Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 103, Issue 2, pp 555–564 | Cite as

The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention

  • Xianwen Wang
  • Chen Liu
  • Wenli Mao
  • Zhichao Fang
Article
First Online:
Received:

Abstract

In this study, we compare the difference in the impact between open access (OA) and non-open access (non-OA) articles. 1761 Nature Communications articles published from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2013 are selected as our research objects, including 587 OA articles and 1174 non-OA articles. Citation data and daily updated article-level metrics data are harvested directly from the platform of nature.com. Data is analyzed from the static versus temporal-dynamic perspectives. The OA citation advantage is confirmed, and the OA advantage is also applicable when extending the comparing from citation to article views and social media attention. More important, we find that OA papers not only have the great advantage of total downloads, but also have the feature of keeping sustained and steady downloads for a long time. For article downloads, non-OA papers only have a short period of attention, when the advantage of OA papers exists for a much longer time.

Keywords

Article-level metrics Usage metrics Altmetrics Open access Social media attention Open access advantage 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project of "National Natural Science Foundation of China" (61301227), and the project of “Growth Plan of Distinguished Young Scholar in Liaoning Province” (WJQ2014009). We really appreciate the suggestions from the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Akre, O., Barone-Adesi, F., Pettersson, A., Pearce, N., Merletti, F., & Richiardi, L. (2009). Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: Do they reflect inequalities in access to publication? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(2), 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., Connolly, M. J., & Godlee (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337(7665), 343–345.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, P. M., & Solla, L. R. (2003). An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1062–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), 512–517. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2006.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garfield, E. (2004). What is the threshold for open access Nirvana? http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3427.html2.
  7. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greyson, D., Morgan, S., Hanley, G., & Wahyuni, D. (2009). Open access archiving and article citations within health services and policy research. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 30(2), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2015.
  10. Joint, N. (2009). The Antaeus column: does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian’s perspective. Library Review, 58(7), 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurtz, M. J., & Bollen, J. (2010). Usage bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwok, R. (2013). Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark. Nature, 500(7463), 491–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible. Nature, 411(6837), 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mounce, R. (2013). Open access and altmetrics: Distinct but complementary. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piwowar, H. (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159.Google Scholar
  18. Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745.
  19. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed August 4, 2014.
  20. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, X. W., Mao, W. L., Xu, S. M., & Zhang, C. B. (2014a). Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1923–1933. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1167-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, X. W., Peng, L., Zhang, C. B., Xu, S. M., Wang, Z., Wang, C. L., et al. (2013a). Exploring scientists’ working timetable: A global survey. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 665–675. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang, X. W., Wang, Z., Mao, W. L., & Liu, C. (2014b). How far does scientific community look back? Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 562–568. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang, X. W., Wang, Z., & Xu, S. M. (2013b). Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely. Scientometrics, 95(2), 717–729. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0884-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., Peng, L., Wang, Z., Wang, C. L., Zhang, C. B., et al. (2012). Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime? Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 655–660. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.003.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xianwen Wang
    • 1
  • Chen Liu
    • 1
  • Wenli Mao
    • 1
  • Zhichao Fang
    • 1
  1. 1.WISE Lab, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options