The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with different degrees of impact and collaboration. Not only collaborators including both core and peripheral collaborators cite each other more than non-collaborators, but also the first group cites each other faster than the second group even when self-citations were ignored. Although high impact institutions and more collaborative institutions receive more citations from their collaborators, it seems that the number of these citations increases only up to a certain point. In this regard, for example, there is a slight difference between top and middle collaborative institutions; however, only a small fraction of collaborators do not cite back the papers of these two groups of institutions. The benefit of collaboration varies based on the type of collaborators, institutions, papers, citers and the publication year of cited documents. For example, the effect of collaboration decreases as the institutions level of impact increases. Hence, collaborating more does not directly imply obtaining higher impact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Ahn, J., Oh, D. H., & Lee, J. D. (2014). The scientific impact and partner selection in collaborative research at Korean universities. Scientometrics, 100(1), 173–188.
Ajiferuke, I., Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2011). Who are the research disciples of an author? Examining publication recitation and oeuvre citation exhaustivity. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 292–302.
Andrade, H. B., de Los Reyes Lopez, E., & Martín, T. B. (2009). Dimensions of scientific collaboration and its contribution to the academic research groups’ scientific quality. Research Evaluation, 18(4), 301–311.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2010). The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 444–446.
Chang, H. W., & Huang, M. H. (2013). Prominent institutions in international collaboration network in astronomy and astrophysics. Scientometrics, 97(2), 443–460.
Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861–873.
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: Acase study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.
Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns. Research Evaluation, 23(3), 261–271. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu014.
Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2015). The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis. Research Evaluation, rvv039. http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/12/31/reseval.rvv039.abstract.
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators. Scientometrics, 59(3), 281–310.
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.
Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259–1262.
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Forthcoming in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 434–442.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 171–183.
Martin, T., Ball, B., Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Coauthorship and citation in scientific publishing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.0473.
Thagard, P. (1997). Noûs, 31(2), 242–261.
Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2010). A structural analysis of collaboration between European research institutes. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 55–65.
Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. N. (2005). Signals in science-On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics, 64(2), 209–233.
Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS One, 7(3), e33339.
White, H. D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111–126.
Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 150–168.
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.
Zhao, Q., & Guan, J. (2011). International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87(1), 159–170.
About this article
Cite this article
Gazni, A., Larivière, V. & Didegah, F. The effect of collaborators on institutions’ scientific impact. Scientometrics 109, 1209–1230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2101-4
- Scientific collaboration
- Collaboration strategies
- Citation patterns
- Inter-organization collaborations