Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation
- 464 Downloads
The concept of citer analysis investigated earlier by Ajiferuke and Wolfram (In: B. Larsen, J. Leta (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI) pp. 798–808, 2009, Scientometrics 83:623–638, 2010) is extended to journals where different citing units (citers, citing articles, citing journals) are compared with the journal impact factor and each other to determine if differences in ranking arise from different measures. The citer measures for the 31 high impact journals studied from information science and library science are significantly correlated, even more so than the earlier citer analysis findings, indicating that there is a close relationship among the different units of measure. Still, notable differences in rankings for the journals examined were evident for the different measures used, especially from either 5-year impact factor or number of citing articles per publication to the number of citing journals per publication. The journals that are adversely affected seem to be those whose citations are concentrated in a few journals. This informed the need to develop a journal citation concentration index, which can serve as a complementary measure to the existing journal impact indices.
KeywordsJournal citer analysis Citation analysis Journal impact factor Journal citation concentration index
JEL ClassificationC4 Econometric and statistical methods and methodology Special topics
This study represents an expanded version of a paper presented at the 14th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference held in Vienna in July 2013.
- Ajiferuke, I., & Wolfram, D. (2009). Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: Library and information science as a case study. In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI) (pp. 798–808). Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
- Egghe, L. (2012). A rationale for the relation between the citer h-index and the classical h-index of a researcher. Scientometrics, 1-4.Google Scholar
- Ioannidis, J.P. (2006). Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: Analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS One, 1(1), e5. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000005.
- Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50(3), 418–439.Google Scholar
- Strotmann, A., Zhao, D., & Bubela, T. (2009). Author name disambiguation for collaboration network analysis and visualization. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–20.Google Scholar