Skip to main content

Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2015). The invariant distribution of references in scientific articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Sugimoto, C. R., & Lariviere, V. (2016). The linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: An approach using n-grams. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1417–1434. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2134-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45, 199–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2017). Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? Scientometrics, 110(2), 937–943. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). The wisdom of citing scientists. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1288–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. (2016). Measuring academic research impact: Creating a citation profile using the conceptual framework for implementation fidelity as a case study. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1329–1340. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2085-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onodera, N. (2016). Properties of an index of citation durability of an article. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 981–1004. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, M. (in press). Letter to the Editor: About the quality and impact of scientific articles. Scientometrics.

  • Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2017). Web indicators for research evaluation: A practical guide. London: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Bornmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press). Scientometrics 111, 1857–1859 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2373-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2373-3

Keywords

  • Natural Language Processing
  • Open Scale
  • Citation Count
  • Impact Measurement
  • Citation Impact