Co-authorship proximity of A. M. Turing Award and John von Neumann Medal winners to the disciplinary boundaries of computer science
- 267 Downloads
It is shown that winners of the A. M. Turing Award or the John von Neumann Medal, both of which recognize achievement in computer science, are separated from some other A. M. Turing Award or John von Neumann Medal winner by at most 1.4 co-authorship steps on average, and from some cross-disciplinary broker, and hence from some discipline other than computer science, by at most 1.6 co-authorship steps on average. A. M. Turing Award and John von Neumann Medal recipients during this period are, therefore, on average closer in co-authorship terms to some other discipline that typical computer scientists are, on average, to each other.
KeywordsBiomedical sciences Computer science Cross-disciplinary brokers Erdős numbers Graph centrality Interdisciplinarity
- Corbato, F. J., & Switendick, A. C. (1963). Integrals for diatomic molecular calculations. In B. Alder, S. Fernbach, & M. Rotenberg (Eds.), Methods in computational physics (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- De Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Erdős distance and general collaboration distance. ISSI Newsletter, 1(2), 4–5.Google Scholar
- Grossman, J. (2005). Patterns of research in mathematics. Notices of the AMS, 52(1), 35–41.Google Scholar
- Lederberg, J., Sutherland, G. L., Buchanan, B. G., Feigenbaum, E. A., Robertson, A. V., Duffield, A. M., & Djerassi, C. (1969). Applications of artificial intelligence for chemical inference. I. Number of possible organic compounds. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 91, 2973–2976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sugimoto, C. & Weingart, S. (2015). The kaleidoscope of disciplinarity. Preprint (http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto/preprints/KaleidoscopeOfDisciplinarity.pdf. Accessed Jan 2015).