The effect of collaborators on institutions’ scientific impact

Abstract

The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with different degrees of impact and collaboration. Not only collaborators including both core and peripheral collaborators cite each other more than non-collaborators, but also the first group cites each other faster than the second group even when self-citations were ignored. Although high impact institutions and more collaborative institutions receive more citations from their collaborators, it seems that the number of these citations increases only up to a certain point. In this regard, for example, there is a slight difference between top and middle collaborative institutions; however, only a small fraction of collaborators do not cite back the papers of these two groups of institutions. The benefit of collaboration varies based on the type of collaborators, institutions, papers, citers and the publication year of cited documents. For example, the effect of collaboration decreases as the institutions level of impact increases. Hence, collaborating more does not directly imply obtaining higher impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/UnifyingNameVariants.pdf.

  2. 2.

    .http://incites.isiknowledge.com/common/help/h_field_category_oecd.html.

References

  1. Ahn, J., Oh, D. H., & Lee, J. D. (2014). The scientific impact and partner selection in collaborative research at Korean universities. Scientometrics, 100(1), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajiferuke, I., Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2011). Who are the research disciples of an author? Examining publication recitation and oeuvre citation exhaustivity. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrade, H. B., de Los Reyes Lopez, E., & Martín, T. B. (2009). Dimensions of scientific collaboration and its contribution to the academic research groups’ scientific quality. Research Evaluation, 18(4), 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2010). The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 444–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, H. W., & Huang, M. H. (2013). Prominent institutions in international collaboration network in astronomy and astrophysics. Scientometrics, 97(2), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: Acase study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns. Research Evaluation, 23(3), 261–271. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2015). The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis. Research Evaluation, rvv039. http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/12/31/reseval.rvv039.abstract.

  12. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators. Scientometrics, 59(3), 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Forthcoming in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

  16. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, T., Ball, B., Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Coauthorship and citation in scientific publishing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.0473.

  20. Thagard, P. (1997). Noûs, 31(2), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2010). A structural analysis of collaboration between European research institutes. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. N. (2005). Signals in science-On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics, 64(2), 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS One, 7(3), e33339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. White, H. D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, Q., & Guan, J. (2011). International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87(1), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Gazni.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Table 1 Different groups of collaborators and non-collaborators citations to the institutions most recent publications
Table 2 Different groups of collaborators and non-collaborators citations to the institutions most recent publications where none of the citing institution(s) is equal with the citing ones
Table 3 Different groups of collaborators and non-collaborators citations to the most recent publications of different groups of institutions
Table 4 Different groups of collaborators and non-collaborators citations to the most recent publications of different groups of institutions where none of the citing institution(s) is equal with the citing ones
Table 5 Different groups of collaborators and non-collaborators citations to the institutions publications in any years
Table 6 Different groups of collaborators and non-collaborators citations to the publications of different groups of institutions in any years where none of the citing institution(s) is equal with the citing ones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gazni, A., Larivière, V. & Didegah, F. The effect of collaborators on institutions’ scientific impact. Scientometrics 109, 1209–1230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2101-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Scientific collaboration
  • Collaboration strategies
  • Citation patterns
  • Inter-organization collaborations