What makes a ‘good’ title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science
- 1.5k Downloads
What makes a “good” title for an article, i.e. one which might attract citations in the academic community? Answers to this question are manifold, though inconclusive across disciplines. In an attempt to provide cohesion, we integrate significant title characteristics from previous studies across disciplines into a comprehensive model and link it with citation count. Keeping the application context constant, we focus on management science and find that only non-alpha numeric characters and a balanced title structure have small, but significant effects on citation count. Surprisingly, attributes which tended to show significant effects in other disciplines (though often in opposite directions), such as length, context, and linguistic attributes exhibited no relationship with citation count.
KeywordsArticle title Citation count Scholarly impact Title attributes Management
The authors would like to thank Dr. Matthias Weiss (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), and Mr. Simon Pek (Simon Fraser University) for their helpful comments. We would also like to thank both anonymous reviewers, as well as the Scientometrics editor Wolfgang Glaenzel for the excellent—challenging, yet always constructive feedback which they generously provided.
- Hartley, J. (2007a). Colonic titles. Journal of the European Medical Writers Association, 16(4), 147–149.Google Scholar
- Siggelkow, N. (2001). Who reads my paper anyways? A survey of the journal readership and reputation. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Swales, J., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar