Scientometrics

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 307–327

Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science

Article

Abstract

The role of conference proceedings for scientific communication varies among the different research fields. It is thus difficult to determine how to use them in bibliometric studies that cover all or at least a variety of the research fields without favouring or penalizing observation subjects that are specialized in fields that rely heavily on conference proceedings. Also, the coverage of conference proceedings in bibliometric databases is often unclear. Not only have there been reports of misclassification but also of insufficient coverage. In this study, the Web of Science is used to give an overview of coverage of conference proceedings as well as advantages and pitfalls of their usage in bibliometric analyses. In particular, the focus lies on different citation behaviour of and for conference proceedings and the implications for bibliometric indicators. This is complemented by an investigation of the development of coverage and publication behaviour in conference proceedings which is compared to those of journal publications. Finally, the importance but also drawbacks and opportunities of acknowledging conference proceedings publications for bibliometric studies are summarized.

Keywords

Web of science Conference proceedings Publication analysis Citation analysis Fields of science 

References

  1. Abraham, P. (2000). Duplicate and salami publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 46(2), 67–69.Google Scholar
  2. Aleixandre-Benavent, R., González-Alcaide, G., Miguel-Dasit, A., Navarro-Molina, C., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2009). Full-text publications in peer-reviewed journals derived from presentations at three ISSI conferences. Scientometrics, 80(2), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Web of science with the conference proceedings citation indexes: The case of computer science. Scientometrics, 83(3), 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cocosila, M., Serenko, A., & Turel, O. (2011). Exploring the management information systems discipline: A scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC. Scientometrics, 87(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 46(4), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckmann, M., Rocha, A., & Wainer, J. (2012). Relationship between high-quality journals and conferences in computer vision. Scientometrics, 90(2), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franceschet, M. (2010). The skewness of computer science. Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harzing, A.-W. (2013). Document categories in the ISI web of knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences? Scientometrics, 94(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofer, K. M., Smejkal, A. E., Bilgin, F. Z., & Wuehrer, G. A. (2010). Conference proceedings as a matter of bibliometric studies: The Academy of International Business 2006–2008. Scientometrics, 84(3), 845–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Íñiguez-Rueda, L., Martínez-Martínez, L. M., Muñoz-Justicia, J., Peñaranda-Cólera, M. C., Sahagún-Padilla, M. Á., & Alvarado, J. G. (2008). The mapping of Spanish social psychology through its conferences: A bibliometric perspective. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kademani, B. S., Sagar, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Conference papers of BARC scientists and engineers: A citation based study, Proceedings of the National Conference on “Putting Knowledge to work: Best Practices in Librarianship”. Mumbai: Scientific Information Resource Division, Knowledge Management Group, Bhabha Atomic Research.Google Scholar
  13. Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, É. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lv, P. H., Wang, G. F., Wan, Y., Liu, J., Liu, Q., & Ma, F. C. (2011). Bibliometric trend analysis on global graphene research. Scientometrics, 88(2), 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison between scopus and web of science. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 59(11), 1711–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus Scopus and Google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moed, H. F., & Visser, M. S. (2007). Developing Bibliometric Indicators of Research Performance in Computer Science: An Exploratory Study. Research Report to the Council for Physical Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. The Hague: Council for Physical Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.Google Scholar
  18. Montesi, M., & Owen, J. M. (2008). From conference to journal publication: How conference papers in software engineering are extended for publication in journals. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 59(5), 816–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sigogneau, A. (2000). An analysis of document types published in journals related to physics: Proceeding papers recorded in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics, 47(3), 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation ResearchKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China (ISTIC)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations