, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 959–975 | Cite as

Academy of Management Journal, 1958–2014: a citation analysis

  • Angelito Calma
  • Martin Davies


This paper provides a citation network analysis of publications from the Academy of Management Journal, one of the key US-based journals in the field of Management. Our analysis covers all publications in the journal from 1958–2014. This represents the entire history of the journal until the arbitrary cut-off point of our study. The paper analyses the most published authors, most cited articles, most cited authors, top institutions, and the nationalities of authors that are most represented in the journal. 2304 articles containing 114,550 references were taken from the primary data source, the Web of Science™. An analysis of 114,550 citations was carried out using the Web of Science™ online analytics tool and Excel®. Gephi™, a data visualisation and manipulation software, was used to provide a visual representation of the citation networks. Results indicate that the most published authors within AMJ throughout the journal’s history are Ivancevich, Golembiewski and Hambrick. The three most cited authors within AMJ are Pfeffer, Porter and Thompson. The single most cited article is Pfeffer and Salancik’s 1978 article The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. A keyword analysis revealed that the most important terms used in the journal’s history were ‘Performance’, ‘Organization’ and ‘Work’. Results from this paper extend our previous citation analyses of key journals in the discipline of Higher Education to a new discipline—the field of Management. The paper provides evidence of how visual analyses can help to represent the citation “geography” of a journal over time.


Citation analysis Bibliometric analysis Academy of Management Journal Network analysis Gephi™ 


  1. Academy of Management. (2015). Academy of management journal: Welcome to AMJ. Retrieved 8 June 2015 from
  2. Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Liu, Y., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2014). What makes articles highly cited? The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 152–179. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2012). Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME Journal: Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology, 6(2), 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calma, A., & Davies, M. (2015a). Geographies of influence: A citation network analysis of higher education 1972–2014 (under review). Journal of Scientometric Research.Google Scholar
  5. Calma, A., & Davies, M. (2015b). Studies in higher education 1976–2013: A retrospective using citation network analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatha, K. A., Butt, I., & Tariq, A. (2015). Research methodologies and publication trends in manufacturing strategy. International Journal Of Operations and Production Management, 35(4), 487–546. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-07-2012-0285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferreira, M. P., Santos, J. C., De Almeida, M. R., & Reis, N. R. (2014). Mergers and acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010. Journal of Business Research, 12, 2550. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P., & Pyka, A. (2014). Simulating knowledge dynamics in innovations networks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Haddad, K., Singh, G., Sciglimpaglia, D., & Chan, H. (2014). To what extent do articles published in other than “top journals” have impact on marketing? European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 271–287. doi: 10.1108/EJM-11-2010-0592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hudson, C. M., & Conant, G. C. (2011). Expression level, cellular compartment and metabolic network position all influence the average selective constraint on mammalian enzymes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11(1), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaimal, V., Bardes, E. E., Tabar, S. C., Jegga, A. G., & Aronow, B. J. (2010). ToppCluster: A multiple gene list feature analyzer for comparative enrichment clustering and network-based dissection of biological systems. Nucleic Acids Research, 38, W96–W102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu, L. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2014). The knowledge diffusion paths of corporate social responsibility—From 1970 to 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(2), 113–128. doi: 10.1002/csr.1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montes, C. P., Seoane, M. J. F., & Laxe, F. G. (2012). General cargo and containership emergent routes: A complex networks description. Transport Policy, 24, 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rossano, A. J., Chouhan, A. K., & Macleod, G. T. (2013). Genetically encoded pH-indicators reveal activity-dependent cytosolic acidification of Drosophila motor nerve termini in vivo. Journal of Physiology London, 591(7), 1691–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schruijer, S. G., & Curseu, P. L. (2014). Looking at the gap between social psychological and psychodynamic perspectives on group dynamics historically. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(2), 232–245. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-08-2012-0121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schulz, A., & Nicolai, A. T. (2015). The intellectual link between management research and popularization media: A bibliometric analysis of the harvard business review. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(1), 31–49. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Viguerie, N., Montastier, E., Maoret, J.-J., Roussel, B., Combes, M., Valle, C., et al. (2012). Determinants of human adipose tissue gene expression: impact of diet, sex, metabolic status, and cis genetic regulation. PLoS Genetics, 8(9), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Williams Centre for Learning Advancement, Faculty of Business and EconomicsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations