Abercrombie, R., Udoeyop, A., & Schlicher, B. (2012). A study of scientometric methods to identify emerging technologies via modelling of milestones. Scientometrics, 91(2), 327–342.
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604–633.
Ault, G. (1968). Engineering mechanisms and materials. Selected technology for electric power industry. In Proceedings of the NASA SP-5057, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bainbridge, W. (2002). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4, 561–570.
Baldwin, J., & Da Pont, M. (1996). Innovation in Canadian manufacturing enterprises: Survey of innovation and advanced technology 1993. Cat. No. 88-513-XPB, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
Baldwin, J. R., & Sabourin, D. (2002). Advanced technology use and firm performance in Canadian manufacturing in the 1990s. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 761–789.
Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organization, 7, 16–30.
Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 271–282.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2006). A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28(4), 466–484.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.
Bowman, D., & Hodge, G. (2006). Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier. Futures, 38, 1060–1073.
Boyer, K., Leong, G., Ward, P., & Krajewski, L. (1997). Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies. Journal of Operations Management, 15, 331–347.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (2002). The social capital of structural holes. In M. F. Guillén, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Russell (Eds.), New directions in economic sociology (pp. 203–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Foundation.
Cobb, M., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395–405.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990b). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? The American Journal of Sociology, 89, 111–139.
Daim, T., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 981–1012.
Dangayach, G., & Deshmukh, S. (2004). Advanced manufacturing technologies: Evidences from Indian automobile companies. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 6(5), 426–433.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, Maryland, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: Scarecrow Press.
Dernis, H., Squicciarini, M., & de Pinho, R. (2016). Detecting the emergence of technologies and the evolution and co-development trajectories in science (DETECTS): a ‘burst’analysis-based approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 930–960.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.
Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012a). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153.
Fagerberg, J., Landström, H., & Martin, B. R. (2012b). Exploring the emerging knowledge base of ‘the knowledge society’. Research Policy, 41(7), 1121–1131.
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218–233.
Frickel, S., & Gross, N. (2005). A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review, 70(2), 204–232.
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132.
Glänzel, W. (1996). A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992. Scientometrics, 35(3), 291–307.
Glanzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1995). A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science, 21(1), 37–53.
Gmür, M. (1973). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 51(1), 27–57.
Gokhberg, L., Fursov, K., Miles, I., & Perani, G. (2013). Developing and using indicators of emerging and enabling technologies. In F. Gault (Ed.), Handbook of innovation indicators and measurement (pp. 349–380). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.
Halaweh, M. (2013). Emerging technology: What is it? Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(3), 108–115.
Hung, S.-C., & Chu, Y.-Y. (2006). Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: Challenges for the public sector. Technovation, 26(1), 104–110.
Kadyrova, A., & Fursov, K. (2016). Evolution of advanced technology studies: Searching for a communication core. In Supplementary proceedings of the 5th international conference on analysis of images, social networks and texts (AIST-SUP 2016), Yekaterinburg, Russia, April 7–9 (pp. 51–61).
Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of economic literature, 42(3), 752–782.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Leavitt, H. (1951). Some effects of communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303–1319.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247–264.
Manyika J., Chui M., Bughin J., Dobbs R., Bisson P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/disruptive-technologies.
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (1973). Sistema svyazey mezhdu documentami, postroennaya na osnove ssylok: po dannym Science citation index. Nauchno-Tehnicheskaya Informatsiya, 2(6), 3–8 (in Russian).
Martin, B. (1995). Foresight in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7(2), 139–168.
Merton, R. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, 2: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(299), 606–623.
Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10(1), 51–82.
Mullins, N. C. (1973). The development of specialties in social science: The case of ethnomethodology. Science Studies, 3(3), 245–273.
OECD. (1994). Frascati manual 1993: Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2013: Innovation for growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Jin, X.-Y., & Newman, N. C. (2002). Measuring national emerging technology capabilities. Science and Public Policy, 29(3), 189–200.
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Renn, O., & Roco, M. (2006). Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8, 153–191.
Robinson, A. L. (1974). Energy storage. II. Developing advanced technologies. Science, 184(4139).
Robinson, D., & Propp, T. (2008). Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(4), 517–538.
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 44(10), 1827–1843.
Scheufele, D., & Lewenstein, B. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 659–667.
Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.
Scott, C. (1973). Health care delivery and advanced technology. Science, 180(4039), 1339–1342.
SEC. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the committee of the regions. In Preparing for our future: Developing a common strategy for key enabling technologies in the EU (1257). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0512.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2011). Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by the citation network analysis of scientific publications. Technology Forecasting and of Social Change, 78(2), 274–282.
Slovic, P., & Weber, E. U. (2002). Perception of risk posed by extreme events. The Conference on risk management strategies in an uncertain world, April 12–13, 2002, Palisades, New York, 1–21.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(2), 265–269.
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813.
Small, H. (2004). On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics, 60(1), 71–79.
Small, H., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43(8), 1450–1467.
Smith, S. (1950). Communication pattern and the adaptability of task-oriented groups: An experimental study. Cambridge, MA: Group Networks Laboratory, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Solo, R. (1966). The capacity to assimilate an advanced technology. American Economic Review, 56, 91–97.
Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.
Utterback, J. (1994a). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Utterback, J. M. (1994b). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Venables, P. (1962). The colleges of advanced technologies. Chemistry & Industry, 36, 1596–1599.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94, 851–872.
Wang, L., Notten, A., & Surpatean, A. (2013). Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: A keyword mining approach. Scientometrics, 94(3), 877–892.
Wernimont, P., & Campbell, J. (1968). Signs, samples and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(5), 372–376.
Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107–2118.
Youssef, M. (1992). Getting to know advanced manufacturing technologies. Industrial Enginerering, 24(2), 40–42.