Skip to main content

The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 April 2015

Abstract

In this study, we compare the difference in the impact between open access (OA) and non-open access (non-OA) articles. 1761 Nature Communications articles published from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2013 are selected as our research objects, including 587 OA articles and 1174 non-OA articles. Citation data and daily updated article-level metrics data are harvested directly from the platform of nature.com. Data is analyzed from the static versus temporal-dynamic perspectives. The OA citation advantage is confirmed, and the OA advantage is also applicable when extending the comparing from citation to article views and social media attention. More important, we find that OA papers not only have the great advantage of total downloads, but also have the feature of keeping sustained and steady downloads for a long time. For article downloads, non-OA papers only have a short period of attention, when the advantage of OA papers exists for a much longer time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Akre, O., Barone-Adesi, F., Pettersson, A., Pearce, N., Merletti, F., & Richiardi, L. (2009). Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: Do they reflect inequalities in access to publication? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(2), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., Connolly, M. J., & Godlee (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337(7665), 343–345.

  • Davis, P. M., & Solla, L. R. (2003). An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1062–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), 512–517. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2004). What is the threshold for open access Nirvana? http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3427.html2.

  • Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greyson, D., Morgan, S., Hanley, G., & Wahyuni, D. (2009). Open access archiving and article citations within health services and policy research. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 30(2), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2015.

  • Joint, N. (2009). The Antaeus column: does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian’s perspective. Library Review, 58(7), 477–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M. J., & Bollen, J. (2010). Usage bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, R. (2013). Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark. Nature, 500(7463), 491–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible. Nature, 411(6837), 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mounce, R. (2013). Open access and altmetrics: Distinct but complementary. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 14–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963–1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piwowar, H. (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745.

  • Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed August 4, 2014.

  • Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Mao, W. L., Xu, S. M., & Zhang, C. B. (2014a). Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1923–1933. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1167-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Peng, L., Zhang, C. B., Xu, S. M., Wang, Z., Wang, C. L., et al. (2013a). Exploring scientists’ working timetable: A global survey. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 665–675. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Wang, Z., Mao, W. L., & Liu, C. (2014b). How far does scientific community look back? Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 562–568. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Wang, Z., & Xu, S. M. (2013b). Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely. Scientometrics, 95(2), 717–729. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0884-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., Peng, L., Wang, Z., Wang, C. L., Zhang, C. B., et al. (2012). Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime? Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 655–660. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project of "National Natural Science Foundation of China" (61301227), and the project of “Growth Plan of Distinguished Young Scholar in Liaoning Province” (WJQ2014009). We really appreciate the suggestions from the anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianwen Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W. et al. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics 103, 555–564 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0

Keywords

  • Article-level metrics
  • Usage metrics
  • Altmetrics
  • Open access
  • Social media attention
  • Open access advantage