Scientometrics

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 347–368 | Cite as

Standardization problem of author affiliations in citation indexes

Article

Abstract

Academic effectiveness of universities is measured with the number of publications and citations. However, accessing all the publications of a university reveals a challenge related to the mistakes and standardization problems in citation indexes. The main aim of this study is to seek a solution for the unstandardized addresses and publication loss of universities with regard to this problem. To achieve this, all Turkey-addressed publications published between 1928 and 2009 were analyzed and evaluated deeply. The results show that the main mistakes are based on character or spelling, indexing and translation errors. Mentioned errors effect international visibility of universities negatively, make bibliometric studies based on affiliations unreliable and reveal incorrect university rankings. To inhibit these negative effects, an algorithm was created with finite state technique by using Nooj Transducer. Frequently used 47 different affiliation variations for Hacettepe University apart from “Hacettepe Univ” and “Univ Hacettepe” were determined by the help of finite state grammar graphs. In conclusion, this study presents some reasons of the inconsistencies for university rankings. It is suggested that, mistakes and standardization issues should be considered by librarians, authors, editors, policy makers and managers to be able to solve these problems.

Keywords

Standardization problem Finite state technique Data accuracy Data unification Address unification Research evaluation University rankings Citation indexes Nooj 

References

  1. Altıntaş, K. (2001). Turkish to Crimean Tatar machine translation system. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1964). Syntatic structures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, J. R. (2000). A short history of the use of citations as a measure of the impact of scientific and scholarly work. In The Web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 281–298). Medford, NJ: Information Today.Google Scholar
  4. Cornell, L. L. (1982). Duplication of Japanese names: A problem in citations and bibliographies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(2), 102–104.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Damerau, F. J. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM, 7(3), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Bruin, R. E., & Moed, H. F. (1990). The unification of addresses in scientific publications. In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics (Vol. 89–90, pp. 65–78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Falahati Qadimi Fumani, M. R., Goltaji, M., & Parto, P. (2012). Inconsistent transliteration of Iranian university names: a hazard to Iran’s ranking in ISI Web of Science. Scientometrics, doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0818-2.
  8. Galvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2006a). The unification of institutional addresses applying parametrized finite-state graphs (P-FSG). Scientometrics, 69(2), 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2006b). An evaluation of conflation accuracy using finite-state transducers. Journal of Documentation, 62(3), 328–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007a). Standardizing formats of corporate source data. Scientometrics, 70(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007b). Approximate personal name-matching through finite-state graphs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galvez, C., Moya-Anegón, F., & Solana, V. H. (2005). Term conflation methods in information retrieval: non-linguistic and linguistic approach. Journal of Documentation, 61(4), 520–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldsmith, J. A. (1993). The last phonological rule: reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hacettepe University Libraries. (2012). İndekslerde HÜ-TR: bilimsel yayınlarda adres bilgisi [HU-TR in citation indexes: address information for scientific publications]. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from http://library.hacettepe.edu.tr/index.php?kid=105&sid=111.
  15. Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2003). Informetric studies using databases: opportunities and challenges. Scientometrics, 58(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, C. D. (1972). Formal aspects of phonological description (monographs on linguistic analysis). The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, R. M., & Kay, M. (1994). Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguistics, 20, 301–378.Google Scholar
  18. Kettunen, K. (2008). Reductive and generative approaches to management of morphological variation of keywords in monolingual information retrieval: an overview. Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Mohri, M. (1997). Finite-state transducers in language and speech processing. Computational Linguistics, 23(2), 269–311.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Nooj. (2012). Nooj introduction. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://www.nooj4nlp.net/pages/introduction.html.
  22. Oflazer, K. (1996). Error-tolerant finite-state recognition with applications to morphological analysis and spelling correction. Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 73–89.Google Scholar
  23. Öğretim. (2007). Öğretim Üyeliğine Yükseltilme ve Atanma Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik [Regulation for changings on promotions and assignments for lecturers]. T.C. Resmi Gazete. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home=http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/05/20070526.htm&main=http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/05/20070526.htm.
  24. Piternick, A. B. (1982). Standardization of journal titles in databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(2), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roche, E., & Schabes, Y. (1995). Deterministic part-of-speech tagging with finite-state transducers. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 227–253.Google Scholar
  26. Roche, E., & Schabes, Y. (1996). Introduction to finite-state devices in natural language processing. Technical Report, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, TR96-13. Retrieved 27 February, 2012 from http://www.merl.com/papers/docs/TR96-13.pdf.
  27. Roche, E., & Schabes, Y. (1997). Finite-state language processing (language, speech and communication). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ruiz-Pérez, R., López-Cózar, E. D., & Jimėnez-Contreras, E. (2002). Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(4), 411–430.Google Scholar
  29. Scholl, M. H. (2008). (Some) Formal foundations of modelling dynamics. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://www.inf.uni-konstanz.de/fileadmin/dbis/im08/4-Dynamik-B.pdf.
  30. Taşkın, Z. (2012). Atıf dizinlerinde üniversite adreslerinin standardizasyon sorunu (Standardization problem of university addresses on citation indexes). Unpublished MA Thesis, Hacettepe University.Google Scholar
  31. The Council of Higher Education. (2010). 2010 yılı yayın istatistikleri [Publication statistics of 2010]. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://www.yok.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=728.
  32. Thomson Reuters. (2009). Web of Science 8.0. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/mgr/ws-wos-8-0-0807.pdf.
  33. Thomson Reuters. (2012). Searching the organizations—enhanced list. Retrieved 20 February, 2013 from http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS57B4/help/WOS/hp_organizations_enhanced_index.html.
  34. Toutkoushian, R. K., & Webber, K. (2011). Measuring the research performance of post-secondary institutions. In University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 123–144). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. ULAKBİM. (2007). Türkiye bilimsel yayın göstergeleri (1): 1981–2006 (National Scientific Indicators for Turkey (1): 1981–2006). In İ. H. Demirel, C. Saraç & E. A. Gürses (Eds.). Ankara: ULAKBİM.Google Scholar
  36. ULAKBİM. (2010). TÜBİTAK Uluslararası bilimsel yayınları teşvik programı uygulama esasları [Implementation fundamentals for TÜBİTAK Incentive Program for Scientific Publications]. ULAKBİM. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://www.ulakbim.gov.tr/cabim/ubyt/esaslar_v2.pdf.
  37. URAP (University Ranking by Academic Performance). (2011). Genel Bilgi [General information]. Retrieved 28 December, 2012 from http://tr.urapcenter.org/2011_2/2011_7.php.
  38. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, M. E., & Lannom, L. (1981). Lack of standardization of the journal title element in databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementHacettepe UniversityBeytepeTurkey

Personalised recommendations