Scientometrics

, Volume 98, Issue 2, pp 1033–1045 | Cite as

Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering

Article

Abstract

The development of science is accompanied by growth of scholarly publications, primarily in the form of articles in peer-reviewed journals. Scientific work is often evaluated through the number of scientific publications in international journals and their citations. This article discusses the impact of open access (OA) on the number of citations for an institution from the field of civil engineering. We analyzed articles, published in 2007 in 14 international journals with impact factor, which are included in the Journal Citation Reports subject category “Civil Engineering”. The influence of open access on the number of citations was analyzed. The aim of our research was to determine if open access articles from the field of civil engineering receive more citations than non-open access articles. Based on the value of impact factor and ranking in quartiles, we also looked at the influence of the rank of journals on the number of citations, separately for OA and Non OA articles, in databases Web of Science (WOS), Scopus and Google Scholar. For 2,026 studied articles we found out that 22 % of them were published as OA articles. They received 29 % of all citations in the observed period. We can conclude by the significance level 5 % or less that in the databases WOS and Scopus the articles from top ranked journals (first quartile) achieved more citations than Non OA articles. This argument can be confirmed for some other journals from second quartile as well, while for the journals ranked into the third quartile it can’t be confirmed. This could be confirmed only partly for journals from the second quartile, and would not be confirmed for journals ranked into the third quartile. This shows that open access is not a sufficient condition for citation, but increases the number of citations for articles published in journals with high impact.

Keywords

Scholarly publications Civil engineering Open access Citation 

References

  1. Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85, 243–256. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0190-z. Accessed May 15, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries, 65, 372–382. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002309/
  3. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Citations to the Introduction to informetrics indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 82(3), 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?—a comparison of WoS Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, T., Hajjem, C. & Harnad, S. (2006). Facts about open access. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/daser-harnad.pdf
  6. Björk, B. C. & Turk, Z. (2000). How scientists retrieve publications: an empirical study of how the internet is overtaking paper media. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6(2). Retrieved January12, 2013, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/06-02/bjork.html
  7. Björk, B. C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guônason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6). Retrieved January18, 2013, from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890572.
  8. Björk, B. C. (2011). A study of innovative features in scholarly open access Journals. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4)e115. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e115/
  9. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? a critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248. Retrieved January 25, 2013 from, http://www.publishingresearch.net/Citations-SummaryPaper3_000.pdf Google Scholar
  10. Davis, P. M., & Fromerth, M. J. (2007). Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics, 71(2), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. P., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomized controlled trial. BMJ, 337, a568. doi:10.1136/bmj.a568. Retrieved January 15, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., et al. (2007). Coverage analysis of SCOPUS: a journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157. Retrieved January 19, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of science and scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8-21. doi:10.1108/14684520810865958.Google Scholar
  16. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6), 1–6. Retrieved January 17, 2013, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
  17. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, S., et al. (2004). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search—comparison of major features of web of science, Scopus and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537–1547.Google Scholar
  19. Jacso, P. (2006). Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review, 30(3), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Južnič, P., Pečlin, S., Žaucer, M., Mandelj, T., Pušnik, M., & Demšar, F. (2010). Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests. Scientometrics, 85(2), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koler-Povh, T., & Žumer, M. (2012). Research on the impact of open access on the citation of scientific publications. Geodetski vestnik 56(2), 325–342. Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.geodetski-vestnik.com/56/2/gv56-2_325-342.pdf.
  22. Koler-Povh, T., Južnič, P., Turk, Ž., & Turk, G. (2011). Analysis of scientific publications in civil and geodetic engineering in Slovenia, in the case of the Faculty of civil and geodetic engineering in University of Ljubljana. Geodetski vestnik, 53(4), 749–763. Retrieved January 15, 2013 from, http://www.geodetski-vestnik.com/55/4/gv55-4_764-780.pdf
  23. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: a multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 1055–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Demleitner, M., & Murray, S. S. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1395–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or Invisible? Nature (London), 411(6837), 521. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://tildalawrence/papers/online-nature01/_may,1,2006
  26. Lin, S. K. (2007). Non-open access and its adverse impact on molecules. Molecules, 12(7), 1436–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin, S. K. (2009). Full open access journals have increased impact factors. Molecules, 14(6), 2254–2255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: a citation study from Thomson Scientific. Retrieved January 27, 2013, from http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf
  29. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: web of science versus Scopus and Google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Metcalfe, T. S. (2006). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Physics, 239, 549–553. doi:10.1007/s11207-006-0262-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & De Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and Scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “Open Access” upon citation impact: an analysis of arxiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2047–2054. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/Citations-finalversion.pdf
  33. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SCOPUS. (2012). Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://www.info.sciverse.com/Scopus/Scopus-in-detail/facts
  35. Suber, P. (2007). Open access overview. focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. Last revised June 19, 2007. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
  36. Swan, A. & Hall, M. (2010). Why open access can change science in the developing world. Public Service Review: International Development Online. (In Press) Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/21550/
  37. Turk, Ž., & Björk, B. C. (2008). Effective web dissemination of construction IT research publications. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice., 134(2), 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2008). A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources. Scientometrics, 74(2), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and web of science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xia, J. F., Myers, R. L., & Wilhoite, S. K. (2011). Multiple open access availability and citation Impact. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 19–28. doi:10.1177/0165551510389358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Web of Science (WoS). IZUM. 2012. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from http://home.izum.si/izum/ft_baze/WoS.asp.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil and Geodetic EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of ArtsUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations