Skip to main content

Resilience thinking: a bibliometric analysis of socio-ecological research

Abstract

Resilience thinking is a rising topic in environmental sciences and sustainability discourse. In this paper, a bibliometric method is used to analyse the trends in resilience research in the contexts of ecological, economic, social, and integrated socio-ecological systems. Based on 919 cited publications in English which appeared between 1973 and 2011, the analysis covers the following issues: general statistical description, influential journal outlets and top cited articles, geographic distribution of resilience publications and covered case studies, national importance of resilience researchers and leading research organisations by country. The findings show that resilience thinking continues to dominate environmental sciences and has experienced a dramatic increase since its introduction in 1973. More recently, new interest has emerged for broadening the scope and applying the concept to socio-economic systems and sustainability science. The paper also shows that resilience research overall is dominated by USA, Australia, UK and Sweden, and makes the case for the need to expand this work further in the urgent need for practically oriented solutions that would help arrest further ecological deterioration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adger, N. W., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309, 1036–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjurström, A., & Polk, M. (2011). Climate change and interdisciplinarity: A co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report. Scientometrics, 87, 525–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns, M., & Weaver, A. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring sustainability science: A Southern African perspective. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1972). The Ortega hypothesis. Science, 178, 368–375. Retrieved Dec 18 2012. Online access: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/178/4059/368.full.pdf.

  7. Elsevier (2012). SciVerse open to accelerate science: About Scopus. Retrieved Dec 17 2012. Online access: http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/about.

  8. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Folke, C. (2003). Freshwater for resilience: A shift in thinking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 2027–2036. Online access: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/.

  10. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5), 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B. H., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Google Scholar (n.d.). Stand on the shoulders of giants. Retrieved Dec 17 2012. Online access: http://scholar.google.com.au/intl/en/scholar/about.html.

  14. Harzing, A.-W. (2012). Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences?. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0738-1.

  15. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janssen, M. A., Schoon, M. L., Ke, W., & Börner, K. (2006). Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16, 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jappe, A. (2007). Explaining international collaboration in global environmental change research. Scientometrics, 71(3), 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ludwig, D., Mangel, M., & Haddad, B. (2001). Ecology, conservation and public policy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 481–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marinova, D., & McGrath, N. (2005). Transdisciplinarity in teaching and learning sustainability. In G. Banse, I. Hronszky, & G. Nelson (Eds.), Rationality in an uncertain world (pp. 275–285). Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McMichael, A. J., Butler, C. D., & Folke, C. (2003). New visions for addressing sustainability. Science, 302, 1919–1920.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perrings, C. (1998). Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems. Environmental & Resource Economics, 11(3), 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quental, N., & Lourenço, J. M. (2012). References, authors, journals and scientific disciplines underlying the sustainable development literature: A citation analysis. Scientometrics, 90, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Resilience Alliance (2002). Resilience. Retrieved Dec 17 2912. Online access: http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/resilience.

  25. Rose, A. (2007). Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environmental Hazards, 7(4), 383–398.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Small, H. (2004). Why authors think their papers are highly cited. Scientometrics, 60(3), 305–316.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson Reuters (2012) Web of knowledge. Retrieved Dec 17 2012. Online access: http://wokinfo.com/.

  28. Troell, M., Pihl, L., Rönnbäck, P., Wennhage, H., Söderqvist, T., & Kautsky, N. (2005). Regime shifts and ecosystem services in Swedish coastal soft bottom habitats: When resilience is undesirable. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 30. Online access: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art30/.

  29. Veugelers, R. (2010). Towards a multipolar science world: Trends and impact. Scientometrics, 82(2), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. Online access: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walker, B., Pearson, L., Harris, M., Maler, K., Li, C., Biggs, R., & Baynes, T. (2010). Incorporating resilience in the assessment of inclusive wealth: An example from South East Australia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang, K., & Meho, L. I. (2006). Citation analysis: A comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. In 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), Austin, USA. Retrieved Dec 18 2012. Online access: http://eprints.rclis.org/bitstream/10760/8605/1/Yang_citation.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Roman Trubka and Cole Hendrigan for their assistance with GIS mapping and helpful suggestions. The second author also acknowledges the financial assistance by the Australian Research Council. We are also thankful to the Journal’s Editor and referees for helpful and constructive comments which improved the quality of the paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dora Marinova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, L., Marinova, D. Resilience thinking: a bibliometric analysis of socio-ecological research. Scientometrics 96, 911–927 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0957-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Sustainability
  • Resilience
  • Socio-ecological systems