Abstract
Comparative benchmarking with bibliometric indicators can be an aid in decision-making with regard to research management. This study aims to characterize scientific performance in a domain (Public Health) by the institutions of a country (Cuba), taking as reference world output and regional output (other Latin American centers) during the period 2003–2012. A new approach is used here to assess to what extent the leadership of a specific institution can change its citation impact. Cuba was found to have a high level of specialization and scientific leadership that does not match the low international visibility of Cuban institutions. This leading output appears mainly in non-collaborative papers, in national journals; publication in English is very scarce and the rate of international collaboration is very low. The Instituto de Medicina Tropical Pedro Kouri stands out, alone, as a national reference. Meanwhile, at the regional level, Latin American institutions deserving mention for their high autonomy in normalized citation would include Universidad de Buenos Aires (ARG), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BRA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (ARG), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (BRA) and the Centro de Pesquisas Rene Rachou (BRA). We identify a crucial aspect that can give rise to misinterpretations of data: a high share of leadership cannot be considered positive for institutions when it is mainly associated with a high proportion of non-collaborative papers and a very low level of performance. Because leadership might be questionable in some cases, we propose future studies to ensure a better interpretation of findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The EPHF includes a methodology that allows countries to evaluate their public health capacity through a collective survey. Each indicator has a standard model and a series of measurements that describes in detail the capacities necessary for optimal performance of the function, in terms of structure, processes, and specific outcomes associated with performance. The specific indicators of the EPHF 10 are: development of public health research plans; development of the institutional capacity for research and advisory services and technical support for research at the sub-national public health entities.
References
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. (2013). National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: The Italian case. Scientometrics, 95(1), 311–324.
Aguillo, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85, 243–256.
Arencibia Jorge, R., Carrillo Calvet, H., Corera Álvarez, E., Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z., & de Moya Anegón, F. (2013a). La investigación científica en las universidades cubanas y su caracterización a partir del ranking de instituciones de SCImago. Revista Universidad de La Habana, 276, 163–192.
Arencibia Jorge, R., Corera Álvarez, E., Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z., & de Moya Anegón, F. (2013b). Intersectoral relationships, scientific output and national policies for research development: A case study on Cuba 2003–2007. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 24(3), 243–254.
Arencibia-Jorge, R., Vega-Almeida, R., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Patrones de especialización de la investigación cubana en salud. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 38(supl. 5), 734–747.
Barros, A. J. D. (2006). Scientific output in the collective health area: Journal profile and evaluation by Capes. Revista de Saúde Pública, 40(spe), 43–49.
Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45, 199–245.
Bornmann, L. (2013). The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 722–729.
Bornmann, L., de Moya Anegón, F., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants? A bibliometric investigation of the Ortega hypothesis. PLoS One, 5(10), e13327.
Bornmann, L., de Moya Anegón, F., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The new excellence indicator in the world report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 333–335.
Bornmann, L., & Moya Anegón, F. (2014). What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 732–736.
Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2011). Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages infield-normalization. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 228–230.
Bornmann, L., Stefaner, M., Moya Anegón, F., & Mutz, R. (2014a). Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers. A visualisation of results from multi-level models. Online Information Review, 38(1), 43–58.
Bornmann, L., Stefaner, M., Moya Anegón, F., & Mutz, R. (2014b). What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 581–593.
Calero-Medina, C., López-Illesca, C., Visser, M. S., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Important factors when interpreting bibliometric rankings of world universities: An example in the field of oncology. Research Evaluation, 17(1), 71–81.
Cañedo Andalia, R., Rodríguez Labrada, R., Dorta Contreras, A. J., & Velázquez Pérez, L. (2014). Producción científica en salud de Cuba registrada en PubMed en el periodo 2010–2012. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 25(2), 157–171.
Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). (2014). Leiden ranking. www.leidenranking.com. Accessed 25 July 2014.
