, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 1935–1954 | Cite as

Visualizing knowledge space: a case study of Chinese licensed technology, 2000–2012

  • Yuandi Wang
  • Xin Pan
  • Xinyu Wang
  • Jin Chen
  • Lutao Ning
  • Ying Qin


To explore the rules of knowledge transfer and application activities in knowledge space, defined at both temporal and spatial scales, the present study employs a unique dataset of Chinese patent licensing during the period of 2000–2012, with a total of 91,551 patents. Our results indicate that 70 % of patents were licensed out in the first 3 years. As time elapses, the annual average technology age decreases. There is a moderate difference among different types of licensors and patent types but not technology domains. With regards to the spatial dimension, 86 % of patents were licensed out within 1,000 km. The annual average geographical distance exhibits the same trend as technology age. Except for technology domains, a moderate difference among licensors and patent types is observed. Moreover, the interaction between geographical distance and technology age shows that as the technology age increases, this technology appears to be transferred and applied over greater distances.


Knowledge space Technology transfer Patent Technology age Geographical distance 



This research is funded by national Science Foundation of China (grant no.71302133, 71272171, 71172111), Youth Project of Ministry of education, Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Funding (grant no. 13YJC790154), and funding of Sichuan University (skyb201302).


  1. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bartl, E., & Belohlavek, R. (2011). Knowledge spaces with graded knowledge states. Information Sciences, 181(8), 1426–1439.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Biglu, M. H. (2008). The influence of references per paper in the SCI to impact factors and the Matthew effect. Scientometrics, 74(3), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookes, B. C. (1981). The foundations of information science Part IV. Information science: The changing paradigm. Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casas, R., de Gortari, R., & Santos, M. J. (2000). The building of knowledge spaces in Mexico: A regional approach to networking. Research Policy, 29(2), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chawla, H. (2007). Managing intellectual property rights for better transfer and commercialization of agricultural technologies. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12(5), 330–340.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cowan, R., & Zinovyeva, N. (2013). University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3), 788–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao, X., Guo, X., Sylvan, K. J., & Guan, J. (2010). The Chinese innovation system during economic transition: A scale-independent view. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 618–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hong, W. (2008). Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004. Research Policy, 37(4), 580–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong, W., & Su, Y.-S. (2013). The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data. Research Policy, 42(2), 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, K. (2010). China’s innovation landscape. Science, 329, 632–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kollmer, H., & Dowling, M. (2004). Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms. Research Policy, 33(8), 1141–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Schoenmakers, W. (2008). Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creativity and innovation management, 17(2), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, X., & Ma, F. (2013). Transfer and distribution of knowledge creation activities of bio-scientists in knowledge space. Scientometrics, 95(1), 1–12.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowe, J., & Taylor, P. (1998). R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: Complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Management, 28(4), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Motohashi, K., & Yun, X. (2007). China’s innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages. Research Policy, 36(8), 1251–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simonin, B. L. (2004). An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh, K. (1997). The impact of technological complexity and interfirm cooperation on business survival. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Wu, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-W. (2012). A patent quality analysis for innovative technology and product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, Y., Pan, X., Chen, Y., & Gu, X. (2013a). Do references in transferred patent documents signal learning opportunities for the receiving firms? Scientometrics, 95(2), 731–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2013b). How fast do Chinese firms learn and catch up? Evidence from patent citations. Scientometrics, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1016-6.
  28. Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2013c). Learning-by-licensing: How Chinese firms benefit from licensing-in technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2012). Can open innovation approach be applied by latecomer firms in emerging countries? Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 4(3), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuandi Wang
    • 1
  • Xin Pan
    • 2
  • Xinyu Wang
    • 3
  • Jin Chen
    • 4
  • Lutao Ning
    • 5
  • Ying Qin
    • 6
  1. 1.School of BusinessSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.School of Public AdministrationSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.School of ManagementChina University of Mining and TechnologyXuzhouChina
  4. 4.School of Economics and ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  5. 5.School of Business and ManagementQueen Mary, University of LondonLondonUK
  6. 6.Science and Technology Promotion and Development Research Center in Sichuan ProvinceChengduChina

Personalised recommendations