, Volume 110, Issue 2, pp 695–709 | Cite as

Change in the publishing regime in Latin America: from a local to universal journal, Archivos de investigación Médica/Archives of Medical Research (1970–2014)

  • Francisco Collazo-Reyes
  • Maria Elena Luna-Morales
  • Evelia Luna-Morales


This study addresses an early case of an association between a local journal and a commercial publisher in Latin America striving to improve quality. The two journals examined are Archivos de Investigación Médica (AIM), 1970–1991 and its continuation as Archives of Medical Research (AMR), 1992–2014. The aim is to characterize and compare the publishing policies and patterns of scientific communication and bibliometric indicators developed under the two different types of publication: AIM as a source of local dissemination and the commercially circulated AMR. Publishing policies, production, and citations were identified in accordance with coverage by the Web of Science and Scopus indexes. The papers and citations were grouped into three categories according to the author´s affiliation: local, regional, and external. This categorization resulted in different combinations of correlations between cited and citing papers, in addition to a distribution of collaborative production and citations by country organized by continent. The comparison of results reveals two successful publishing projects; however, editorial practices pose an irreconcilable situation between the AIM objectives as a regional journal and AMR objectives as a mainstream journal, according with dominant indicators of international competition. Some implications of this situation are discussed in the context of Latin American and Caribbean journals.


Latin American journals Internationalization Publishing policies Communication practices Citation practices 



We appreciate the referee’s comments that led to an improved version of our manuscript.


  1. Alperin, J. P. (2014). South America: Citation databases omit local journals. Nature, 511(7508), 155. doi: 10.1038/511155c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alperin, J. P., Fischman, G. E. (2015). Hecho en Latinoamérica: Acceso abierto, revistas académicas e innovaciones regionales. J. P. Alperín & G. Fischman (Eds.) (1a ed., p. 117). Buenos Aires: FLACSO: LatindexGoogle Scholar
  3. Alperin, J. P., Fischman, G. E., & Willinsky, J. (2011). Scholarly communication strategies in Latin America’s research-intensive universities. Revista Educación Superior Y Sociedad, 2(16). Available in: (January 2016).
  4. Aman, V. (2015). Local, networked or external? Inclusion of regional journals in WoS and its effect. In F. Pehar, C. Schlögl, & C. Wolff (Eds.), Re: inventing information science in the networked society. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science (ISI 2015), Zadar, Croatia, 19th, 21st May 2015 (pp. 359–369). Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
  5. Appenzeller, T. (1995). Points of light in Latin America. Science, 267, 807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babini, D., Archuby, G., Carrizo, V., García, D. A., Higa, S. (2014). Open Access Indicators in Subject Digital Repositories. The Case of CLACSO´s Latin America and the Caribbean Social Sciences Digital Repository Indicators. In J. P. Alperin, D. Babini, & G. E. Fischman (Eds.) Open Access Indicators and Scholarly Communications in Latin America (1a ed., pp. 143–159). Buenos Aires: FLACSO: CLACSO: LatindexGoogle Scholar
  7. Babini, D., & Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D. (2015). Latin American science is meant to be open access: Initiatives and current challenges. Information Development, 31(5), 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beigel, F. (2014). Publishing from the periphery: structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s Conicet. Current Sociology, 62(5), 743–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benítez-Bribiesca, L. (1999a). Consilience1 in medicine. Archives of Medical Research, 30, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benítez-Bribiesca, L. (1999b). Why be a reviewer? Archives of Medical Research, 30(5), 343–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benítez-Bribiesca, L., Graham-Clark, C., & Meza, I. (2006). Foreword. Archives of Medical Research and the Seminars on Amebiasis, Archives of Medical Research, 37, 201–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2004). Towards a single language in science? A Spanish view. Serials, 17(2), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bredan, A., Benamer, H. T. S., & Bakoush, O. (2014). Why are journals from less-developed countries to low impact factor? Lybian Journal of Medicine, 9, 25774.Google Scholar
  14. Carmona-Sandoval, J. C. (2013). Discurso y artículo científico: Una aproximación retórica. Raximhai, 9(1), 117–152.Google Scholar
  15. Cetto, A. M., & Alonso-Gamboa, J. O. (1998). Scientific periodicals in Latin America and the Caribbean: A global perspective. Interciencia, 23(525), 84–93. Available in:\_02/cetto.pdf (January 2016).
  16. Cetto, A. M., & Alonso-Gamboa, J. O. (2011). Calidad e Impacto de la revista Iberoamericana. México: UNAM, Facultad de Ciencias. Available in: (January 2016)
  17. Cohen, J. (1995a). The amebiasis organism: A jekyll-and-hyde parasite? Science, 267, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. (1995b). A stubborn amoeba takes center stage. Science, 267, 822–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin American and the Caribbean: The effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collazo-Reyes, F., Flores-Vargas, X., Muñoz-García, M. L., & Pérez-Angón, M. A. (2014). Las prácticas de citación como interpretantes semióticos de acreditación de saberes locales en astronomía: México 1952-1972. Transinformacao, 26(3), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collazo-Reyes, F., Luna-Morales, M. E., Russell, J. M., & Perez-Angon, M. A. (2008). Publication and citation patterns of Latin American and Caribbean journals in the SCI and SSCI from 1995 to 2004. Scientometrics, 75(1), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citation in Scientific Communication (p. 103p). London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  23. Cronin, B. (2000). Semiotic and evaluative bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis, P. M. (2009). Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation. Learned Publishing, 22(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaillard, J. (1989). La science du tiers monde est-elle visible? La Recherche, 20, 636–640.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the third world. Scientific American, 273, 76–83.Google Scholar
  27. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kosland, D. E. (1995). Science in Latin America. Science, 267, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science metrics more scientific. Nature, 464, 488–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leon-S., M. E., Contreras, V. A., Leon-Sarmiento, F. E. (2007). El impacto del factor de impacto: ¿mito o realidad? Colombia Médica. Available in: (January 8 2016)
  31. Lucio-Arias, D., Vélez-Cuartas, G., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). SciELO citation index and web of science: Distinctions in the visibility of regional science. Available in: (January 2016).
  32. Luna-Morales, M. E., & Collazo-Reyes, F. (2007). Análisis histórico bibliométrico de las revistas latinoamericanas y caribeñas en los índices de la ciencia internacional 1961–2005. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 30, 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1987). Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Facts and artifacts. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez-Palomo, A. (2003). Las amibas, enemigos invisibles (p. 101). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. La ciencia para todos/47.Google Scholar
  35. Martínez-Palomo, A., Gómez-Dantés, O., López-Cervantes, M., & Castro, V. (1995). Investigación en salud en México: Un esbozo de agenda. Salud Pública México, 39 (5). México, D.F.: Academia Nacional de Medicina, Comisión Mexicana de Investigación en SaludGoogle Scholar
  36. Meneghini, R., Mugnaini, R., & Packer, A. L. (2006). International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI Databases. Scientometrics, 69(3), 529–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meneghini, R., Packer, A. L., & Nassi-Calò, L. (2008). Articles by Latin American authors in prestigious journals have fewer citations. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miguel, S., González, C., & Chichilla-Rodríguez, Z. (2015). Lo local y lo global en la producción científica argentina con visibilidad en Scopus, 2018–2012. Dimensiones nacionales e internacionales de la investigación. Información, Cultura y Sociedad, 32, 59–77.Google Scholar
  39. Moed, H. F. (2005). What do references and citations measure? In H. F. Moed (Ed.), Citation analysis research evaluation. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Mugnaini, R., Digiampetri, L. A., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2014). Scientific communication in Brazil (1998–2012): Indexing, growth, flow and dispersion. Transinformação, 26(3), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nwagwu, W. E. (2010). Cybernation the academe: Centralized scholarly ranking and visibility of scholars in the developing world. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul, D. (2000). In citing chaos: A study of the rhetorical use of citations. Journal of Bussines Technology Communication, 4(2), 185–216.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pérez-Tamayo, R. (2005). Historia general de la ciencia en México en el siglo XX. Mexico: FCE. Colección obras de ciencia y tecnología.Google Scholar
  44. Restrepo-Forero, O. (2004). Retórica de la ciencia sin retórica: sobre autores, comunidades y contextos. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 23, 251–268.Google Scholar
  45. Reyes, A. (1959). A vuelta de correo/Obras completas de Alfonso Reyes. VIII (pp. 427–449). México: FCE.Google Scholar
  46. Sepúlveda, B. (1982). Amibiasis. En: Guillermo Alfaro y Ruy Pérez Tamayo (Coods.). La Investigación biomédica en México: pasado, presente y futuro (p. 265). México: CONACYT. ISBN: 9688231126, 9789688231128Google Scholar
  47. Stauffer, W., & Ravdin, J. I. (2003). Enamoeba histolytica: An update. Current Opinion in Infectious, 16, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stavenhagen, R. (1965). Siete Tesis equivocadas sobre América Latina. En: México como problema. Esbozo de una historia intelectual/Carlos Illades y Rodolfo Suárez (Coords.) (pp. 327–342). México: Siglo XXI; Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.Google Scholar
  49. Testa, J. (2009). Regional content expansion in web of science: Opening borders to exploration. Global Highered. Available in: 2016).
  50. Testa, J. (2011). The globalization of web of science 2005–2010. Available in: (January 2016).
  51. Vessuri, H., Guédon, J. C, Cetto, A. M. (2013). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin American and its implications for development. Current Sociology, 62(5), 647–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. White, H. D. (2004). Reward persuasión and the Sokal hoax: A study in citation identities. Scientometrics, 60(1), 93–120.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zaitzeff, S. I. (1996). La polémica de 1932: Alfonso Reyes y a vuelta de correo. Universidad de México (vol. 548, pp. 11–15). Available in: (January 2016).

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Collazo-Reyes
    • 1
  • Maria Elena Luna-Morales
    • 2
  • Evelia Luna-Morales
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaCinvestav - IPNMexico cityMexico
  2. 2.Unidad de Indicadores Bibliométricos, Servicios BibliográficosCinvestav - IPNMexico cityMexico

Personalised recommendations