CHE Centre for Higher Education. (2014). U-Multirank. www.u-multirank.eu. Accessed 25 July 2014.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Moya-Anegón, F., & Corera-Álvarez, E. (2015a). Some patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: The current situation and challenges. Scientometrics, 103(3), 779–794.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Miguel, S., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2015b). What factors are affecting the visibility of Argentinean publications in human and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidences beyond the geographic realm of the research. Scientometrics, 102(1), 789–810.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Zacca-González, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2015c). Latinoamerican scientific output in Public Health: Combined analysis of bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators. Scientometrics, 102(1), 609–628.
Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública (ENSAP). (2015). www.ensap.sld.cu. Accessed 7 August 2015.
Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48, 121–150.
Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schubert, A., & Debackere, K. (2009). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78(1), 165–188.
Guerrero, V. P., Olmeda-Gomez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 392–404.
Hazelkorn, E. (2013). How rankings are reshaping higher education. In V. Climent, F. Michavila, & M. Ripolles (Eds.), Los rankings univeritarios: Mitos y realidades. Madrid: Ed. Tecnos.
Hendrix, D. (2008). An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997–2007. Journal of Medical Library Association, 96(4), 324–334.
Huang, M. H. (2012). Exploring the h-index at the institutional level. A practical application in world university rankings. Online Information Review, 36(4), 534–547.
Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., & Chen, D. Z. (2006). Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419–435.
Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. (2013). Academic ranking of world universities (ARWU). http://www.shanghairanking.com. Accessed 25 July 2014.
Leta, J., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2013). A macro-level study of science in Brazil: Seven years later. Encontros Biblio: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informaçao, 18(36), 51–66.
Ministerio de Salud Pública. (2013). Anuario Estadístico de Salud. La Habana: Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas.
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Moed, H. F., Moya-Anegón, F., López-Illescas, C., & Visser, M. (2011). Is concentration of university research associated with better research performance? Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 649–658.
Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Bustos-González, A., Corera-Álvarez, E., López-Illescas, C., & Vargas-Quesada, B. (2014). Principales indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Bornmann, L., & Moed, H. F. (2013). The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: A promising new approach. Scientometrics, 97, 421–434.
Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). (2002). Public health in the Americas: Conceptual renewal, performance assessment, and bases for action. Washington, DC: PAHO/WHO.
Rehn, C., Kronman, U., & Wadskog, D. (2007). Bibliometric indicators: Definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet version 1.0. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet University Library.
Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2012). Counting highly cited papers for university research assessment: Conceptual and technical Issues. PLoS One, 7(10), e47210.
Sarduy Domínguez, Y., Llanusa Ruiz, S. B., Urra González, P., & Antelo Cordovés, J. M. (2014). Caracterización de la producción científica de la Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública referenciada en la base de datos Scopus, 2006–2012. Educación Médica Superior, 28(2). http://www.ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/201.
SCImago Institutions Rankings. (2014). http://www.scimagoir.com. Accessed 4 August 2014.
Sipahi, H., Durusoy, R., Ergin, I., Hassoy, H., Davas, A., & Karababa, A. O. (2012). Publication rates of public health theses in international and national peer-review journals in Turkey. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 41(9), 31–35.
Vega Almeida, R. L., Arencibia Jorge, R., & Araújo Ruiz, J. A. (2007). Producción científica de los institutos de salud de Cuba en el Web of Science en el periodo 2000–2004. Acimed, 16(3). http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/aci/vol16_3_07/aci03907.htm.
Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. (2010). A research impact indicator for institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 581–590.
Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131816. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131816.
Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2015). Patrones de comunicación e impacto de la producción científica cubana en Salud Pública. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 41(2), 200–216.
Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014a). Bibliometric analysis of Latin America’s regional scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal and Country Rank. BMC Public Health, 14 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/632 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-632), 632.
Zacca-González, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014b). Producción científica cubana en Medicina y Salud Pública. Scopus 2003–2011. Transinformação, 26(3), 281–293.
Acknowledgments
This work was made possible through financing by the scholarship funds for international mobility between Andalusian and IberoAmerican Universities and the SCImago Group. The authors appreciate the comments of the reviewers, which served to improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript, as well as the support in translating/editing of the manuscript by Jean Sanders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Zacca-González, G., Vargas-Quesada, B. et al. Benchmarking scientific performance by decomposing leadership of Cuban and Latin American institutions in Public Health. Scientometrics 106, 1239–1264 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1831-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1831-z