Scientometrics

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 2195–2216 | Cite as

How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system

Article

Abstract

The present paper examines the relationships between the major research organizations in Germany. Special focus is given to the three research fields natural sciences, engineering and technology, and medical and health sciences for the publication period 2007–2012. The results not only provide understanding of collaboration ties, but also of preference structures with regard to referencing and citation behavior and the citation impact of co-authored publications. The mean normalized citation rate and the PP(top 10 %) indicator show that inter-organizational co-authorship just as international co-authorship is rewarded with higher citation impact as opposed to intra-organizational publications.

Keywords

Research collaboration German science system Citation analysis Citation preference 

References

  1. BMBF. (2008). Strengthening Germany’s role in the global knowledge society: Strategy of the Federal Government for the Internationalization of Science and Research. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF): Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Internationalisierungsstrategie-English.pdf
  2. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis: Structural analysis in the social sciences (Vol. 27). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Destatis. (2015). Bildung und Kultur. Studierende an Hochschulen -Vorbericht. Wintersemester 2014/2015. Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/BildungForschungKultur/Hochschulen/StudierendeHochschulenVorb2110410158004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  4. European Commission. (2015). Directorate-general for internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and SMEs, “Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015”, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Federal_Report_on_Research_and_Innovation_2014.pdf
  5. Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Scienc, 9(4), 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garfield, E. (1998). The use of journal impact factors and citation analysis for evaluation of science. In 41st annual meeting of the council of biology editors, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 4 May 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377. doi:10.1023/A:1014254214337 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214. doi:10.1023/A:1010561321723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators. Scientometrics, 59(3), 281–310. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018535.99885.e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K, Jr. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337. doi:10.1023/A:1025048516769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GWK. (2016). Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz: Pakt für Forschung und Innovation; Monitoring-Bericht 2016; Materialien der GWK, Heft, 47, Bonn 2016. Retrieved from http://www.gwk-bonn.de/fileadmin/Papers/GWK-Heft-47-PFI-Monitoring-Bericht-2016.pdf
  12. Hinze, S. (2016). Forschungsförderung und ihre Finanzierung. In D. Simon, A. Knie, S. Hornbostel, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik. Wiesbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05677-3_15-1.Google Scholar
  13. Hornbostel, S., & Möller, T. (2015) Die Exzellenzinitiative und das deutsche Wissenschaftssystem, eine bibliometrische Analyse, Band 12/2015 der Schriftenreihe „Wissenschaftspolitik im Dialog“der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36. doi:10.1007/BF02016282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mund, C., Conchi, S., & Frietsch, R. (2015). 4. Indikatorbericht Bibliometrische Indikatoren für den PFI Monitoring Bericht 2015. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/files/4_Indikatorbericht_Bibliometrische_Indikatoren_fuer_den_PFI-Monitoring_Bericht_2015.pdf
  19. Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31, 1389–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD. (2015). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015: Innovation for growth and society. Paris: OECD. 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Posner, R. A. (1999). The theory and practice of citations analysis, with special reference to law and economics. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 83, 1–34. Retrieved from http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1577&context=law_and_economics
  23. Puuska, H. M., Muhonen, R., & Leino, Y. (2014). International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different OECD fields. Scientometrics, 98(2), 823–839. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rammer, C., et al. (2016). Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft - Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2015. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH. 2016.Google Scholar
  25. Rehn, C., & Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet, Version 1.05. Solna: Karolinska Institutet University Library.Google Scholar
  26. Schmoch, U., Gruber, S., & Frietsch, R. (2016) 5. Indikatorenbericht, Bibliometrische Indikatoren für den PFI Monitoring Bericht 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/files/5.%20Indikatorbericht_PFI_Monitoring_Bericht_2016-03-25.pdf
  27. Schmoch, U., Mallig, N., Michels, C., Neuhäusler, P., & Schulze, N. (2011). Performance and Structures of the German Science System in an International Comparison 2010 with a Special Analaysis of Public Non-university Research Institutions. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem. Retrieved from http://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Studien/StuDIS_2011/StuDIS_8_2011.pdf
  28. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1818-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2006). Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, 69(2), 409–428. Retrieved from 10.1007/s11192-006-0160-7
  30. Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2009). Strength and weakness of national science systems: A bibliometric analysis through cooperation patterns. Scientometrics, 79(2), 389–408. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0426-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428. doi:10.1007/BF02458380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waltman, L., & Schreiber, M. (2013). On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 372–379. doi:10.1002/asi.22775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Scientometrics, 96, 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 87(3), 467–481. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0354-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851–872. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Winterhager, M., Schwechheimer, H., & Rimmert, C. (2014). Institutionenkodierung als Grundlage für bibliometrische Indikatoren. Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/view/209

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DZHW – German Centre for Higher Education and Research StudiesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations