Scientometrics

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 227–239 | Cite as

Comparison of environmental laws publications in Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Index: a bibliometric analysis

Article

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of environmental law research in the natural science and social science fields from a bibliometric perspective. Document type, publication language, annual output, and distributions of countries were quantitatively characterized and compared in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) and the Social Science Index (SSCI). The citation history of highly cited articles and word analysis were used to examine research tendencies and “hotspots” in environmental law research. The results show that from 1992 to 2014 SCI-EXPANDED has published more research in environmental laws than SSCI except in 2011. The USA is the most productive country in both databases. Developing countries such as China, India, and Brazil are among the top 10 productive countries in SCI-EXPANDED, while in that of SSCI, China is the only developing country. The USA had the most frequent collaborations with other countries both in SCI-EXPANDED and SSCI; collaborations were more frequent in SSCI than in the SCI-EXPANDED. Words analysis reveals that “sustainability”, “compliance”, and “environmental management” are key issues in SSCI, while articles in SCI-EXPANDED pay more attention to “risk assessment”, “recycling”, “wastewater treatment”, and “temperature”. “China” is a key issue in research in both natural science and social science field, which indicates the rapid development of environmental law research in China as well as the growing concerns of China’s environmental law issues.

Keywords

Environmental law Scientometrics SCI-EXPANDED SSCI 

Supplementary material

11192_2016_2010_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biber, E. (2012). Which science? Whose science? How scientific disciplines can shape environmental law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 79, 471–552.Google Scholar
  3. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cano, V., & Lind, N. C. (1991). Citation life cycles of ten citation classics. Scientometrics, 22(2), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuang, K. Y., & Ho, Y. S. (2015). An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan. Current Science, 108(5), 933–941.Google Scholar
  7. Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the Essential Science Indicators database of the Institute for Scientific Information. Scientometrics, 87(3), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness. The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Da Silva, F. M., de Lacerda, P. S. B., & Jones, J. (2005). Sustainable development and Green Chemistry. Quimíca Nova, 28(1), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y., & Shi, L. (2014). Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Du, M., Wang, B., & Wu, Y. (2014). Sources of China’s economic growth: An empirical analysis based on the BML index with green growth accounting. Sustainability, 6(9), 5983–6004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falagas, M. E., Karavasiou, A. I., & Bliziotis, I. A. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of global trends of research productivity in tropical medicine. Acta Tropica, 99(2), 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the Science Citation Index (Expanded). Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 379(1), 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Mapping of drinking water research: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992–2011. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garfield, E. (1990). KeyWords Plus: ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. Part 1. Expanding your searching power on Current Contents on Diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, H. B., & Henrikson, J. H. (1997). How well does journal impact work in the assessment of papers onclinical physiology and nuclear medicine? Clinical Physiology, 17(4), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, Y. S. (2012). Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 20(3), 478–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho, Y. S. (2013). The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1297–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho, Y. S. (2014). Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho, Y. S., & Kahn, M. (2014). A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index Expanded™. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ho, Y. S., Satoh, H., & Lin, S. Y. (2010). Japanese lung cancer research trends and performance in Science Citation Index. Internal Medicine, 49(20), 2219–2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jang, J. C., & Sheen, J. (1994). Sugar sensing in higher plants. Plant Cell, 6(11), 1665–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kashiwagi, T., Du, F. M., Douglas, J. F., Winey, K. I., Harris, R. H., & Shields, J. R. (2005). Nanoparticle networks reduce the flammability of polymer nanocomposites. Nature Materials, 4(12), 928–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khanna, M., & Damon, L. A. (1999). EPA’s voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(1), 1–25.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein, S., & Hage, J. J. (2006). Measurement, calculation, and normal range of the ankle-arm index: A bibliometric analysis and recommendation for standardization. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 20(2), 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lang, Q., & Wai, C. M. (2001). Supercritical fluid extraction in herbal and natural product studies—A practical review. Talanta, 53(4), 771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 75(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, J. F., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Trends in research on global climate change: A Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis. Global and Planetary Change, 77(1–2), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma, J. P., Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). The top-cited wetland articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: Characteristics and hotspots. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(3), 1039–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mao, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric study of the trend in articles related to risk assessment published in Science Citation Index. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 16(4), 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mela, G. S., & Cimmino, M. A. (1998). An overview of rheumatological research in the European Union. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 57(11), 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mu, Z., Bu, S., & Xue, B. (2014). Environmental legislation in China: Achievements, challenges and trends. Sustainability, 6(12), 8967–8979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oyama, S. T. (2003). Novel catalysts for advanced hydroprocessing: Transition metal phosphides. Journal of Catalysis, 216(1–2), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ren, S., Yuan, B., Ma, X., & Chen, X. (2014). The impact of international trade on China’s industrial carbon emissions since its entry into WTO. Energy Policy, 69, 624–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Revesz, R. L. (1992). Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the “race-to-the-bottom” rationale for federal environmental regulation. New York University Law Review, 67(6), 1210–1254.Google Scholar
  39. Ryan, S. P. (2012). The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. Econometrica, 80(3), 1019–1061.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanislaus, A., Marafi, A., & Rana, M. S. (2010). Recent advances in the science and technology of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) production. Catalysis Today, 153(1), 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stern, R. E. (2014). The political logic of China’s new environmental courts. China Journal, 72, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sun, J. S., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on estuary pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vergidis, P. I., Karavasiou, A. I., Paraschakis, K., Bliziotis, I. A., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 24(5), 342–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vescovi, E. G., Soncini, F. C., & Groisman, E. A. (1996). Mg2+ as an extracellular signal: Environmental regulation of Salmonella virulence. Cell, 84(1), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vlachy, J. (1985). Scientometric analyses in physics a bibliography of publication, citation and mobility studies. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 35(12), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, M. H., Li, J. F., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Research articles published in water resources journals: A bibliometric analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 28(1–3), 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, H., Liu, M., Hong, S., & Zhuang, Y. (2013). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of GPS research from 1991–2010. Scientometrics, 95(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wohlin, C. (2005). Most cited journal articles in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 47(15), 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xie, S. D., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, G. F., Xie, S. D., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics, 83(2), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhu, S., He, C., & Liu, Y. (2014). Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms’ strategies in China’s pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum, 55, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Trend Research CentreAsia UniversityWufengTaiwan

Personalised recommendations