Scientometrics

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 333–336 | Cite as

Academia’s never-ending selection for productivity

Article

References

  1. Aitkenhead, D. (2013). Peter Higgs: I wouldn’t be productive enough for today’s academic system. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-boson-academic-system.
  2. Brischoux, F., & Cook, T. R. (2009). Juniors seek an end to the impact factor race. BioScience, 59, 638–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter, C. R., Cone, D. C., & Sarli, C. C. (2014). Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Academic Emergency Medicine, 21, 1160–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherubini, P. (2008). Impact factor fever. Science, 322, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, J., Ritchie, E. G., & Hanspach, J. (2012a). Academia’s obsession with quantity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 473–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, J., Ritchie, E. G., Hanspach, J., et al. (2012b). An academia beyond quantity: A reply to Loyola et al. and Halme et al. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 587–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson, D., Walter, G., Daly, J., & Cleary, M. (2013). Multiple outputs from single studies: Acceptable division of findings vs. ‘salami’ slicing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs, H. (2013). Dear DORA. EMBO Reports, 14, 947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs, H. (2014). Something rotten. EMBO Reports, 15, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaushal, S. S., & Jeschke, J. M. (2014). Collegiality versus competition: How metrics shape scientific communities. BioScience, 63, 155–156.Google Scholar
  11. Lawrence, P. A. (2007). The mismeasurment of science. Current Biology, 17, R583–R585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loyola, R. D., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., & Bini, L. M. (2012). Obsession with quantity: A view from the south. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McDade, L. A., Maddison, D. R., Guralnick, R., Piwowar, H. A., Jameson, M. L., Helgen, K. M., et al. (2011). Biology needs a modern assessment system for professional productivity. BioScience, 61, 619–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nabout, J. C., Parreira, M. R., Teresa, F. B., Carneiro, F. M., da Cunha, H. F., de Souza Ondei, L., et al. (2015). Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): The trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers. Scientometrics, 102, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanchis-Gomar, F. (2014). How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students? EMBO Reports, 15, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UMR 7372 CNRS-ULRCentre d’Etudes Biologiques de ChizéVilliers en BoisFrance

Personalised recommendations