Scientometrics

, Volume 110, Issue 2, pp 1035–1051 | Cite as

International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact

Article

Abstract

The present study sought to examine the trend and impact of international collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam during the period after the introduction of the a reform policy and the normalization of relations with the United States. Using the Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science data (2001–2015) we found that 77% of Vietnam’s scientific output (n = 18,044 papers) involved international collaborations, with the United States and Japan researchers being the most frequent partners. The proportion of international collaborations has decreased slightly over time at the expense of an increased rate of domestic collaborations. The rate of growth in Vietnam’s scientific output was 17% per annum, and three-quarters of the growth was associated with international collaborations rather than purely domestic production. Moreover, internationally coauthored papers received twice the average citation as domestic papers. Of note, papers with overseas corresponding author had higher citation rate than papers with domestic corresponding author. These data suggest that the vast majority of scientific papers from Vietnam was attributable to international collaboration, and this had a positive impact on the quality and visibility of Vietnam science. The data also indicate that Vietnam is in the growth phase of building up research capacity.

Keywords

Vietnam Developing country Country effects Bibliometrics International collaboration Citation rate Journal impact factor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Professor Tuan V. Nguyen’s work is supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. We thank Professor Robert M. Graham of the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (Australia) for his personal interest of this work and his thoughtful comments that improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Ahn, C. Y. (1991). Technology transfer and economic development: The case of Korea. In K. Minden (Ed.), Pacific cooperation in science and technology. Honolulu: East West Center(I).Google Scholar
  2. Akre, O., Barone-Adesi, F., Pettersson, A., Pearce, N., Merletti, F., & Richiardi, L. (2011). Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(2), 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonelli, C., & Fassio, C. (2015). Academic knowledge and economic growth: are scientific fields all alike? Socio-Economic Review. doi:10.1093/ser/mwv025.Google Scholar
  4. Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation, 24, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Academy of Science. (2016). The importance of advanced physical, mathematical and biological sciences to the Australian economy. Australian Academy of Science: Acton.Google Scholar
  6. Baumann, P., Belanger, R. E., Akre, C., & Suris, J. C. (2011). Increased risks of early sexual initiators: time makes a difference. Sex Health, 8(3), 431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceci, S. J., & Peters, D. P. (1982). Peer review–a study of reliability. Change, 14(6), 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, K., Yao, Q., Sun, J., He, Z. F., Yao, L., & Liu, Z. Y. (2016). International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 5, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Moya-Anegón, F., & Herrero-Solana, V. (1999). Science in America Latina: a comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators. Scientometrics, 46, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gantman, E. R. (2012). Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific productivity of countries. Scientometrics, 93, 967–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glanzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51, 69–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2012). The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application. Scientometrics, 95, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science-industry interaction: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30, 791–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khor, K. A., & Yu, L. G. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, 107, 1095–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, M. J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 63, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles. BioScience, 55(5), 438–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lou, W., & He, J. (2015). Does author affiliation reputation affect uncitedness? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Low, W. Y., Ng, K. H., Kabir, M. A., Koh, A. P., & Sinnasamy, J. (2014). Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics, 98, 1521–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mahian, O. (2015). Corresponding authors: Is there fame bias in editorial choice? Nature, 519(7544), 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manh, H. D. (2015). Scientific publications in Vietnam as seen from Scopus during 1996–2013. Scientometrics, 105, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen, T. V., & Pham, L. T. (2011). Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: An analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 89, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: a new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, M. J., Weinberger, C., Bruna, E. M., & Allesina, S. (2014). The scientific impact of nations: journal placement and citation performance. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  28. Tijssen, R. J. W., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2003). Bibliometric analyses of world science. In Third european report on S&T indicators. European Communities.Google Scholar
  29. Venets, V. I. (2014). Some problems associated with affiliation of the authors in the web of science. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 59, 681–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wagner, C. S., Branmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., & Yoda, T. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries (RAND, 2001). World Bank Report MR-1357.0-WB.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94, 851–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Witze, A. (2016). Research gets increasingly international. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19198.Google Scholar
  33. World Bank. (2014). Science Technology and Innovation in Vietnam. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  34. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2004). S&T networks and bibliometrics: The case of international scientific collaboration. In 4th Proximity Congress: Proximity, Networks and Co-ordination, Marseille (France) (p. 15), June 17, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Health TechnologiesUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Garvan Institute of Medical ResearchSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Informetrics Research GroupTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  4. 4.Ha Tinh UniversityHa TinhVietnam

Personalised recommendations