Abstract
The paper discusses the trend of world literature on “International Business” in terms of the output of research publications as indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index during the period from 2004 to 2013. A total of 3131 journals and 1623 papers were indexed on international business in the database during the 10 year study period. The average number of papers published per year was 162.30. The highest numbers of papers, i.e., 268 (16.513 %) were published in the year 2010. The author Eden L and Causgil ST have shared the top position who wrote the highest publications, i.e., 13 (0.801 %) each. The source title Journal of International Business Studies contained the highest number with 359 (22.12 %) publications. The most popular research area is Business Economics in which the highest number of publications, i.e., 1442 (88.848 %) counted. The United States contributed highest number of publications, i.e., 616 (37.954 %) among the total of 62 counties who contributed on the subject. Most productive institution was University of Leeds, which contributed a total of 28 (1.1164 %) publications among the total of 513 organizations. Articles amounted to 1329 (81.885 %) of the literature on international business. The study will help researchers and authors who can identify the most appropriate, influential journals in which to publish, as well as confirm the status of journals in which they have published (Hasan et al. in Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the digital libraries, 27–29 November 2013 New Delhi, India. TERI, New Delhi, pp 319–329, 2013). It will help professors, academicians and students who can discover where to find the current reading list in their respective fields (Krishna and Kumar in SRELS J Inf Manag 41(2):229–234, 2004). The publishers and editors can determine journals’ influence in the marketplace and review editorial functions (Chuang et al. in Scientometrics 87(3):551–562, 2011). The educational institutions, business groups, to look into the trends and make appropriate policies related to international business on the basis of inferences depicted from the analysis. The administrators, policy and planning makers can track bibliometric and citation patterns to make strategic and funding decisions (Arora et al. in Curr Sci 104(3):307–315, 2013). The librarians and information analysts can support selection or removal of journals from their collections, and determine how long to keep each journal in the collection before archiving it (Trivedi in Libr Philos Pract, 1–6, 2010).
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AI:
-
Article Influence
- ABDC:
-
Australian Business Deans Council
- ABS:
-
Association of Business Schools
- BCI:
-
Book Citation Index
- CSCD:
-
Chinese Science Citation Database
- CR:
-
Cited References
- EF:
-
Egienfactor
- FA:
-
First Author
- IF:
-
Impact Factor
- ISI:
-
Institute for Scientific Information
- JCR:
-
Journals Citations Index
- NR:
-
Cited Reference Count
- SJR:
-
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
- TC:
-
Times Cited Count (WoS—Core collection)
- TP:
-
Total Publications
- WoS:
-
Web of Science
- Z9:
-
Total Times Cited Count (WoS, BCI, and CSCD)
References
Arora, J., Trivedi, K. J., & Kembhavi, A. A. (2013). Impact of access to e-resources through the UGC-INFONET Digital Library Consortium on research output of member universities. Current Science, 104(3), 307–315.
Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 227–243.
Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information. Scientometrics, 87(3), 551–562.
Garfield, E., & Sher I. H. (1963 & 1998). Letters to the Editor, The Multiple Meanings of Impact Factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(8), 768. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/multiple_meanings_impfactor.html#garfieldsher_1963. Accessed 30 March 2014.
Gupta, B. M., & Kaur, Har. (2013). World glaucoma research: a quantitative analysis of research output during 2002–2011. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 60, 98–106.
Hasan, N., & Singh, M. (2013). Digital library literature: A scientometric analysis. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the digital libraries, 27–29 November 2013 New Delhi, India: 319–329. New Delhi: TERI
Judge, T. A., et al. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited—article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491–506.
Kademani, B. S., et al. (1994). Scientometric portrait of Noble Laureate Dr. C. V. Raman. Indian Journal of Information Library and Society, 37(4), 215–249.
Kademani, B. S., et al. (2006). Scientometric dimensions of nuclear science and technology research in India: A study based on INIS (1970–2002) database. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 11(1), 23–48.
Krishna, K. M., & Kumar, S. (2004). Authorship trends in agriculture research: A bibliometric analysis. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 41(2), 229–234.
Mahesh, G., & Wadhwa, N. K. (2013). Web of science based ranking of Indian library and information science journals. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management. http://www.tarupublications.com/journals/cjsim/FullText/new%20pdf/05_CJSIM6-2.pdf. Accessed on 31 March 2014.
Pillai, K. G. S. (2007). Journal citation in physics doctoral dissertations of Indian Institute of Science. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54(4), 177–184.
Trivedi, M. (2010). Digital libraries: Functionality, usability and accessibility. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–6. http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/trivedi-diglib.htm. Accessed 31 March 2014.
Funding
No funding sources for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhardwaj, R.K. Scientometric analysis and dimensions on international business literature. Scientometrics 106, 299–317 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1777-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1777-1