Skip to main content
Log in

A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations and the decomposition of the redundancy

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Triple Helix (TH) network of bi- and trilateral relations among universities, industries, and governments can be considered as an ecosystem in which uncertainty can be reduced when functions become synergetic. The functions are based on correlations among distributions of relations, and therefore latent. The correlations span a vector space in which two vectors (P and Q) can be used to represent forward “sending” and reflexive “receiving,” respectively. These two vectors can also be understood in terms of the generation versus reduction of uncertainty in the communication field that results from interactions among the three bi-lateral channels of communication. We specify a system of Lotka–Volterra equations between the vectors that can be solved. Redundancy generation can then be simulated and the results can be decomposed in terms of the TH components. Furthermore, we show that the strength and frequency of the relations are independent parameters in the model. Redundancy generation in TH arrangements can be decomposed using Fourier analysis of the time-series of empirical studies. As an example, the case of co-authorship relations in Japan is re-analyzed. The model allows us to interpret the sinusoidal functions of the Fourier analysis as representing redundancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ulanowicz (2009a, p. 1888) provides the following illustration: . However, one can add minus signs to the tails of the arrows in this figure, and thus obtain the trade-off between evolutionary auto-catalysis (“self-organization”) versus historical organization as in Fig. 1a, b.

  2. In the case of weak coupling among the three dimensions, one can use perturbation theory for an approximate solution. By writing the solution in terms of a formal power or perturbation series, one can formulate for relatively small parameters \( W^{2} \) (≪1), as follows:

    $$ R =\, \propto_{0} + \propto_{1} W^{2} + \propto_{2} (W^{2} )^{2} + \cdots $$
    (4a)

    Since raising the power of W 2 further leads to increasingly smaller values, one can approximate the perturbation solution by using the first two terms:

    $$ R =\, \propto_{0} + \propto_{1} W^{2} $$

    or, disregarding the constant term, as:

    $$ R \sim W^{2} $$
    (4b)

    Q.e.d.

  3. In a next step, one would be able to differentiate among different coupling coefficients in the three (bilateral) communication channels.

  4. One can generate the network graph from the attribution matrix by multiplication of the latter with its transposed.

  5. The second law of thermodynamics holds equally for probabilistic (Shannon) entropy, since S = k B H and k B is a constant (the Boltzmann constant). Because of the constant, the development of S over time is a function of the development of H, and vice versa.

  6. “Frequently the messages have meaning; that is they refer to or are correlated according to some system with certain physical or conceptual entities. These semantic aspects of communication are irrelevant to the engineering problem.” (Shannon 1948, p. 379).

References

  • Abramson, N. (1963). Information Theory and Coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. (1998). Italian industrial districts: A Triple Helix pattern of problem solving. Industry and Higher Education, 12(4), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. (2001). Self-organizing processes in building entrepreneurial networks: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Human Systems Management, 20(3), 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. M. (1998). Computing anticipatory systems with incursion and hyperincursion. In D. M. Dubois (Ed.), Computing anticipatory systems, CASYS-first international conference (Vol. 437, pp. 3–29). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamke, E. (1971). Differentialgleichungen: Lösungsmethoden und Lösungen (Vol. 1, p. 1). New York: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation. The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Q: an interpretation of the information theoretical Q-measures. In R. Trappl, G. J. Klir, & F. Pichler (Eds.), Progress in cybernetics and systems research (Vol. VIII, pp. 63–67). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2009a). W. Ross Ashby’s information theory: A bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today. International Journal of General Systems, 38(2), 189–212.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2009b). Information of interactions in complex systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38(6), 669–680.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163–175. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1994). Epilogue. In L. Leydesdorff & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Evolutionary economics and chaos theory: New directions for technology studies (pp. 180–192). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens’ “structuration theory” and Luhmann’s “self-organization”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2138–2150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2011). “Meaning” as a sociological concept: a review of the modeling, mapping, and simulation of the communication of knowledge and meaning. Social Science Information, 50(3–4), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Radical constructivism and radical constructedness: Luhmann’s sociology of semantics, organizations, and self-organization. Constructivist Foundations, 8(1), 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Science visualization and discursive knowledge. In B. Cronin & C. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Franse, S. (2009). The communication of meaning in social systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. & Ivanova, I. A. (2014) Mutual redundancies in inter-human communication systems: Steps towards a calculus of processing meaning. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 386–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Strand, Ø. (2013). The Swedish system of innovation: Regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1890–1902. doi:10.1002/asi.22895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. V. D. Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes (pp. 172–192). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19(2), 97–116.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423; 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, Ø., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Where is synergy in the Norwegian innovation system indicated? Triple Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, P. (1999). Triple contingency: The theoretical problem of the public in communication societies. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 25(2), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E. (2008). Autocatalysis. In S. E. Joergensen & B. D. Fath (Eds.), Systems ecology. Volume 1 of encyclopedia of ecology (Vol. 1, pp. 288–290). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009a). The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 220(16), 1886–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009b). A third window: Natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, R. W. (2008). Information theory and network coding. New York, NY: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inga A. Ivanova.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Communication of information and meaning in a TH dynamic symmetry model

In a TH dynamic symmetry model, communication field W is described by the following equation:

$$ \partial^{j} W_{ij} = - gW^{j} \times W_{ij} $$
(A.1)

Here i, j = 0,1; \( \partial_{0} = \partial_{t} \); \( \partial_{1} = - \partial_{x} \); \( \partial^{0} = \partial_{t} \); \( \partial^{1} = \partial_{x} \); summing on repeating indexes j is implied. Eq. (A.1) can be rewritten in a more explicit form:

$$ \begin{aligned} \partial^{1} W_{01} & = - gW^{1} \times W_{01} \\ \partial^{0} W_{10} & = - gW^{0} \times W_{10} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(A.2)

W ij is defined by the formula:

$$ W_{ij} = \partial_{i} W_{j} - \partial_{j} W_{i} + gW_{i} \times W_{j} $$
(A.3)

W i , W j are three-component vectors in TH internal symmetry space, and two component vectors in (x, t) space. We can define these as: \( W_{i} = \left( {P,Q} \right) \); \( W^{i} = \left( { - P,Q} \right) \); P, Q are three-component vectors in the case of university–industry–government (TH) relations. Eq. (A.3) can be expressed in components:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{l} W_{01} = Q_{t} + P_{x} + g\left( {P \times Q} \right) \\ W_{10} = - Q_{t} - P_{x} - g\left( {P \times Q} \right) \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(A.4)

and substituting this into (A.2) produces:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {P_{xx} + Q_{tx} = - g\left( {P_{x} \times Q} \right) - g\left( {P \times Q_{x} } \right) - gQ \times \left[ {P_{x} + Q_{t} + g\left( {P \times Q} \right)} \right]} \\ { - P_{xt} - Q_{tt} = g\left( {P_{t} \times Q} \right) + g\left( {P \times Q_{t} } \right) - gP \times \left[ {P_{x} + Q_{t} + g\left( {P \times Q} \right)} \right]} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(A.5)

Setting: \( P = P\left( \xi \right) \); \( Q = Q\left( \xi \right) \); \( \xi = x - t \), so that \( P_{x} = - P_{t} = P_{\xi } \); \( Q_{x} = - Q_{t} = Q_{\xi } \), summing first and second equations in (A.5), and assuming that: \( Q \times Q_{t} = gQ \times \left( {P \times Q} \right) \); \( P \times P_{x} = gP \times \left( {P \times Q} \right) \), we can rewrite Eq. (A.5) in the form:

$$ 2P_{\xi \xi } - 2Q_{\xi \xi } = 2\left( {P \times Q} \right) \times \left( {g^{2} Q + g^{2} P} \right) - g\left( {P \times Q_{\xi } } \right) - g\left( {Q \times P_{\xi } } \right) $$
(A.6)

This can be interpreted as describing two fields: P, Q propagating in a positive direction of the x axes.

We can show that Eq. (A.6) can be coupled to the equation describing these two fields P, Q propagating in a negative direction of the x axes (or propagating in a positive direction but reversed in time). Setting:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {{P_{t}} = - 2\beta \left( {P \times Q} \right)} \\ {{Q_{t}} = + 2\delta \left( {Q \times P} \right)} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(A.7)

where P, Q are vectors: \( P = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {P_{1} } \\ {P_{2} } \\ {P_{3} } \\ \end{array} } \right) \); \( Q = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {Q_{1} } \\ {Q_{2} } \\ {Q_{3} } \\ \end{array} } \right) \), and the right sides of (A.7) are cross-products. Alongside the “time” version of Eq. (A.7) can be introduced the “space” version of this equation:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {2P_{x} = - \beta \left( {P \times Q} \right)} \\ {2Q_{x} = + \delta \left( {Q \times P} \right)} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(A.8)

Each pair of Eqs. (A.7) and (A.8) describes the evolution of functions P and Q in time and space. We can obtain a combined space–time equation. Differentiating the first and second equations of the system (A.8) by t and taking into consideration (A.7) produces:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {2P_{xt} = + 2\beta^{2} \left( {P \times Q} \right) \times Q - \beta \left( {P \times Q_{t} } \right)} \\ {2Q_{xt} = - 2\delta^{2} \left( {P \times Q} \right) \times P + \delta \left( {Q \times P_{t} } \right)} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(A.9)

Setting further: \( P = P\left( \xi \right) \); \( Q = Q\left( \xi \right) \); \( \xi = x + t \), so that \( P_{x} = P_{t} = P_{\xi } \); \( Q_{x} = Q_{t} = Q_{\xi } \), and subtracting in (A.9) the second equation from the first, we obtain:

$$ 2P_{\xi \xi } - 2Q_{\xi \xi } = 2\left( {P \times Q} \right) \times \left( {\beta^{2} Q + \delta^{2} P} \right) - \beta \left( {P \times Q_{\xi } } \right) - \delta \left( {Q \times P_{\xi } } \right) $$
(A.10)

Equation (A.10) coincides in full with Eq. (A.6) if we set \( \beta = \delta = g \), but refers to solutions which evolve reversed in time.

Appendix 2

Analytical solution for a TH communication field

Defining the functions

$$ \begin{aligned} f_{1} & = 2g\left( {P_{2} Q_{3} - P_{3} Q_{2} } \right) \\ f_{2} & = 2g\left( {P_{3} Q_{1} - P_{1} Q_{3} } \right) \\ f_{3} & = 2g\left( {P_{1} Q_{2} - P_{2} Q_{1} } \right) \\ \end{aligned} $$
(B.1)

We can write a system of equations for a TH communication field (coupling constant 2g in the right-hand side of systems (B.2), (B.3) are not mentioned)

$$ \begin{array}{*{20}c} {P_{1t} = - f_{1} } & {Q_{1t} = f_{1} } \\ {P_{2t} = - f_{2} } & {Q_{2t} = f_{2} } \\ {P_{3t} = - f_{3} } & {Q_{3t} = f_{3} } \\ \end{array} $$
(B.2)

from system (2) we obtain:

$$ \begin{array}{*{20}l} {P_{1t} + Q_{1t} = 0} \\ {P_{2t} + Q_{2t} = 0} \\ {P_{3t} + Q_{3t} = 0} \\ \end{array} \quad {\text{or}}\;{\text{otherwise}}:\quad \begin{array}{*{20}l} {P_{1} + Q_{1} = \alpha } \\ {P_{2} + Q_{2} = \beta } \\ {P_{3} + Q_{3} = \gamma } \\ \end{array} $$
(B.3)

Expressing Q in terms of P from system (B.3) and substituting the result into system (B.2), we get:

$$ \begin{aligned} P_{1t} & = cP_{2} - bP_{3} \\ P_{2t} & = aP_{3} - cP_{1} \\ P_{3t} & = bP_{1} - aP_{2} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(B.4)

Here: \( a = - 2g\alpha \); \( b = - 2g\beta \); \( c = - 2g\gamma \). System (B.4) can be solved analytically and has a well-known solution (Kamke 1971)

$$ \begin{aligned} P_{1} & = aC_{0} + rC_{1} \cos \left( {rt} \right) + \left( {cC_{2} - bC_{3} } \right)\sin \left( {rt} \right) \\ P_{2} & = bC_{0} + rC_{2} \cos \left( {rt} \right) + \left( {aC_{3} - cC_{1} } \right)\sin \left( {rt} \right) \\ P_{3} & = cC_{0} + rC_{3} \cos \left( {rt} \right) + \left( {bC_{1} - aC_{2} } \right)\sin \left( {rt} \right) \\ \end{aligned} $$
(B.5)

Here: \( r^{2} = a^{2} + b^{2} + c^{2} \); \( aC_{1} + bC_{2} + cC_{3} = 0. \) From the equation:

$$ aP_{1t} + bP_{2t} + cP_{3t} = 0 $$
(B.6)

we get after integration:

$$ aP_{1} + bP_{2} + cP_{3} = C_{4} $$
(B.7)

and from the equation:

$$ P_{1} P_{1t} + P_{2} P_{2t} + P_{3} P_{3t} = 0 $$
(B.8)

we also get:

$$ P_{1}^{2} + P_{1}^{2} + P_{1}^{2} = C_{5} $$
(B.9)

This means that integral curves are situated simultaneously on the sphere surface. The same equation holds for \( Q \):

$$ Q_{1}^{2} + Q_{1}^{2} + Q_{1}^{2} = C_{6} $$
(B.10)

From (B.5) we get:

$$ a^{2} C_{0} + b^{2} C_{0} + c^{2} C_{0} = aP_{1} \left( 0 \right) + bP_{2} \left( 0 \right) + cP_{3} \left( 0 \right) + r\left( {aC_{1} + bC_{2} + cC_{3} } \right) $$

So that:

$$ C_{0} = \left( {aP_{1} \left( 0 \right) + bP_{2} \left( 0 \right) + cP_{3} \left( 0 \right)} \right)/r^{2} $$
(B.11)

Constants C 1, C 2, C 3 can be calculated from system (B.5):

$$ \begin{aligned} C_{1} & = \left( {P_{1} \left( 0 \right) - aC_{0} } \right)/r \\ C_{2} & = \left( {P_{2} \left( 0 \right) - bC_{0} } \right)/r \\ C_{3} & = \left( {P_{3} \left( 0 \right) - cC_{0} } \right)/r. \\ \end{aligned} $$
(B.12)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanova, I.A., Leydesdorff, L. A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations and the decomposition of the redundancy. Scientometrics 99, 927–948 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1241-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1241-7

Keywords

Navigation