The effect of collaborators on institutions’ scientific impact
- 407 Downloads
The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with different degrees of impact and collaboration. Not only collaborators including both core and peripheral collaborators cite each other more than non-collaborators, but also the first group cites each other faster than the second group even when self-citations were ignored. Although high impact institutions and more collaborative institutions receive more citations from their collaborators, it seems that the number of these citations increases only up to a certain point. In this regard, for example, there is a slight difference between top and middle collaborative institutions; however, only a small fraction of collaborators do not cite back the papers of these two groups of institutions. The benefit of collaboration varies based on the type of collaborators, institutions, papers, citers and the publication year of cited documents. For example, the effect of collaboration decreases as the institutions level of impact increases. Hence, collaborating more does not directly imply obtaining higher impact.
KeywordsScientific collaboration Collaboration strategies Citation patterns Inter-organization collaborations
- Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2015). The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis. Research Evaluation, rvv039. http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/12/31/reseval.rvv039.abstract.
- Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Forthcoming in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.Google Scholar
- Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 171–183.Google Scholar
- Martin, T., Ball, B., Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Coauthorship and citation in scientific publishing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.0473.
- Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar