, Volume 102, Issue 2, pp 1241–1268 | Cite as

The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis

  • Hugo Confraria
  • Manuel Mira GodinhoEmail author


The number of scientific papers published by researchers in Africa has been rising faster than the total world scientific output in recent years. This trend is relevant, as for a long period up until 1996, Africa’s share of the world scientific output remained below 1.5 %. The propensity to publish in the continent has risen particularly fast since 2004, suggesting that a possible take-off of African science is taking place. This paper highlights that, in parallel with this most recent growth in output, the apparent productivity of African science, as measured by publications to gross domestic product, has risen in recent years to a level above the world average, although, when one looks at the equivalent ratio after it has been normalized by population, there is still a huge gap to overcome. Further it is shown that publications from those few African countries whose scientific communities demonstrate higher levels of specialization and integration in international networks, have a higher impact than the world average. Additionally, the paper discusses the potential applications of the new knowledge that has been produced by African researchers, highlighting that so far, South Africa seems to be the only African country where a reasonable part of that new knowledge seems to be connecting with innovation.


Africa Science Research policy Bibliometrics Research assessment Scientific impact 

Mathematics Subject Classification


JEL Classification

O38 O39 


  1. Adams, J. (2013). Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature, 497, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J., Gurney, K. C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics, 98, 547–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, J., King, C., & Hook, D. (2010). Africa, pp. 1–9. Global research report: Africa, Thomson Reuters. ISBN 1-904431-25-9.Google Scholar
  4. African Progress Report. (2013). Equity in extractives: Stewarding Africa’s natural resources for all. Geneva: Africa Progress Panel.Google Scholar
  5. Albuquerque, E. M. (2004). Science and technology systems in less developed countries. In H. F. Moed, W. Glanzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 759–778). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ANSTI. (2005). State of science and technology training institutions in Africa. Report by the African network of scientific and technological institutions. Nairobi: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  7. Arunachalam, S. (2004). Science on the periphery: Bridging the information divide. In H. F. Moed, W. Glanzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “Revealed” comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornmann, L., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The new excellence indicator in the World report of the SCImago institutions rankings. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites™ data and the statistical significance of trends. PLoS One, 8(2), e56768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bujoreanu, L. (2013). The power of mobile: Saving Uganda’s banana crop. World Bank Blogs. Accessed May 07, 2014.
  12. Docquier, F., Lohest, O., & Marfouk, A. (2007). Brain drain in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review, 21, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fournie, J. J., Gaits, F., & Bonneville, M. (2005). Science and society—Promoting the learning of immunology in developing countries. Nature Reviews Immunology, 5, 893–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garfield, E. (1983). Mapping science in the third World. Science and Public Policy, June, 112–127.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbons, M., & Johnston, R. (1974). The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy, 3(3), 220–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassan, M. H. (2002). Science and Africa’s salvation. Project syndicate. Accessed December 18, 2013.
  17. InCites™ Thomson Reuters. (2013). Data processed 20 March, 2013. Data source: Web of science. This data is reproduced under a license from Thomson Reuters to the University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
  18. UN News Centre (2009). Nigeria surpasses hollywood as world’s second largest film producer. UN News Centre. Accessed May 07, 2014.
  19. Irikefe, V., Vaidyanathan, G., Nordling, L., Twahrirwa, A., Nakkazi, E., & Monastersky, R. (2011). The view from the frontline. Nature, 474, 556–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juma, C. (2008). Agricultural innovation and economic growth in Africa: renewing international cooperation. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 4, 256–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahn M. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of South Africa’s scientific outputs—some trends and implications. South African Journal of Science, 107 (1–2), 1–6.  10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.406.
  22. Laursen, K. (2000). Do export and technological specialization patterns co-evolve in terms of convergence or divergence? Evidence from 19 OECD countries, 1971–1991. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C., Park, H. W., & Adams, J. (2013). International collaboration in science: The global map and the network. El Profesional de la Información, 22(1), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lundvall, B.-A. (2009). Innovation in Africa—towards a realistic vision. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 1, 212–219.Google Scholar
  25. Megnibeto, E. (2013). International collaboration in scientific publishing: the case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96, 761–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muchie, M. (Ed.). (2003). The making of African-Nation: Pan-Africanism and the African renaissance. London: Adonis & Abbey.Google Scholar
  27. Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Russell, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2002). Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics, 54(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nchinda, T. C. (2002). Research capacity strengthening in the South. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1699–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency. (2003). Declaration of the first NEPAD ministerial conference on science and technology. Johannesburg: NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency.Google Scholar
  30. NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency. (2010). African innovation outlook 2010. Pretoria: NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency.Google Scholar
  31. Omamo, S. W., & Lynam, J. K. (2003). Agricultural science and technology policy in Africa. Research Policy, 32, 1681–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pouris, A. (2010). A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community: Science in the tip of Africa. Scientometrics, 85, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pouris, A., & Ho, Y. (2014). Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics, 98, 2169–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. The Economist (2013a). Africa rising: A hopeful continent. The economist. Accessed December 18, 2013.
  36. The Economist (2013b). Guinea-Bissau, Guinea and Sierra Leone: Tired of war. Why fighting across much of the continent has died down in recent years. The economist. Accessed December 18, 2013.
  37. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: new analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovations systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88(2), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2013). Human development report. The rise of the south: Human progress in a diverse world. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  40. UNESCO (2014). UNESCO institute for statistics database. Retrieved from: Accessed May 07, 2014.
  41. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2010). Sub-Saharan Africa. In UNESCO science report 2010: The current status of science around the World (pp. 279–319). UNESCO publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Uthman, O. A., & Uthman, M. B. (2007). Geography of Africa biomedical publications: An analysis of 1996–2005 pubmed papers. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6, 46–56. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waast, R., & Rossi, P.-L. (2010). Scientific production in Arab countries: A bibliometric perspective. Science Technology and Society, 15(2), 339–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Web of Science™ Thomson Reuters (2013). Data processed December 18, 2013.Google Scholar
  46. World Bank (2013). World development indicators database. Retrieved from: Accessed March 20, 2013.
  47. Zegeye, A., & Vambe, M. (2006). Knowledge production and publishing in Africa. Development Southern Africa, 23(3), 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISEG (School of Economics and Management)Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.UECE (Research Unit on Complexity and Economics)LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations