Skip to main content

Academic research in innovation: a country analysis

Abstract

Many countries are investing a lot in innovation in order to modernize their economies. A key step in this process is the development of academic research in innovation. This article analyzes the leading countries in innovation research between 1989 and 2013 from an academic perspective. The aim of the study is to identify the most relevant countries in this field and the leading trends that are occurring during the last years. The work also introduces a general perspective analyzing the research developed in several supranational regions. The main advantage of this contribution is that it gives a global overview of the current academic state of the art in the area. The analysis focuses on the most productive and influential countries in innovation research classifying the results in periods of 5 years. The leading journals in the field are also studied individually identifying the most productive countries in each of the journals. The results show that the publications of each country are biased by the country origin of the journal. The USA and the UK are the leading countries in this field being the UK the most productive one in per capita terms among the big countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  • Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). H-index: A review focused on its variants, computation, and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, G., Gambardella, A., Jappelli, T., Nappi, C. A., & Peracchi, F. (2015). Bibliometric evaluation vs informed peer review: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 44, 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the Journal of Product Innovation Management: History, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2010). In search of the classics: A study of the impact of JPIM papers from 1984 to 2003. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 461–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla, C., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105, 1239–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancino, C., Merigó, J. M., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of innovation research. CID Working Papers, 2015-01. Chile: University of Chile.

  • Cheng, C. H., Kumar, A., Motwani, J. G., Reisman, A., & Madan, M. S. (1999). A citation analysis of the technology innovation management journals. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: The effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confraria, H., & Godinho, M. M. (2015). The impact of African science: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102, 1241–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupé, T. (2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 1309–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (2014). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: A bibliometric study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & Marra, M. (2014). Ordered weighted averaging operators 1988–2014. A citation based literature survey. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29, 994–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1132–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38, 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102, 1139–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., & Li, J. (2015). A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics, 102, 1521–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamourzov, R. (2012). The development trends of science in the CIS countries on the basis of some scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 91, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Aström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1154–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. D. (2004). Perspective: Ranking business schools on the management of technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. D., & Embrechts, M. (2007). MOT TIM journal rankings 2006. Technovation, 27, 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2004). Perspective: Ranking the technology innovation management journals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41, 1219–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20, 236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2015a). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015b). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2645–2653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2016). Accounting research: A bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review. doi:10.1111/auar.12109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino, M. T. G., do Carmo, M. L. P., & Alvarez, M. V. S. (2006). 25 years of Technovation: Characterization and evolution of the journal. Technovation, 26, 1303–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panat, R. (2014). On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China. Scientometrics, 100, 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box: Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34, 62–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, J. (2007). Perspective: The world’s top innovation management scholars and their social capital. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 214–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thongpapanl, N. T. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation, 32, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71, 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, H. (2014). The shift from theory to innovation: The evolution of Brazilian research frontiers 2005–2011. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovation systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88, 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waast, R., & Rossi, P. L. (2010). Scientific production in Arab countries: A bibliometric perspective. Science Technology & Society, 15, 339–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, P., & Tao, L. (2012). Perspective: Ranking of the world’s top innovation management scholars and universities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, W. D., Kim, S. H., Park, H. W., & Kang, J. W. (2015). A bibliometric method for measuring the degree of technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., & Shi, S. (2015). Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: Using a citation network analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 32, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America’s scientific output in public health through SCImago journal & country Rank. BMC Public Health, 14, 632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kirvaitis, R., & Dagiene, E. (2011). Scientific publications released in the Baltic States. Scientometrics, 88, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., Hassan, S. U., Mirza, H. T., & Xie, Q. (2014). Measuring recent research performance for Chinese universities using bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 101, 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Merigó.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2175 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merigó, J.M., Cancino, C., Coronado, F. et al. Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics 108, 559–593 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Bibliometrics
  • Country analysis
  • Web of Science
  • VOS viewer