Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 2093–2117 | Cite as

The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system

  • Giovanni Abramo
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
  • Francesco Rosati
Article

Abstract

This work examines whether the macroeconomic divide between northern and southern Italy is also present at the level of higher education. The analysis confirms that the research performance in the sciences of the professors in the south is on average less than that of the professors in the north, and that this gap does not show noticeable variations at the level of gender or academic rank. For the universities, the gap is still greater. The study analyzes some possible determinants of the gap, and provides some policy recommendations for its reduction.

Keywords

Research evaluation Bibliometrics Universities FSS 

References

  1. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011a). The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems. Scientometrics, 87(3), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012a). The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012b). Revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity. Higher Education, 63(6), 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012c). Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2013a). Individual research performance: A proposal for comparing apples to oranges. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015a). Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender? Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015a). Accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities. Current Science, 109(10), 1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015b). The VQR, Italy’s second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2202–2214.Google Scholar
  10. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2016a). A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(3), 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2016b). A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators: Rejoinder. Journal of Informetrics, 10(3), 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2014a). Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2069–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2014b). Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities. Higher Education, 68(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2011b). The role of information asymmetry in the market for university-industry research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2013b). The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2013c). Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: The importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline. Scientometrics, 97(3), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2014c). Career advancement and scientific performance in universities. Scientometrics, 98(2), 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2014d). Relatives in the same university faculty: Nepotism or merit? Scientometrics, 101(1), 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2015b). The determinants of academic career advancement: Evidence from Italy. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 761–774.Google Scholar
  20. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2016). A methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). National research assessment exercises: A measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform. Scientometrics, 84(3), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Aiello, F., & Scoppa, V. (2000). Uneven regional development in Italy: explaining differences in productivity levels. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 270–298.Google Scholar
  23. Aiello, F., & Scoppa, V. (2006). Convergence and regional productivity divide in Italy: Evidence from panel data. In Proceedings of XXVII Italian regional science association conference, Pisa.Google Scholar
  24. Allesina, S. (2011). Measuring nepotism through shared last names: The case of Italian academia. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e21160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index RCI 2013, Report EUR 26060.Google Scholar
  26. Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. J. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ANVUR. (2014). Rapporto sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca 2013. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.anvur.org/attachments/article/644/Rapporto%20ANVUR%202013_UNIVERSITA%20e%20RICERCA_integrale.pdf.
  28. ANVUR. (2016). Rapporto biennale sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca 2016. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.anvur.org/attachments/article/1045/ANVUR_Rapporto_INTEGRALE_~.pdf.
  29. Aprile, P. (2010). Terroni. Tutto quello che è stato fatto perché gli italiani del Sud diventassero meridionali. Milan: Edizioni Piemme.Google Scholar
  30. Autant-Bernard, C. (2001). Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case. Research Policy, 30(7), 1069–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Baccini, A. (2016). Napoleon and the bibliometric evaluation of research: Considerations on university reform and the action of the national evaluation agency in italy. [Napoléon et l’évaluation bibliométrique de la recherche: Considérations sur la réforme de l’universitéet sur l’action de l’agence nationale d’évaluation en Italie]. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 40(1), 37–57.Google Scholar
  32. Baccini, A., & de Nicolao, G. (2016). Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1–21.Google Scholar
  33. Balconi, M., & Laboranti, A. (2006). University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35, 1616–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Banfi, A., & Viesti, G. (2015). “Meriti” e “bisogni” nel finanziamento del sistema universitario italiano, Working papers RES 03/2015.Google Scholar
  35. Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Beraldo, S. (2010). Do differences in IQ predict Italian north–south differences in income? A methodological critique to Lynn. Intelligence, 38(5), 456–461.Google Scholar
  37. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2005). Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity. Scientometrics, 63(1), 87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cafagna, L. (1989). La questione delle origini del dualismo economico Italiano. In L. Cafagna (Ed.), Dualismo e sviluppo nella storia d’Italia (pp. 187–220). Marsilio: Venezia.Google Scholar
  39. Cannari, L., Magnani, M., & Pellegrini, G. (2010). Critica della regione meridionale. Il Sud e le politiche pubbliche. Editori Laterza: Bari.Google Scholar
  40. Cappelletti Montano, B. (2015). Punti organico: in 4 anni il Nord si è preso 700 ricercatori dal Centro-Sud. ROARS, 18/08/2015. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at: http://www.roars.it/online/?p=45227.
  41. Carl, N. (2014). Does intelligence explain the association between generalized trust and economic development? Intelligence, 47(6), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Cornoldi, C., Belacchi, C., Giofrè, D., Martini, A., & Tressoldi, P. (2010). The mean Southern Italian children IQ is not particularly low: A reply to R. Lynn (2010). Intelligence, 38(5), 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. D’Angelo, C. A., Giuffrida, C., & Abramo, G. (2011). A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Daniele, V. (2015). Two Italies? Genes, intelligence and the Italian north–south economic divide. Intelligence, 49(2), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Daniele, V., & Malanima, P. (2007). Il prodotto delle regioni e il divario Nord-Sud in Italia (1861–2004). Rivista di politica economica, 97(2), 267–316.Google Scholar
  46. Daniele, V., & Malanima, P. (2011). Il divario Nord-Sud in Italia, 1861–2011. Soveria Mannelli (Italy): Rubbettino Editore.Google Scholar
  47. Daniele, V., & Malanima, P. (2014). Perché il Sud è rimasto indietro? Il Mezzogiorno fra storia e pubblicistica. Rivista di storia economica, 30(1), 3–36.Google Scholar
  48. Durante, R., Labartino, G. & Perotti, R. (2011). Academic dynasties: Decentralization and familism in the Italian academia, NBER working paper no. 17572. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  49. Eckaus, R. S. (1960). L’esistenza di differenze economiche tra Nord e Sud d’Italia al tempo dell’unificazione. Moneta e Credito, 51, 347–372.Google Scholar
  50. Eckaus, R. S. (1961). The Nord–South differential in Italian economic development. The Journal of Economic History, 21(03), 285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Eckaus, R. S. (1969). Il divario Nord-Sud nei primi decenni dell’Unità. In A. Caracciolo (Ed.), La formazione dell’Italia industriale (pp. 223–243). Laterza: Bari (Italy).Google Scholar
  52. Esposto, A. G. (1992). Italian industrialization and the Gerschenkronian “great spurt”: A regional analysis. The Journal of Economic History, 52(02), 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Esposto, A. G. (1997). Estimating regional per capita income: Italy, 1861–1914. Journal of European Economic History, 26(3), 585–604.Google Scholar
  54. Felice, E. (2014). Perché il Sud è rimasto indietro. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  55. Felice, E., & Giugliano, F. (2011). Myth and reality: A response to Lynn on the determinants of Italy’s north–south imbalances. Intelligence, 39(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fox, M. F. (1983). Pubblication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Francalacci, P. (2015). Punti organico: chi ha avuto e chi ha dato. ROARS, 05/10/2015. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.roars.it/online/?p=46127.
  58. Franco, G. (2013). The scientific sector MED44 facing the task of assessing the quality of research (2004–2010) of the ANVUR (national agency of assessing university research): Lights and shadows]. [Il settore scientifico-disciplinare MED44 di fronte all’esercizio di valutazione della qualità della ricerca (VQR 2004-2010) dell’ANVUR: luci e ombre. La Medicina Del Lavoro, 104(6), 483–485.Google Scholar
  59. Golden, J., & Carstensen, F. V. (1992). Academic research productivity, department size and organization: Further results, comment. Economics of Education Review, 11(2), 169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ISTAT. (2015a). Conti economici territoriali. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/148152.
  61. ISTAT. (2015b). Spesa per ricerca e sviluppo per regione. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://noi-Italy.istat.it/fileadmin/user_upload/allegati/S14I01M02p0_2014_02.xls.
  62. ISTAT. (2015c). Rapporto Bes 2015: il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.istat.it/it/files/2015/12/Rapporto_BES_2015.pdf.
  63. Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.Google Scholar
  64. Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Long, J. S. (1992). Measure of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lynn, R. (2010). In Italy, north–south differences in IQ predict differences in income, education, infant mortality, stature, and literacy. Intelligence, 38(1), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lynn, R. (2012). IQs in Italy are higher in the north: A reply to Felice and Giugliano. Intelligence, 40(3), 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Niceforo, A. (1901). Italiani del nord e italiani del sud (Vol. 34). Torino: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar
  70. Perotti, R. (2008). L’università truccata. Einaudi, Italy. ISBN 978-8-8061-9360-7.Google Scholar
  71. Piffer, D., & Lynn, R. (2014). New evidence for differences in fluid intelligence between north and south Italy and against school resources as an explanation for the north–south IQ differential. Intelligence, 46(5), 246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2014). ‘Turning the tables’: Regions shaping university performance. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scoppa, V. (2007). Quality of human and physical capital and technological gaps across Italian regions. Regional Studies, 41(5), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seglen, P. O., & Asknes, D. G. (2000). Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49(1), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. SVIMEZ. (2015). Rapporto SVIMEZ 2015 sull’economia del Mezzogiorno. Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.svimez.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=348&Itemid=127&lang=it.
  77. Trigilia, C. (2012). Non c’è Sud senza Nord. Perché la crescita dell’Italia si decide nel Mezzogiorno. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  78. Viesti, G. (2015). Nuovi divari. Un’indagine sulle Università del Nord e del Sud. Rapporto RES (Istituto di Ricerca Economia e Società in Sicilia). Last accessed on September 19, 2016 at http://www.resricerche.it/media/allegati/sintesi%20della%20ricerca_2015.pdf.
  79. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2004). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes (review). Social Forces, 82(4), 1669–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zagaria, C. (2007). Processo all’università. Cronache dagli atenei Italiani tra inefficienze e malcostume. ISBN 978-8-8220-5365-7, Dedalo, Italy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Abramo
    • 1
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesco Rosati
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory for Studies of Research Evaluation, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI-CNR)National Research Council of ItalyRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Engineering and ManagementUniversity of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Management EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations