Knowledge creation and dissemination by Kosetsushi in sectoral innovation systems: insights from patent data
- 520 Downloads
Public institutes for testing and research called Kosetsushi constitute an important component of regional innovation policies in Japan. They are organized as a technology diffusion program to help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) improve productivity through various technology transfer activities. Using comprehensive patent data, this study quantitatively evaluates technology transfer activities of Kosetsushi from the perspective of sectoral innovation systems. The key findings can be summarized as follows. First, local SMEs’ technological portfolios (the distribution of patents across technological fields) indicate a better fit with those of Kosetsushi than with those of local universities. This tendency is salient for manufacturing Kosetsushi. Second, Kosetsushi collaborate on research with local SMEs compared to local universities. This tendency is salient for manufacturing Kosetsushi. Third, in regions where SMEs’ innovative activities concentrate in biotechnology, Kosetsushi are likely to engage in licensing. In regions where SMEs’ innovative activities concentrate in mechanical engineering, Kosetsushi are likely to engage in technical consultation. Fourth, the successful commercialization of Kosetsushi patents relies on both understanding of technological needs of local SMEs and upgrading scientific quality of Kosetsushi researchers. Policy and research implications are discussed.
KeywordsInnovation Intermediaries Japan Patents Sectoral innovation systems SMEs Technology transfer
JEL ClassificationD83 L26 M13 O31 O32 O33
The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. The usual caveats apply. This study was conducted as a part of the research project “The Role of Public Research Institutions in the Japan’s National Innovation System” at the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). This article is based on the RIETI Discussion Paper 16-E-061. The author would like to thank project members, with a special mention to Akira Goto, Jun Suzuki, Naotoshi Tsukada, Isamu Yamauchi, and Patarapong Intarakumnerd for their collaboration. This study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K03411).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflict of interest.
- Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1992). Real effects of academic research: comment. American Economic Review, 82(1), 363–367.Google Scholar
- Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., & Soete, L. (1995). Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest industrial firms: Results of the PACE Survey on Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations, and Government Programmes. Maastricht: MERIT.Google Scholar
- Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chukumba, C., & Jensen, R. (2005). University invention, entrepreneurship, and startups. NBER Working Paper #11475.Google Scholar
- Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552.Google Scholar
- Dornbusch, F., & Brenner, T. (2013). Universities as local knowledge hubs under different technology regimes? New evidence from academic patenting. Fraunhofer ISI Working Paper R6/2013.Google Scholar
- Fukugawa, N., & Goto, A. (2016). Problem solving and intermediation by local public technology centers in regional innovation systems: The first report on a branch-level survey on technical consultation. RIETI Discussion Paper, 16-E-062.Google Scholar
- Galasso, A., & Schankerman, M. (2014). Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. IIR Working Paper No. 13-16.Google Scholar
- Goto, A., & Nagata, A. (1997). Technological opportunities and appropriating the returns from innovation: Comparison of survey results from Japan and the US. Tokyo: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy.Google Scholar
- Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.Google Scholar
- Japan Association for the Advancement of Research Cooperation. (2001). Survey on local public technology centers in regional innovation systems. Tokyo: JAREC.Google Scholar
- Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1984). Survey research on R&D appropriability and technological opportunity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce. (1886). Noshomu-sho Hokoku (Report of the Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce). Tokyo: Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce. (1912). Komu-kyoku Chosa Kogyo Ni Kansuru Shisetsu Kogai. Tokyo: Seisan Chosa Kai.Google Scholar
- Nagaoka, S., & Walsh, J. (2009). Commercialization and other uses of patents in Japan and the U.S.: Major findings from the RIETI-Georgia Tech inventor survey. RIETI Discussion Paper 09E011.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Science and Technology Policy. (2003). University–industry collaborations 1983–2002. Tokyo: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Nikkei. (2014). Patents owned by the local authorities. Nikkei Glocal, 238, 10–25.Google Scholar
- Odagiri, H. (1999). University–Industry collaboration in Japan: Facts and interpretations. In L. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge: University–industry linkages in Japan and the United States (pp. 252–265). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress. (1990). Making things better: Competing in manufacturing, OTA-ITE-443. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Putnam, J. (1996). The value of international patent rights. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
- World Intellectual Property Organization. (2016). IPC concordance table. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/xls/ipc_technology.xls. Accessed on 26 Aug 2016.
- Yoshihara, M., & Tamai, K. (1999). Lack of incentive and persistent constraints: Factors hindering technology transfer at Japanese Universities. In L. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge: University–industry linkages in Japan and the United States (pp. 348–363). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar