Skip to main content

Discussion about the new Nature Index


Very recently, the Nature Index has been proposed and published. It offers the possibility to rank institutions and countries according to the absolute numbers of papers published in a selection of 68 journals. We discuss the main elements of the Nature Index, and we wish to start a discussion about the Nature Index by stating four main points of criticism. The main problem of this Index seems to be the use of absolute numbers without normalization. Furthermore, measures of quality are reintroduced on the basis of reputation of journals rather than quality (impact) of single publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Bornmann, L., et al. (2012). Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatology International (Clinical and Experimental Investigations), 32(7), 1861–1867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N., & Grayson, M. (2014a). Index 2014 Global. Nature, 515(7526), S49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N., & Grayson, M. (2014b). Introducing the index. Nature, 515(7526), S52–S53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Haunschild.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. Discussion about the new Nature Index. Scientometrics 102, 1829–1830 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Absolute Number
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • Publication Output
  • Large Poll
  • Global Factor