Abstract
International collaboration in research is increasingly recognized as an important component of both research and internationalization priorities by higher education institutions. This study analyzed the input–output trends of international research collaboration at five U.S. public universities using quantitative research metrics. We also tested these set of metrics to understand its individual direct relationship with international research collaboration using binary logistic regression. Results showed that international faculty, research funding, research influence, and academic impact were statistically significant (P < 0.05) and can serve as single predictors of international research collaboration for the five universities. Findings should provide international officers and research managers with clear sample data and metrics, and their association to make judgments and decisions on the value and impact of international research collaborations as they relate to overall research progress, productivity and research quality of U.S. universities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi, A., & Jaafari, A. (2013). Research impact and scholars’ geographical diversity. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 683–692.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. (2014). Research evaluation: Improvisation or science? In W. Blockmans, L. Engwall, & D. Weaire (Eds.), Wenner-Gren international series, volume 87 bibliometrics: Use and abuse in the review of research performance (pp. 55–63). Portland: 2014 Portland Press Limited 5.
Adams, J., Black, G., Clemmons, J., & Stephan, P. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259–285.
Aksnes, D. W., Frølich, N., & Slipersæter, S. (2008). Science policy and the driving forces behind the internationalisation of science: The case of Norway. Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 445–457.
Alnuaimi, T., Singh, J., & George, G. (2012). Not with my own: Long-term effects of cross-country collaboration on subsidiary innovation in emerging economies versus advanced economies. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 943–968.
Anderson, M. (2011). International research collaborations: Anticipating challenges instead of being surprised. The Europa World of Learning, 2011, 1–11.
Arundel, A., Colecchia, A., & Wyckoff, A. (2006). Rethinking science and technology indicators for innovation policy in the 21st century. In F. Gault & L. Earl (Eds.), Innovation and impacts: The next decade (pp. 167–197). Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: Impact on research performance. Social Geography, 3(1), 23–36.
Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaborations (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599–616.
Brousseau, E. (1993). L’economie des contrats. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Chang, H.-W., & Huang, M.-H. (2015). The effects of research resources on international collaboration in the astonomy community. Journal for the Association of Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2489–2510.
Charlton, B. G., & Andras, P. (2007). Evaluating universities using simple scientometric research-output metrics: Total citation counts per university for a retrospective seven-year rolling sample. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 555–563.
European Union. (2009). Drivers of international collaboration in research. Brussels: Director-General for Research International Cooperation.
Cooke, J., Ariss, S., Smith, C., & Read, J. (2015). On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: A method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13(25), 1–11.
Davis, P. (2009). Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation. West Sussex: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.
Dresbeck, R. (2015). SciVal. Journal of Medicine Library Association, 103(3), 164–166.
Ducor, P. (2000). Coauthorship and Coinventorship. Science, 289(5481), 873–875.
Fernández-Zubieta, A., & Lawson, C. (2015). What do we know of the mobility of research scientists and impact on scientific production. In A. Geuna (Ed.), Global mobility of research scientists (pp. 1–33). Elsevier.
Fitjar, R., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2014). The geographical dimension of innovation collaboration: Networking and innovation in Norway. Urban Studies, 51(12), 2572–2595.
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.
Freeman, R., Ganguli, I., & Murciano-Goroff, R. (2014). Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaborations. NBER Working Paper No. 19819, pp. 1–41.
Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 222–232.
Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., Schwartzman, S., Trow, M., & Scott, P. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Goffman, W., & Harmon, G. (1971). Mathematical approach to prediction of scientific discovery. Nature, 229(5280), 103–104.
Gutiérrez-Vela, M. M., Díaz-Haro, A., Berbel-Salvador, S., Lucero-Sánchez, A., Robinson-García, N., & Cutando-Soriano, A. (2012). Bibliometric analysis of research on regenerative periodontal surgery during the last 30 years. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 4(2), 112–118.
Hagedoorn, J., Links, A., & Vonortas, N. (2000). Research partnership. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567–586.
Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2005). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–14.
Haustein, S., Costas, R., Larivière, V., & Glanzel, W. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495.
Jeffrey, P. (2003). Observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 33(4), 539–562.
Jeong, S. Choi, J. Y, Kim, J. (2014). On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of information communication, motivation and research resources. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 520–531.
Jones, B., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 5905, 1259–1262.
Kamalski, J. (2009). Small countries lead international collaboration. Research Trends, 14, 1–3.
Khor, K., & Yu, L. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1–16.
Kundra, R., & Kretschmer, H. (1999). A new model of scientific collaboration part 2. Collaboration patterns in Indian Medicine. Scientometrics, 46(3), 519–528.
Kurtz, M., & Bollen, J. (2012). Usage bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 1–64.
Kwiek, M. (2014). Internationalization and research productivity: “Internationalists” and “locals” in polish universities. HERB Academic Profession: Challenges of Transformation Higher Education in Russia and Beyond Issue 2 Fall 2014, pp. 13–15.
Lasthiotakis, H., Sigurdson, K., & Sa, C. (2013). Pursuing scientific excellence globally: Internationalising research as a policy target. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(6), 612–625.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
Lerner, J. (2012). Collaboration in intellectual property: An overview. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.
Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). The ownership of academic patents and their impact. Revue Economique, Presses de Sciences Po, 66(1) 95–123.
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Document understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101–126.
Mamolejo-Leyva, R., Perez-Angon, M., & Russell, J. (2015). Mobility and international collaboration: Case of the mexican scientific diaspora. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–16.
Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 29–31.
Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.
Mo, G. (2016). Examining cross-disciplinary impact on multidisciplinary collaborations: Implications for innovations. Information Communication and Society, 19(5), 673–690.
Murakami, Y. (2013). Influences of return migration on international collaborative research networks: Cases of Japanese scientists returning from the U.S. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 616–634.
Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multidomestically authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 313–323.
National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Ordonez-Matamoros, G. (2008). International research collaboration, research team performance, and scientific and technological capabilities in Colombia: A bottom-up perspective. Atlanta, Georgia: George State University.
Peo, F., Lorence, D., Jameson, R., Chin, J., & Gonzales, L. (2009). Issues and challenges in managing genetic intellectual property across complex collaborative networks: A proposed model for managers. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management , 3(2), 169–192.
Piwowar, H. (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159.
Research Council UK. (2013). RCUK international funding. Swindon: Research Council UK.
Ronda-Pupo, G., & Katz, S. (2016). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and international collaboration of Cuban articles in natural sciences. Scientometics, 107(3), 1423–1434.
Royal Society. 2011. Knowledge, networks and nations. Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st century. London, UK.
Santamaria, L., & Surroca, J. (2011). Matching the goals and impacts of R&D collaboration. European Management Review, 8(2), 95–109.
SAS Institute Inc. (n.d.). Cary, NC.
Scellato, G., Franzoni, C., & Stephan, P. (2012). Mobile scientists and international networks. NBER Working Paper, pp. 1–33.
Schmidt, M. (2016). Cumulative average growth rate CAGR and other growth metrics. Retrieved from Business Encyclopedia. https://www.business-case-analysis.com/growth-metrics.html
Smeby, J., & Trondal, J. (2005). Globalisation or Europeanization? International contact among university staff. Higher Education, 49(4), 449–466.
Snaith, B. (2012). Collaboration in radiography: A bibliometric analysis. Radiography, 18(4), 270–274.
Stevens, J. (2001). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwaj, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849–1857.
Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tahmooresnejad, L., Beaudy, C., & Schiffaueraova, A. (2015). The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to United States. Scientometrics, 102(1), 753–787.
Tejada, G., Hercog, M., Kuptsch, C., & Bolay, J.-C. (2014). The link with a home country: A Comparative analysis of host country environments for diaspora engagement. In S. Sahoo & B. K. Pattanaik (Eds.), Global diasporas and development: Socio-economic, cultural and policy perspectives (pp. 39–68). New Delhi: Springer India.
Traore, N., & Landry, R. (1997). On the determinants of scientists’ collaboration. Science Communication, 19(2), 124–140.
van den Besselaar, P., Inzelt, A., Reale, E., de Turckheim, E., & Vercesi, V. (2012). Indicators of internationalization for research institutions: A new approach. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
van Geenhuizen, M. (2016). The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: A bibliometric approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 61–70.
van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics: Monitoring and assessing of national R&D systems. In H. Moed, W. Glanzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 384–388). Berlin: Springer.
Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(2), 185–208.
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 1–19.
Wuchty, S., & Jones, B. U. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.
Yang, C. C., & Tang, X. (2012). A content and social network approach of bibliometrics analysis across domains. Paper presented at the ACM international conference proceeding series, pp. 515–517.
Zare-Farashbandi, F., Geraei, E., & Siamaki, S. (2014). Study of co-authorship network of papers in the journal of research in medical sciences using social network analysis. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(1), 41–46.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to collaborators at Colorado State University (Dr. James Cooney, Dr. Alan Rudolph and Doug Leavell); Michigan State University (Dr. Steve Hanson and Dr. John Whims); Kansas State University (Dr. Mary Lou Marino and Dr. Marcellus Caldus); and University of North Texas-Denton (Dr. Richard Nader, Dr. Thomas McCoy, Amanda White and Jaya Vaidyanathan) for their support in study design and data collection at their respective institutions. The authors also thank data providers from the five universities.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Award Number NCSE-1324474 “International Research Evaluation Metrics”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Payumo, J., Sutton, T., Brown, D. et al. Input–output analysis of international research collaborations: a case study of five U.S. universities. Scientometrics 111, 1657–1671 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2313-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2313-2