, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 1979–1987 | Cite as

Does the average JIF percentile make a difference?

  • Liping Yu
  • Houqiang Yu


Average journal impact factor (JIF) percentile is a novel bibliometric indicator introduced by Thomson Reuters. It’s of great significance to study the characteristics of its data distribution and relationship with other bibliometric indicators, in order to assess its usefulness as a new bibliometric indicator. The research began by analyzing the meaning of average JIF percentile, and compared its statistical difference with impact factor. Based upon factor analysis, the paper used multivariate regression and quantile regression to study the relationship between average JIF percentile and other bibliometric indicators. Results showed that average JIF percentile had changed the statistical characteristic of impact factor, e.g. improved the relative value of impact factor, having smaller variation coefficient and distribution closer to normal distribution. Because it’s non-parametric transformation, it cannot be used to measure the relative gap between journals; Average JIF percentile had the highest regression coefficient with journal impact, followed by timeliness and lastly the citable items; The lower the average JIF percentile, the higher the elastic coefficient of journal impact; When average JIF percentile was extremely high or extremely low, citable items were not correlated with the average JIF percentile at all; When average JIF percentile was low, elastic coefficient of timeliness was even higher; Average JIF percentile was not a proper indicator for multivariate journal evaluation; Average JIF percentile had both the advantages and disadvantages of impact factor, and thus had the same limitation in applying as the impact factor.


Average JIF percentile Impact factor Quantile regression 



This research was supported by China Scholarship Council (No. 201506270024) and the National Natural Science Fund of China (NSFC) (No. 71303179). The authors would thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.


  1. Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2009). Citation statistics. Statistical Science, 24(1), 1–26.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornmann, L. (2013). The problem of percentile rank scores used with small reference sets. JASIST, 64(3), 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Mutz, R. (2013). The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2011). Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 228–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects. Journal of information Science, 10(4), 173–180.Google Scholar
  6. Campanario, J. M. (2014). Analysis of the distribution of cited journals according to their positions in the h-core of citing journal listed in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hintze, J. L., & Nelson, R. D. (1998). Violin plots: A box plot-density trace synergism. The American Statistician, 52(2), 181–184.Google Scholar
  8. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10 % (or top-25 %?) of the most-highly cited papers. Scientometrics, 92(2), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2133–2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rousseau, R. (2012). Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomson Reuters. JCR Reports. (2016). Accessed 19 Mar 2016.
  12. Vinkler, P. (2008). Introducing the current contribution index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals. Scientometrics, 79(2), 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou, P., & Zhong, Y. (2012). The citation-based indicator and combined impact indicator—new options for measuring impact. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 631–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International business schoolYunan University of finance and economicsKunmingChina
  2. 2.School of Information ManagementWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations