Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of the scientific output of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article discusses the scientific output of the three South Caucasus republics: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are widely referred to as Transcaucasia Republics or South Caucasus Republics). It focuses on the scientific publications of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia indexed in the Web of Science international database. The article first examines the role of the three republics in Soviet science and the scientific papers they produced during the last decade of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The article then studies the scientific situation in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia after the restoration of their independence in 1991, reviewing the three republics’ scientific publications, their citations and their scientific cooperation, as well as other scientific indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first draft of an R&D law was presented to the Parliament in 1998 but has not yet been approved.

  2.  Foreign publications are counted when applying for a grant. In Armenia, e.g., concerned bodies are discussing the requirement for PhD candidates to have at least one publication in the journal indexed by an international database.

  3. Some abstracting and indexing services cover only a limited number of Soviet scientific journals. For example, in 1974 there were only 83 Soviet journals and over 900 American journals in SCI. So, domestically produced works were and are overlooked in bibliometric analyses.

  4. The USSR officially ceased to exist in 1991.

  5. This may be due to late publication of articles written in 1991 and affiliation problems.

  6. Currently there are 66 Turkish journals, the number of which is constantly rising.

References

  • Ayvazyan, N., & Gzoyan, E. (2012). Mapping the intellectual capital of post-soviet states. Open Innovation, European Union, 123–130.

  • Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National Research Profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003). An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Sceintometrics, 70(2), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2009) Science in a changing Europe: East vs. West. National Scientific Profiles by Subject Fields. ISSI Newsletter, 5(3), 52–58.

  • Higher Education Governance Report (2005) N 1538520 of the World Bank 2005. http://www-wds.worldbank.org).

  • Information Exchange in Science and Technology between the European Research Area and Eastern European/Central Asian Countries, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Country Report (2012).

  • Karamourzov, R. (2012). The development trends of science in the CIS countries on the basis of some scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 91(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakévich, V. D. (1944). Recent social trends in the Soviet Union: Social sciences in the Soviet Union. American Sociological Review, 9(3):312–318.

  • Narin, F., Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1983). Highly cited soviet papers: An exploratory investigation. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 307–319.

  • National Economy of USSR. Statistical Yearbook. Moscow 1982, 1990.

  • Sendov, B. (1993). Central and Eastern Europe. World Science Report.

  • World Science Report, UNESCO 1993.

  • World Science Report, UNESCO 1996.

  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kirvaitis, R., & Dagienė, E. (2011). Scientific publications released in the Baltic States. Scientometrics, 88(1), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20 years of CIS (2009) Statistical Bulletin: N18, 2004; N18, 2006; N18, 2007; N18, 2008; N19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shushanik A. Sargsyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gzoyan, E.G., Hovhannisyan, L.A., Aleksanyan, S.A. et al. Comparative analysis of the scientific output of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Scientometrics 102, 195–212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1452-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1452-y

Keywords

Navigation