Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 105, Issue 1, pp 97–114 | Cite as

Scientometric mapping of computer science research in Mexico

  • Ashraf Uddin
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
  • David Pinto
  • Ivan Olmos
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed scientometric and text-based analysis of Computer Science (CS) research output from Mexico during 1989–2014, indexed in Web of Science. The analytical characterization focuses on origins and growth patterns of CS research in Mexico. In addition to computing the standard scientometric indicators of TP, TC, ACPP, HiCP, H-index, ICP patterns etc., the major publication sources selected by Mexican computer scientists and the major funding agencies for CS research are also identified. The text-based analysis, on the other hand, focused on identifying major research themes pursued by Mexican computer scientists and their trends. Mexico, ranking 35th in the world CS research output during the mentioned period, is also unique in the sense that 75 % of the total CS publications are produced by top ten Mexican institutions alone. Similarly, Mexico has higher ICP instances than world average. The analysis presents a detailed characterization on these aspects.

Keywords

Mapping Mexico Research competitiveness Scientometrics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by research Grants from Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (Grant INT/MEXICO/P-13/2012) and CONACYT Project#165158.

References

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: A field level analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeza-Yates, R. A., Fuller, D. A., Pino, J. A., & Goodman, S. E. (1995). Computing in Chile: The jaguar of the Pacific Rim? Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya, S., & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics, 93(1), 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cisneros, G. (1991). La Computación en México y la influencia de HV McIntosh en su desarrollo. Computer Science in Mexico and the Influence of HV McIntosh on its Development], Reunión Nacional de Matemáticos en Homenaje al Dr. José Adem, ‘‘Medio Siglo de Matemáticas en México: Estado Actual y Perspectivas.Google Scholar
  5. Costa, B. M. G., Pedro, E. S., & Macedo, G. R. (2013). Scientific collaboration in biotechnology: The case of the northeast region in Brazil. Scientometrics, 95(2), 571–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding, Z. Q., Ge, J. P., Wu, X. M., & Zheng, X. N. (2013). Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries. Scientometrics, 96(3), 829–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finerman, A. (1969). Computing capabilities at Argentine and Chilean universities. Communications of the ACM, 12(8), 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Independent research of China in science citation index expanded during 1980–2011. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. González, M., & Martínez, A. C. (2000). Historia de la computación en México: una industria en desarrollo. Mexico: Hobbiton Ediciones.Google Scholar
  10. Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999–2008. Scientometrics, 86(2), 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guzman, A., & McIntosh, H. V. (1966). Convert. Communications of the ACM, 9(8), 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Babu, B. R., & Natarajan, M. (2012). Scientometric analysis of stem cell research: a comparative study of India and other countries. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 6(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kostoff, Ronald N. (2008). Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 64(2), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., & von Ins, M. (2008). Scientific output and impact: Relative positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemaître, C. (1988). La computación en la UNAM en el período de 1968–1980: Una interpretación. Pasado, Presente y Futuro de la Computación, 30, 358–369.Google Scholar
  17. Lomnitz, L. A., & Cházaro, L. (1999). Basic, applied and technological research: Computer science and applied mathematics at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma, R., Ni, C., & Qiu, J. (2008). Scientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science. Scientometrics, 76(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87(2), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ozel, B. (2012). Collaboration structure and knowledge diffusion in Turkish management academia. Scientometrics, 93(1), 183–206.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pavon, R. (1958). The Mexican light and power company introduces a direct way for fast computation of industrial services with power factor adjustment. In Preprints of papers presented at the 13th national meeting of the Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 1–3). New York, NY: ACM, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Robles, J. C. G., & Rodríguez-Escobar, E. (2008). Entrevista personal con dos miembros del equipo de diseño de la IPN E-16. México: Ciudad de México. (30).Google Scholar
  23. Segovia, R., Gursharan, S., & Loyo, C. (1979). Redes de computadoras. Ciencia y Desarrollo, 26, 10–19.Google Scholar
  24. Singh, V. K., Uddin, A., & Pinto, D. (2015). Computer science research: The top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics, Springer,. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1612-8.Google Scholar
  25. Singhal, K., Banshal, S. K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). The information technology knowledge infrastructure and research in South Asia. Journal of Scientometric Research, 3(4), 134–142.Google Scholar
  26. Soriano, M., & Lemaître, C. (1985). La era digital. Ciencia y Desarrollo, 60, 133–140.Google Scholar
  27. Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2011). The growth of international collaboration in East European scholarly communities: a bibliometric analysis of journal articles published between 1989 and 2009. Scientometrics, 89(2), 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014a). Measuring research output and collaboration in South Asian countries. Current Science, 107(1), 31–38.Google Scholar
  30. Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014b). Mapping the computer science research in SAARC countries. IETE Technical Review, 31(4), 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Villasenor, Y. F. (1982). Evolution of a program in computing for a Latin American graduate college. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 14(2), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashraf Uddin
    • 1
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
    • 1
  • David Pinto
    • 2
  • Ivan Olmos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceSouth Asian UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaPueblaMexico

Personalised recommendations