, Volume 110, Issue 2, pp 1081–1084 | Cite as

Authors and their citations: a point of view



This letter describes how a large number of citations for particular publications are pleasing but how a low number is not, especially when the author thinks that some of the latter publications are just as, if not more, important than the former. If an author looks up his/her citations in Google Scholar, he or she may be in for a shock. One might assume that one would be pleased with the recognition given to some of them as shown by the high number of citations, and disappointed by the lack of recognition given to others. Well, in my case, it is worse than that! I looked up the fate (in terms of the number of citations) of over 500 or so books and articles that I have published since 1964. Happily some of these have been highly cited. But, to my surprise, some pieces that I felt had made major contributions were hardly cited at all.


Designing Instructional Huge Number High Citation Initial Specification Obscure Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beard, R., & Hartley, J. (1964). Teaching and learning in higher education (4th ed.). London: Chapman.Google Scholar
  2. Burnhill, P., Hartley, J., & Davies, L. (1978). Lined paper, legibility and creativity. Educational Research, 14(1), 62. (Extended version with illustrations in J. Hartley (Ed.) (1980). The psychology of written communication (pp. 82–91). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  3. Hartley, J. (1978). Designing instructional text (3rd edn, 1994). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  4. Hartley, J. (1981). Eighty ways of improving instructional text. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-24(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hartley, J. (2000). Legal ease and ‘legalese’. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartley, J. (2005a). Is academic writing masculine? Higher Education Review, 37(2), 53–62.Google Scholar
  7. Hartley, J. (2005b). Is this chapter any use? Methods for evaluating text. In J. R. Wilson & N. Corlett (Eds.), Evaluation of human work (3rd ed., pp. 335–356). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartley, J. (2008a). Learning and studying. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hartley, J. (2008b). Academic writing and publishing. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hartley, J. (2008c). Are student voices genuine? Higher Education Review, 40(2), 63–69.Google Scholar
  11. Hartley, J., & Betts, L. (2009). Publishing before the thesis: 58 postgraduate views. Higher Education Review, 41(3), 29–44.Google Scholar
  12. Hartley, J., & Branthwaite, A. J. (1976). All this for 2%: The contribution of course-work assessment to the final grade. Durham Research Review, 37, 14–20.Google Scholar
  13. Hartley, J., & Cameron, A. (1967). Some observations of the efficiency of lecturing. Educational Review, 20(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1976). Pre-instructional strategies: The role of pre-tests, behavioral objectives, overviews and advance-organisers. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note-taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(3), 207–223.Google Scholar
  16. Hartley, J., & Johnson, M. (2000). Portrait or landscape: Typographical layouts for information leaflets. Visible Language, 34(3), 296–309.Google Scholar
  17. Hartley, J., & Jory, S. (2000). Lifting the veil on the viva: The experiences of psychology PhD candidates in the UK. Psychology Teaching Review, 9(2), 76–90.Google Scholar
  18. Hartley, J., & Lapping, C. (1992). Do mature students of psychology perform as well as traditional-entry ones? An analysis of archival data. Psychology Teaching Review, 1, 76–81.Google Scholar
  19. Lewison, G., & Hartley, J. (2005). What’s in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics, 63(2), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trueman, M., & Hartley, J. (1996). A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry students. Higher Education, 32, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyKeele UniversityStaffordshireUK

Personalised recommendations