1002/pri.447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reynolds, J. (2010). Editorial. American Orthoptic Journal, 60.Google Scholar
  11. Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Maher, C. G., & Moseley, A. M. (2000). PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Manual Therapy, 5(4), 223–226. doi:10.1054/math.2000.0372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Spek, B., Wieringa-de Waard, M., Lucas, C., & van Dijk, N. (2013). Teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) to speech-language therapy students: Are students competent and confident EBP users? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(4), 444–452. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stuwe, L., Parent, M., & Louvet, O. (2015). [5 years after the creation of the Nursing and Paramedical Hospital Research Program of the French Ministry of Health: Issues and challenges]. Recherche en Soins Infirmiers (121), 64–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation RechercheLyonFrance
  2. 2.Université de LyonLyonFrance
  3. 3.Université Lyon 1LyonFrance
  4. 4.Medical WritingParisFrance
  5. 5.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon SudLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations