Skip to main content

Topics in the literature of transition economies and emerging markets

Abstract

The research streams of transition economies and emerging markets have some common ground, but yet differ. The goal of this study is to provide a better understanding of the commonalities and differences regarding trends and topics of this cross-disciplinary research area. We employ the novel method of topic models on a corpus of nearly 6,000 articles in more than 600 journals from 1995 to 2012 to identify 25 topics and analyze their trends and use across scope (transition or emerging), disciplines (business or economics) and geography (countries or regions).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    More precisely, the latter term dates back to the early 1980s. We discuss this in detail later.

  2. 2.

    For the rest of this paper we will use the combined term transition markets to refer to this joint research area.

  3. 3.

    See, for example, Popov (2007).

  4. 4.

    The potential fourth issue of sensitivity of results on various similarity measures is not critical (An and Wu 2011).

  5. 5.

    The placement on the map is quite similar with the choice of the other scope or discipline as well as the difference of scores for scope and discipline.

  6. 6.

    With a cutoff point further up in the hierarchical tree Colombia can be also included in the emerging countries cluster.

References

  1. An, X., & Wu, Q. (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88(1), 133–144.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Azerbaijani Presidential Administration. (2012). Azerbaijan 2020: Look into the future. http://www.presidentaz/files/future-enpdf.

  3. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 7784.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006). Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning.

  5. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007a). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35.

  6. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007b). Topic Models. In A. Srivastava and M. Sahami (Ed.), Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications . Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., & Lafferty, J. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4/5), 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckley, P. J. (2002). Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 365–373.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Callon, M., Courtial, J., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campos, N., & Coricelli, F. (2002). Growth in transition: What we know, what we don’t know, and what we should. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), 793–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra, R., & Newburry, W. (1997). A cognitive map of the international business field. International Business Review, 6(4), 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, J., Boyd-Graber, J., Wang, C., Gerrish, S., & Blei, D. M. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Neural Information Processing Systems.

  13. Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, S., Sahay, R., & Vegh, C. (1996). Economies in transition: The beginnings of growth. American Economic Review, 86(2), 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Godoy, S., & Stiglitz, J. (2006). Growth, initial conditions, law and speed of privatization in transition countries: 11 years later. NBER Working Paper No 11992.

  16. Griffith, D. A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Xu, S. (2008). Emerging themes in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7), 1220–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grün, B., & Hornik, K. (2011). topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Havrylyshyn, O. (2001). Recovery and growth in transition: A decade of evidence. IMF Staff Papers, 48, 53–87.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hofer, K., Smejkal, A., Bilgin, F., & Wuehrer, G. (2010). Conference proceedings as a matter of bibliometric studies: The academy of international business 2006–2008. Scientometrics, 84(3), 845–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kearney, C. (2012). Emerging markets research: Trends, issues and future directions. Emerging Markets Review, 13(2), 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamirel, J. C. (2012). A new approach for automatizing the analysis of research topics dynamics: Application to optoelectronics research. Scientometrics, 93(1), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. I. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Liesch, P., Hkanson, L., McGaughey, S., Middleton, S., & Cretchley, J. (2011). The evolution of the international business field: a scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics, 88(1), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, G. Y., Hu, J. M., & Wang, H. L. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Melo, M., Denizer, C., & Gelb, A. (1996). Patterns of transition from plan to market. The World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Natale, F., Fiore, G., & Hofherr, J. (2012). Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature. Scientometrics, 90(3), 983–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nazarbayev, N. (2012) Strategy Kazakhstan 2050. http://www.akorda.kz/en/page/page_poslanie-prezidenta-respubliki-kazakhstanlidera-natsii-nursultana-nazarbaeva-narodu-kazakhstana.

  29. Ponweiser, M. (2012). Latent Dirichlet allocation in R. Master’s thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Institute for Statistics and Mathematics.

  30. Popov, V. (2007). Shock therapy versus gradualism reconsidered: Lessons from transition economies after 15 years of reforms. Comparative Economic Studies, 49(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R CoreTeam. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.

  32. Scimago. (2013). http://www.scimagojrcom/journalrankphp.

  33. Seitenova, A. G., & Becker, C. (2004). Kazakhstan’s pension system: Pressures for change and dramatic reforms. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 45(2), 151–187.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Song, M., & Kim, S. (2012). Detecting the knowledge structure of bioinformatics by mining full-text collections. Scientometrics, 96(1), 183–201.

  35. Su, H. N., & Lee, P. C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in technology foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wallach, H. M., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mimno, D. (2009). Evaluation methods for topic models. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on machine learning.

  37. Wuehrer, G., & Smejkal, A. (2013). The knowledge domain of the academy of international business studies (aib) conferences: A longitudinal scientometric perspective for the years 2006–2011. Scientometrics, 95(2),541–561.

  38. Yi, S., & Choi, J. (2012). The organization of scientific knowledge: The structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics, 90(3), 1015–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anke Piepenbrink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piepenbrink, A., Nurmammadov, E. Topics in the literature of transition economies and emerging markets. Scientometrics 102, 2107–2130 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1513-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Topic models
  • Emerging markets
  • Transition economies
  • International business
  • Economics