Citation algorithms for identifying research milestones driving biomedical innovation
- 655 Downloads
Scientific activity plays a major role in innovation for biomedicine and healthcare. For instance, fundamental research on disease pathologies and mechanisms can generate potential targets for drug therapy. This co-evolution is punctuated by papers which provide new perspectives and open new domains. Despite the relationship between scientific discovery and biomedical advancement, identifying these research milestones that truly impact biomedical innovation can be difficult and is largely based solely on the opinions of subject matter experts. Here, we consider whether a new class of citation algorithms that identify seminal scientific works in a field, Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) and multi-RPYS, can identify the connections between innovation (e.g., therapeutic treatments) and the foundational research underlying them. Specifically, we assess whether the results of these analytic techniques converge with expert opinions on research milestones driving biomedical innovation in the treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma. Our results show that these algorithms successfully identify the majority of milestone papers detailed by experts (Wong and Dlugosz in J Investig Dermatol 134(e1):E18–E22, 2014)—thereby validating the power of these algorithms to converge on independent opinions of seminal scientific works derived by subject matter experts. These advances offer an opportunity to identify scientific activities enabling innovation in biomedicine.
KeywordsReference Publication Year Spectroscopy Citation analysis Algorithmic historiography Bibliometrics
- Comins, J. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016b). Identification of long-term concept-symbols among citations: Can documents be clustered in terms of common intellectual histories? (pp. 1–20) arXiv:1601.00288.
- de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515. http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.php/methods.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
- Elango, B., Bornmann, L., & Kannan, G. (2016). Detecting the historical roots of tribology research: A bibliometric analysis. arXiv:1601.00141.
- Garfield, E., Malin, M. V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. K. Merton, A. Thackray, & H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators (pp. 179–207). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
- Kostoff, R., & Shlesinger, M. (2005). CAB: Citation-assisted background. Scientometrics, 62, 199–212. http://www.akademiai.com/index/R56K1LR0H3605886.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
- Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Milojević, S. (2014). Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST. Journal of Informetrics, 1901, 1–34. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157713001077. Accessed 23 Sept 2014.
- Radicchi, F., Fortuno, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272. http://www.pnas.org/content/105/45/17268.short. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
- Swanson, D. R. (1990). Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 78, 29–37.Google Scholar
- Van Raan, A. (2000). On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics, 47, 347–362. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-014-1465-6. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
- Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar