Adler, N., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. The Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Antonakis, J., & Lalive, R. (2008). Quantifying scholarly impact: IQp versus the Hirsch h. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., & Kinouchi, O. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics,
Börner, K., Dall’Asta, L., Ke, W., & Vespignani, A. (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity,
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. European Science Editing,
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h-index and 37 different h-index variants. Journal of Informetrics,
Bourke, P. (1997). Discipline boundaries in the social sciences. Occasional Paper Series 1. Canberra: Academy of the Social Sciences.
Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data. Scientometrics,
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics,
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics,
Hagen, N. T. (2009). Credit for coauthors. Science,
Hare, J. (2012, December 6). How universities performed in ERA 2012. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/how-universities-performed-in-era-2012/story-e6frgcjx-1226530828592.
Harzing, A. W. (2007) Publish or Perish. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm.
Harzing, A. W. (2010). The Publish or Perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research.
Hellqvist, B. (2010). Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics,
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy,
Kaur, J., Hoang, D. T., Sun, X., Possamai, L., JafariAsbagh, M., Patil, S., et al. (2012). Scholarometer: A social framework for analyzing impact across disciplines. PLoS One,
Kaur, J., Radicchi, F., & Menczer, F. (2013). Universality of scholarly impact metrics. Journal of Informetrics,
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics,
Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics,
Schreiber, M. (2008). A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics,
Tol, R. S. (2011). Credit where credit’s due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts. Scientometrics,
Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva,