Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed

Abstract

The degree to which scholarly journal articles published in subscription-based journals could be provided open access (OA) through publisher-permitted uploading to freely accessible web locations, so called green OA, is an underexplored area of research. This study combines article volume data originating from the Scopus bibliographic database with manually coded publisher policies of the 100 largest journal publishers measured by article output volume for the year 2010. Of the 1.1 million articles included in the analysis, 80.4 % could be uploaded either as an accepted manuscript or publisher version to an institutional or subject repository after one year of publication. Publishers were found to be substantially more permissive with allowing accepted manuscripts on personal webpages (78.1 % of articles) or in institutional repositories (79.9 %) compared to subject repositories (32.8 %). With previous studies suggesting realized green OA to be around 12 % of total annual articles the results highlight the substantial unused potential for green OA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, 19(2), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Björk, B. C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. In Press. doi: 10.1002/asi.22963.

  3. Covey, D. T. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles: A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., et al. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(Sup1), 145–161. doi:10.1080/13614533.2010.518851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DOAJ. (2013). Directory of open access journals. http://www.doaj.org.

  6. Elsevier. (2013a). What does it cover? Content coverage guide for SciVerse/Scopus. Retrieved from http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/scopus-in-detail/facts.

  7. Elsevier. (2013b). Article posting policy. http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy#accepted-author-manuscript.

  8. Finch, J. (2012). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications, p.140. http://www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/.

  9. Finch, J. (2013). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications—A review of progress in implementing the recommendations of the Finch report, p.74. http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Final-version.pdf.

  10. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003). RoMEO studies 4: An analysis of journal publishers’ copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16(4), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen, D. (2012). Understanding and making use of academic authors’ open access rights. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(2), eP1050. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 124. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 64(7), 1323–1329. doi:10.1002/asi.22856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen, P. O., & Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575–603. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145. doi:10.1002/asi.21532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morris, S. (2009). Journal authors’ rights: Perception and reality (PRC Summary Paper 5). http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/JournalAuthorsRights.pdf.

  18. Publishers.org. (2013). Understanding CHORUS. http://www.publishers.org/press/107/.

  19. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 481–497. doi:10.1108/00012530510634226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SCIMago. (2007). SJR–SCImago journal & country rank. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com.

  21. Scopus. (2013). The Scopus bibliographic database. http://www.scopus.com/.

  22. SHERPA/RoMEO. (2013). SHERPA/RoMEO: Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/.

  23. SHERPA/RoMEO Statistics. (2013). SHERPA/RoMEO statistics. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php?la=en&fIDnum=|&mode=simple.

  24. Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S., & White, S. (2013). Researchers’ green open access practice: A cross-disciplinary analysis. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 334–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Key Perspectives Report, p. 97. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Open%20Access%20Self%20Archiving-an%20author%20study.pdf.

  27. Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2013). Social media and scholarly reading. Online Information Review, 37(2), 193–216. doi:10.1108/OIR-04-2012-0062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. UlrichsWeb. (2013). UlrichsWeb serials solutions. http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com.

  29. Web of Knowledge. (2013). Thomson reuters web of knowledge. http://apps.webofknowledge.com.

  30. Whitehouse.gov. (2013). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Laakso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laakso, M. Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99, 475–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Open access
  • Self-archiving
  • Scientific publishing
  • Science policy