Scientometrics

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 2067–2076 | Cite as

Evolving landscape of low-energy nuclear physics publications

Article

Abstract

Evolution of low-energy nuclear physics publications over the last 120 years has been analyzed using nuclear physics databases. An extensive study of Nuclear Science References, Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EXFOR), and Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) contents provides a unique picture of refereed and non-refereed nuclear physics references. Significant fractional contributions of non-refereed reports, private communications and conference proceedings in EXFOR and ENSDF databases in the 1970’s reflect extensive experimental campaigns and an insufficient number of research journals. This trend has been reversed in recent years because the number of measurements is much lower, while number of journals is higher. In addition, nuclear physics results are mainly published in a limited number of journals, such as Physical Review C and Nuclear Physics A. In the present work, historic publication trends and averages have been extracted and analyzed using nuclear data mining techniques. The results of this study and implications are discussed and conclusions presented.

Keywords

Nuclear science trends Publication analysis Nuclear data mining Relational databases 

Mathematical Subject Classification

01-02 58Z05 

JEL Classification

C810 C920 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC) network members and Dr. V. Unferth (Viterbo University) for productive discussions and careful reading of the manuscript and useful suggestions, respectively. This work was funded by the Office of Nuclear Physics, Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC.

References

  1. Becquerel, M. H. (1896). Sur les radiations emises par phosphorescence. C.R. Physique, 122, 420.Google Scholar
  2. Burrows, T. W. (1990). The evaluated nuclear structure data file: Philosophy. Content, and Use, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, 286, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chadwick, J. (1932). Possible existence of a neutron. Nature (London), 129, 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hahn, O., & Strassmann, F. (1939). Uber den Nachweis und das Verhalten der bei der Bestrahlung des Urans mittels Neutronen entstehenden Erdalkalimetalle. Naturwissenschaften, 27, 11.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Holden, N. (2005). “A short history of CSISRS: At the cutting edge of nuclear data in formation storage and retrieval systems and its relationship to CINDA, EXFOR and ENDF (2005),” Unpublished. Accessed 4 March 2016. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/exfor/compilations/CSISRSHistory.pdf.
  6. Otuka, N., Dupont, E., Semkova, V., et al. (2014). Towards a more complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR): international collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC). Nuclear Data Sheets, 120, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pritychenko, B. (2015). Intriguing trends in nuclear physics authorship. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pritychenko, B., Betak, E., Kellett, M. A., et al. (2011). The nuclear science references (NSR) database and web retrieval system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, 640, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rontgen, W. C. (1896). On a new kind of rays. Nature (London), 53, 274.Google Scholar
  10. SCImago Journal rank (2016). Available from http://www.scimagojr.com/. Accessed 10 May 2016.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryNational Nuclear Data CenterUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations