Scientometrics

, Volume 112, Issue 2, pp 917–925

Relative visibility of authors’ publications in different information services

Article

Abstract

Publication hit lists of authors, institutes, scientific disciplines etc. within scientific databases like Web of Science or Scopus are often used as a basis for scientometric analyses and evaluations of these authors, institutes etc. However, such information services do not necessarily cover all publications of an author. The purpose of this article is to introduce a re-interpreted scientometric indicator called “visibility,” which is the share of the number of an author’s publications on a certain information service relative to the author’s entire œuvre based upon his/her probably complete personal publication list. To demonstrate how the indicator works, scientific publications (from 2001 to 2015) of the information scientists Blaise Cronin (N = 167) and Wolfgang G. Stock (N = 152) were collected and compared with their publication counts in the scientific information services ACM, ECONIS, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, Infodata eDepot, LISTA, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as the social media services Mendeley and ResearchGate. For almost all information services, the visibility amounts to less than 50%. The introduced indicator represents a more realistic view of an author’s visibility in databases than the currently applied absolute number of hits in those databases.

Keywords

Information service Methodology Personal publication lists Publication analysis Relative visibility Scientometric indicator Visibility 

References

  1. Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social web. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 98–109). Montreal: Science-Metrix et OST.Google Scholar
  2. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1968). Visibility and the structural base of awareness of scientific research. American Sociological Review, 33(3), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cronin, B. (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 9(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cronin, B. (2008). On the epistemic significance of place. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1002–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorsch, I., & Frommelius, N. (2015). A scientometric approach to determine and analyze productivity, impact and topics based upon personal publication lists. In F. Pehar, C. Schlögl, & C. Wolff (Eds.), Re:inventing Information Science in the Networked Society. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science (ISI 2015) (pp. 578–580). Glückstadt, Germany: Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
  6. Fitzgerald, R. T., & Radmanesh, A. (2015). Social media and research visibility. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36(4), 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon, A. (2012). The invisibility of science publications in Hebrew: A comparative database study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hilbert, F., Barth, J., Gremm, J., Gros, D., Haiter, J., Henkel, M., et al. (2015). Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media. Personal publication lists as calibration parameters. Online Information Review, 39(2), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holl, A., Makara, G., Micsik, A., & Kovacs, L. (2014). MTMT: The Hungarian scientific bibliography. In Uses of Open Data within Government for Innovation and Efficiency, 2014.06.302014.07.01, Samos. p. 5.Google Scholar
  10. Ingwersen, P. (2000). The international visibility and citation impact of Scandinavian research articles in selected social science fields: The decay of a myth. Scientometrics, 49(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacsó, P. (2008). The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases. Online Information Review, 32(2), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, R., MacGillivray, M., Murray-Rost, P., Pitman, J., Sefton, P., O’Steen, B., et al. (2011). Open bibliography for science, technology, and medicine. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Kirkwood, P. E. (2012). Researcher publication checklist: A quantitative method to compare traditional databases to Web search engines. In 119th American society for engineering education annual conference and exhibition, San Antonio, TX, June 10–13, 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Miguel, S. (2011). Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2015). Metric-wiseness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schlögl, C. (2013). International visibility of European and in particular German-language publications in library and information science. In H.-C. Hobohm (Eds.), Informationswissenschaft zwischen virtueller Infrastruktur und materiellen Lebenswelten. Tagungsband des 13. internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013) (pp. 51–62). Glückstadt: Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
  17. Stock, W. G. (2000). Was ist eine Publikation? Zum Problem der Einheitenbildung in der Wissenschaftsforschung [What is a/one publication? The problem of creating units in scientometrics]. In K. Fuchs-Kittowski, H. Laitko, H. Parthey, & W. Umstätter (Eds.), Wissenschaft und Digitale Bibliothek. Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 1998 (pp. 239–282). Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  18. Wildgaard, L. (2015). A comparison of 17 author-level bibliometric indicators for researchers in astronomy, environmental science, philosophy and public health in Web of Science and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 873–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xin, R. S., Hassanzadeh, O., Fritz, C., Sohrabi, S., & Miller, R. J. (2013). Publishing bibliographic data on the Semantic Web using BibBase. Semantic Web, 4(1), 15–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations